I don’t know why it’s odd but a lot of us in the P-Law movement have religious backgrounds. I think it’s indoctrination into ‘higher calling’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 21:41:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411439942035779588
15. Isn’t libertarianism just another iteration of the Abrahamic method of false promise: inserting another column into this table of the history of Abrahamic methods of false promise? https://t.co/0EMlVjBDhR
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414335256248323
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414329958752268
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
14. Isn’t the Abrahamic method of argument predicated on the female method of seduction (attached) by use of pilpul, critique, heaping of undue praise, unwarrantable (false) promise of freedom from the laws of nature? Yet lacking the reproductive value of women in trade? https://t.co/heB1Z8Ymcq
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414329958752268
14. Isn’t the Abrahamic method of argument predicated on the female method of seduction (attached) by use of pilpul, critique, heaping of undue praise, unwarrantable (false) promise of freedom from the laws of nature? Yet lacking the reproductive value of women in trade? https://t.co/heB1Z8Ymcq
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414329958752268
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414326234292229
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
… of freedom from physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws? (Meaning: Scarcity, amorality, self-interest, reciprocity, proportionality, mutation, genetic load, the necessity of natural selection, and necessity of defeating the red queen?) https://t.co/f8EJZwXhA1
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414326234292229
The abrahamic method of argument (abrahamic religions, marxism-to-pomo-to-PC-Woke) uses the female method of argument. Just as we can determine the sex of the author of almost any passage, we can tell the sex or at least sex bias in cognition of anyone arguing.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 20:48:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411064366670221318
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411062539341946888
Make it happen. Michael will have to get over the fact that I’m attacking Abrahamism like I attack sophistry and pseudoscience from every culture – not people. If he can, we can have a discussion that’s beneficial to man. Unfortunately, intellectuals are building islands again.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-29 21:44:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1409991140435271698
Reply addressees: @DigitalHeretyk @michaelmalice
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1409990181273300993
The Abrahamic pseudoscientific movement’s most interesting use of terminology was to replace FAITH (supernatural sophistry) with THEORY (pseudoscientific sophistry), and in doing so poison the language of science, as they had poisoned the language of religion millennia before.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-28 15:28:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1409534173560324098
I agree with the excerpt above. IMO they came to the same realization I did, that you can’t get rid of religion, you can only limit the harms it does. I can’t imagine that kind of mental addiction but it does exist and you can’t ‘fix’ christians.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-25 23:49:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1408572996101541891
Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1408572371804454918
We know the european natural religion, in it’s three variations: proto-european (tyr), early european: germanic-baltic-slavic, and mediterranean pagan, maturing into Stoicism-Epicureanism. Before the intellectual cancer of jewish christianity. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1408570047715545088
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-25 23:47:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1408572511839821825
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1408570047715545088
I realize abrahamic method of deceit is dependent upon sophistry by conflation, and so your questions do so:
Conflates reasoning with sophistry (verbalism)
Conflates hypothesis with evidence (fictionalism)
Conflates supernatural with existential (supernaturalism)
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-25 14:41:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1408435062178205697
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1408434161430392834
In the end, ancient philosophy, as an alternative to religion, produced stoicism – the only non-false religion – and the Xians destroyed it. Later philosophy produced a dead end. Only science survived the test of time. And the philosophers created pseudoscience to undermine it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-25 01:43:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1408239307970711561
Reply addressees: @philosophytweet
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1408235544308600836