Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • “It’s surprising that some Christians still follow Curt Doolittle.”– Odd. Let’s

    –“It’s surprising that some Christians still follow Curt Doolittle.”–

    Odd. Let’s examine:
    It’s a question of priorities.
    1. Physical Science (true)
    2. Natural Law (good)
    3. Christian Ethics (virtuous)
    ..are all compatible.
    But only in that order.
    Any other order requires you lie to yourself and others.
    If you claim you are a christian with some other order of priorities, then I question your intelligence, ability, and opinion. And as such your value as a participant in political (formal) rather than personal and social (informal) decisions.
    That does not mean you cannot equally preserve the supernatural heaven, hell, angels and god. It means that you, as directed by St Aquinas, render unto science, render unto law, and render unto god their due.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 23:36:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822054256716779520

  • “It’s surprising that some Christians still follow Curt Doolittle.”– Odd. Let’s

    –“It’s surprising that some Christians still follow Curt Doolittle.”–

    Odd. Let’s examine:
    It’s a question of priorities.
    1. Physical Science (true)
    2. Natural Law (good)
    3. Christian Ethics (virtuous)
    ..are all compatible.
    But only in that order.
    Any other order requires you lie to yourself and others.
    If you claim you are a christian with some other order of priorities, then I question your intelligence, ability, and opinion. And as such your value as a participant in political (formal) rather than personal and social (informal) decisions.
    That does not mean you cannot equally preserve the supernatural heaven, hell, angels and god. It means that you, as directed by St Aquinas, render unto science, render unto law, and render unto god their due.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 23:33:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822053744504172545

  • sorry, but religion in the sense of supernatural religion has failed – it will c

    sorry, but religion in the sense of supernatural religion has failed – it will continue its decline until it hits the margin of about twenty percent, most of whom will be women, because supernatural religion requires an empathic mind (not a systemic one despite the efforts of theologians), and the modern world cannot tolerate the supernatural and occult except at that margin, because it is systemically inconsistent with observed existence.

    Supernatural Religion evolved to suppress neuroticism (negative thoughts) and spread by men who used it to regulate women and simple men.

    It doesn’t work any longer.

    China benefited from it’s retention of philosophy and evasion of abrahamic and hindu religion. It could tolerate buddhism which is more a way of life stated in pseudoscience than a religion.

    Reply addressees: @23snakehead


    Source date (UTC): 2024-08-08 19:56:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821636600331116544

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821635439838564660

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: IT’S JUST BEYOND BELIEF faith > belief > trust > confidence >

    RT @ThruTheHayes: IT’S JUST BEYOND BELIEF

    faith > belief > trust > confidence > certainty

    Faith can be categorized as, short of belief. T…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-08-03 18:50:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819807974858366990

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: BE LIKE JESUS FLIP TABLES AND WHIP BANKERS IMPROPER AND IRRESP

    RT @ThruTheHayes: BE LIKE JESUS FLIP TABLES AND WHIP BANKERS

    IMPROPER AND IRRESPONSIBLE IMITATION IS IMMORAL

    Imitate Jesus. There wasn’t…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-08-02 23:24:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819514523683864592

  • There is an argument for such, but only for the common folk. Does it matter that

    There is an argument for such, but only for the common folk. Does it matter that the common folk have such a belief available to them?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-08-01 19:31:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819093676913787364

    Reply addressees: @dbabbitt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819093308578127934

  • Again given the possible constitution of a god or gods: 1 – Outside the universe

    Again given the possible constitution of a god or gods:
    1 – Outside the universe
    2 – Of the universe
    3 – Within the universe
    4 – A consequence of mankind
    5 – A product of mankind.
    If the Laws of Nature, including the Natural Law, is consistent regardless of that constitution, what is the difference in our attribution of origin when the ‘commands’ are the same no matter which?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-08-01 15:17:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819029804902952961

  • Q: –“Why has no one made a humanist ideology that acts as a surrogate religion.

    Q: –“Why has no one made a humanist ideology that acts as a surrogate religion.”–
    CORRECT ANSWER:
    1) What we call religions consist of ritual construction of neural relations that serve as a means of uncertainty and suppression alienation exaggerated by our degree of neuroticism (sensitivity to negative emotions).
    2) Religions and Religious Substitutes require Myths (framings that contextualize experience and understanding), rituals (means of repetitious reinforcement), social reinforcement (disalienation reinforcement), because the purpose of religion is compensation for alienation that increases rather rapidly as post-hunter-gatherer society increases, and the continuous social reinforcement at every moment of the day decreases.
    3) The means of social reinforcement must be available to the individuals who pursue the set of ‘myths’, ‘rituals’ and ‘social reinforcement’.
    4) As such as human ability, knowledge, understanding increase, then we should and do experience the emergence of a spectrum of ‘religion’ that provides accessibility to the broad spectrum of human psychological vulnerabilities, intellectual capacity, and education sufficient to grasp the mythology, method, and a population sufficient to reinforce it.
    5) stoicism is the optimum religion (the collection of the ‘greek way’) however it is unavailable to the empathic, neurotic, ignorant, unsuccessful, and undisciplined). Christianity is accessible with little other than ritual repetition. Same for Islam. Yet christianity is currently practiced as an entire spectrum from humanist down to fundamentalist, and even the unstructured occultist.
    6) So we have produced humanist variations on both the greek (stoic) and christian (secular humanist) versions but because the demands of the classes and sexes vary it is not yet possible to form organically a religion as we have in the past.
    7) As such the next ‘religion’ will require intentional training (costly) which will require state institutional support and indoctrination and it will be very close to the combination of cognitive behavioral therapy (real world actions of desensitization) stoicism (ritual virtues of self regulation and self improvement), christianity(elimination of hatred, extension of kinship love, personal acts of charity at personal expense, and exhaustion of forgiveness before retaliation.)
    8) As I have stated repeatedly the only non false religion is the natural religion to which the Japanese have preserved the surviving example: Nature, State (only nation state), Hero, and Ancestor worship, where worship consist of thanks for the transfer of capital from the past to the present – because we are in fact indebted to nature, state, hero, and ancestor. In that model god (simple anthropomorphism) and nature (more abstract anthropomorphism) are synonymous.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-27 21:55:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817317796172230656

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817254988084838891

  • RT @meghaverma_art: “Why do you worship the west?” I don’t worship the west. I w

    RT @meghaverma_art: “Why do you worship the west?”

    I don’t worship the west. I worship God. And traditional western civilization lives mor…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-23 16:20:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815783983939998151

  • MUSK: CULTURAL CHRISTIANITY – HOOPLA OVER NOTHING There are two possible interpr

    MUSK: CULTURAL CHRISTIANITY – HOOPLA OVER NOTHING
    There are two possible interpretations of ‘Cultural Christian’.
    1) The first is that it’s all but impossible to be ethnically european raised in european civilization and NOT be indoctrinated subconsciously into culturally christianity , whether consciously or not – our norms traditions values include an admixture of early european, classical, germanic, and Christian metaphysical presumptions and values. This is why
    2) The second, consists of your understanding of its legitimacy in the sequence:
    |Religiosity|: Fundamentalist <> Devoted <> Traditionalist <> Philosophical <> Cultural <> Unconscious Conformity.
    So consciously cultural or unconsciously it doesn’t really matter, you’re thinking and speaking christian ethics (Even if they are largely early european and classical ethics in christian form). This is why even wicca and pagans are transparently spreading christian values even if in the form of naturalism.
    Cheers
    CD
    https://t.co/NEKA4lSuFJ


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-23 15:30:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815771598822981632