GODS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/28/gods-3/
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 01:54:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321268976853291008
GODS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/28/gods-3/
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 01:54:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321268976853291008
GODS
—“Earlier in the year, around Richmond event, you posted something to the effect that God had imbued us with special chosenness and with the divine mandate to lead the rest of the world kicking and screaming out of poverty, ignorance etc. And that parasitism, tolerance, and civ collapse is the price we pay to the universe for these gifts. Did I understand your thoughts clearly?”—
You understood correctly (or at least closely enough) because I was speaking in the language and grammar of inspirational theology: wisdom. In my work I am not working in the language and grammar of inspirational theology, but of juridical decidability: science.
It’s not that I”m incapable of inspirational prose. It’s that it’s not the problem that needs solving because every appeal to inspiration that affects any faction of the right will alienate the rest of the factions of the right. So, I just use truth and policy under the presumption that rational self-interest in self-preservation will eventually eclipse shallow demand for emotional inspiration.
That said, I absolutely positively agree with what I said to you. It’s just that my concept of God, which you take as anthropomorphic is considerably more complex and the difference between the Semitic god and my understanding is a bit like the difference between arithmetic and geometric transformations in n!-dimensional manifolds so to speak. So we can only, and therefore must, imagine ‘god’ as what we are capable of imagining and understanding. And we all must hold onto the presumption that there are those more capable of understanding than we, and that at some point others more capable than them.
If the universe can calculate something it will, and will do so when and where it must, and not where it can’t and mustn’t. The challenge for man is that god does not care for man, and the universe is not made for us, but we for it, and we are being constructed over eons to fulfill the universe’s purpose – as are others like and unlike us too – because most of us will fail. The stories of the gods are made by men to make our ‘utility’ bearable.
So my words are spoken in the context that in retrospect it is rather evident that we HAVE dragged mankind out of his condition as animal into at least some potential for godhood ourselves – to act as the hands of the gods on their behalf.
The truth is, that all evidence is that the universe and the gods care nothing for us, other than what they must in order to achieve their ends. This is why I prefer the pagan gods. They are equal fictions but at least they do not lie, and they were not invented by men to deceive men to profit or manipulate, control, or govern, or comfort men but to EDUCATE THEM.
We are, at least in potential, sort of like neo to the architect: the exception that proves the rule. The outliers.
GODS
—“Earlier in the year, around Richmond event, you posted something to the effect that God had imbued us with special chosenness and with the divine mandate to lead the rest of the world kicking and screaming out of poverty, ignorance etc. And that parasitism, tolerance, and civ collapse is the price we pay to the universe for these gifts. Did I understand your thoughts clearly?”—
You understood correctly (or at least closely enough) because I was speaking in the language and grammar of inspirational theology: wisdom. In my work I am not working in the language and grammar of inspirational theology, but of juridical decidability: science.
It’s not that I”m incapable of inspirational prose. It’s that it’s not the problem that needs solving because every appeal to inspiration that affects any faction of the right will alienate the rest of the factions of the right. So, I just use truth and policy under the presumption that rational self-interest in self-preservation will eventually eclipse shallow demand for emotional inspiration.
That said, I absolutely positively agree with what I said to you. It’s just that my concept of God, which you take as anthropomorphic is considerably more complex and the difference between the Semitic god and my understanding is a bit like the difference between arithmetic and geometric transformations in n!-dimensional manifolds so to speak. So we can only, and therefore must, imagine ‘god’ as what we are capable of imagining and understanding. And we all must hold onto the presumption that there are those more capable of understanding than we, and that at some point others more capable than them.
If the universe can calculate something it will, and will do so when and where it must, and not where it can’t and mustn’t. The challenge for man is that god does not care for man, and the universe is not made for us, but we for it, and we are being constructed over eons to fulfill the universe’s purpose – as are others like and unlike us too – because most of us will fail. The stories of the gods are made by men to make our ‘utility’ bearable.
So my words are spoken in the context that in retrospect it is rather evident that we HAVE dragged mankind out of his condition as animal into at least some potential for godhood ourselves – to act as the hands of the gods on their behalf.
The truth is, that all evidence is that the universe and the gods care nothing for us, other than what they must in order to achieve their ends. This is why I prefer the pagan gods. They are equal fictions but at least they do not lie, and they were not invented by men to deceive men to profit or manipulate, control, or govern, or comfort men but to EDUCATE THEM.
We are, at least in potential, sort of like neo to the architect: the exception that proves the rule. The outliers.
I mean, the dept of sentimental continental childish thinking is just amazing to me, and so obviously the result of xian indoctrination in magical thinking.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-26 21:13:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320835885110317056
Reply addressees: @CarsonMcCuller5 @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320833981030555649
An Example of Why It’s Time Consuming To Counter The System of Abrahamic Deceit https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/24/an-example-of-why-its-time-consuming-to-counter-the-system-of-abrahamic-deceit/
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 16:10:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320034853946068995
Don Gately —“I see you jumped straight to roundabout…”— I see you jumped straight to abrahamic lying. Answer the question: “define a god without reference to properties”?
ANALYSIS
DG: The Objection:
—“Properties are reserved for matter and not gods [properties are limited to matter.]”—
CD: The Falsification
“define a god without reference to properties”
Supported by: Language: Reference(name), Properties (necessary), Attributes(tangential), Where all properties and attributes must be conveyed by analogy to experience (measurement).
The Error:
References (Names), their Properties (measurements), and Attributes (measurements) are references to sets of human experiences (measurements) used to describe the reference. One cannot testify to (measure) the impossible to experience (measure with human sense, perception, auto-association, prediction-imagination, action ).
The Sophism (Deceit):
The attempt by DG to:
… (a) claim the un-referenceable can be referenced
… (b) claim properties are of references rather than human measurements of the perception of references.
… (c) claim that the reference to the operations (measurements) are somehow non-correspondent, inflationary, or conflationary.
The Origin of the Sophism (Deceit):
Training (indoctrination) in the Abrahamic method of deceit. A method developed for the social construction of false promise, baiting individuals and groups into hazard, just like drug dealers seek to make addicts to what they sell.
If you want to live your life according to the actions and ambitions of Jesus (and the four-or-five demands upon you that makes) that will generally work out well for you because it’s a hyper investment in cooperation especially as your competence moves left of the median of the distribution. But stop trying to justify it with supernatural lies. The reason you demand those lies is indoctrination and addiction into a set of paradigms that do not correspond to existential religion and the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe are so that you can addict others, as you are addicted, and limit the continuous falsification of your socially constructed illusion. There is no difference between Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and alcohol, drug, sex, risky behavior addiction. They are equal means of sedation. The difference is that while the forgiveness of Jesus and the exhaustion of trust will end familism, tribalism, and corruption, and prepare a people for a majority middle class economy under rule of law, that preparation comes at a cost of the Abrahamic method of deceit destroying the minds of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic addicts.
Jesus was a faith healer (scam artist) who was legitimately exasperated by the condition of the underclass given the predation of their own (jews), they’re being left behind by new roman rule, economy, and prosperity, the failure of their religion and myth to compete with the coming ‘modernity’, the failure of their leadership (once again) to modernize (give scamming), and their low status, and even lower status under that new, wealthier, more metropolitan, better-educated civilization (where you are a freeman, a citizen or slave (domesticated animal). Just like the bottom justifiably feels left behind today – both left and right. The people of Palestine were today’s favela-dwellers. And like today’s Islamists resist surrender of their addiction, those people resisted the surrender of their addictions. (Roman religion was nothing more than loyalty and duty attestation, and xians considered atheists).
Abrahamic religion is a threat to mankind. Xianity invented by Paul is not Jesus’ teachings – which can be written on three sheets of paper, and reduced to four sentences – but an attempt to replace the heroic narrative of the Epic Cycle with the anti-hero (victimhood) of Jesus.
So learn to testify, and learn how not to lie.
Truth built everything good in the west.
Truth is enough to restore it.
No More Lies.
Don Gately —“I see you jumped straight to roundabout…”— I see you jumped straight to abrahamic lying. Answer the question: “define a god without reference to properties”?
ANALYSIS
DG: The Objection:
—“Properties are reserved for matter and not gods [properties are limited to matter.]”—
CD: The Falsification
“define a god without reference to properties”
Supported by: Language: Reference(name), Properties (necessary), Attributes(tangential), Where all properties and attributes must be conveyed by analogy to experience (measurement).
The Error:
References (Names), their Properties (measurements), and Attributes (measurements) are references to sets of human experiences (measurements) used to describe the reference. One cannot testify to (measure) the impossible to experience (measure with human sense, perception, auto-association, prediction-imagination, action ).
The Sophism (Deceit):
The attempt by DG to:
… (a) claim the un-referenceable can be referenced
… (b) claim properties are of references rather than human measurements of the perception of references.
… (c) claim that the reference to the operations (measurements) are somehow non-correspondent, inflationary, or conflationary.
The Origin of the Sophism (Deceit):
Training (indoctrination) in the Abrahamic method of deceit. A method developed for the social construction of false promise, baiting individuals and groups into hazard, just like drug dealers seek to make addicts to what they sell.
If you want to live your life according to the actions and ambitions of Jesus (and the four-or-five demands upon you that makes) that will generally work out well for you because it’s a hyper investment in cooperation especially as your competence moves left of the median of the distribution. But stop trying to justify it with supernatural lies. The reason you demand those lies is indoctrination and addiction into a set of paradigms that do not correspond to existential religion and the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe are so that you can addict others, as you are addicted, and limit the continuous falsification of your socially constructed illusion. There is no difference between Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and alcohol, drug, sex, risky behavior addiction. They are equal means of sedation. The difference is that while the forgiveness of Jesus and the exhaustion of trust will end familism, tribalism, and corruption, and prepare a people for a majority middle class economy under rule of law, that preparation comes at a cost of the Abrahamic method of deceit destroying the minds of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic addicts.
Jesus was a faith healer (scam artist) who was legitimately exasperated by the condition of the underclass given the predation of their own (jews), they’re being left behind by new roman rule, economy, and prosperity, the failure of their religion and myth to compete with the coming ‘modernity’, the failure of their leadership (once again) to modernize (give scamming), and their low status, and even lower status under that new, wealthier, more metropolitan, better-educated civilization (where you are a freeman, a citizen or slave (domesticated animal). Just like the bottom justifiably feels left behind today – both left and right. The people of Palestine were today’s favela-dwellers. And like today’s Islamists resist surrender of their addiction, those people resisted the surrender of their addictions. (Roman religion was nothing more than loyalty and duty attestation, and xians considered atheists).
Abrahamic religion is a threat to mankind. Xianity invented by Paul is not Jesus’ teachings – which can be written on three sheets of paper, and reduced to four sentences – but an attempt to replace the heroic narrative of the Epic Cycle with the anti-hero (victimhood) of Jesus.
So learn to testify, and learn how not to lie.
Truth built everything good in the west.
Truth is enough to restore it.
No More Lies.
Not sure which question you’re asking. My interest is the investigation of european natural religion that’s consistent and coherent with european group evolutionary strategy: primacy of man, self-determination, rule of law, truth, reason, and science b4 the abrahamic deceits.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 14:31:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320009955148259328
Reply addressees: @Emelianenko1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319925692327366656
A god is an archetypal fictional character that serves as a highly intuitive system of measurment for a group’s evolutionary strategy. The presumption of mental transparency produces arms-length introspection which disentangles (depersonalizes) self-image from that reflection.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 00:21:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319796002413596672
Reply addressees: @CarsonMcCuller5
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319778545539887106
Stop lying. I don’t care about ethnicity. I care only about the ancient invention of the most advanced system of lying yet developed by man, the dark ages that resulted, the billion dead from Islam, the 100m from communism, and the present crisis by neomarxism/postmodernism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-22 00:43:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319076847762755585
Reply addressees: @EndofourTime @jewishBud @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319075367156649985