I love these young crazy passionate activist kids. They just need some adult messaging, strategy, and organization. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 23:12:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411100550419161091
I love these young crazy passionate activist kids. They just need some adult messaging, strategy, and organization. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 23:12:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411100550419161091
I know Biden’s a sock puppet for the political mafia, but that idiot makes Carter look like master and commander of the seas. Seriously.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 22:01:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411082578354913288
Well the question is instead how do you produce the commons that you call ‘property’ at any scale sufficient to prevent others from taking it from you.
I mean, what you’re doing is just complaining about something you know can’t be changed. It’s ideology of a powerless minority.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 21:19:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411071937388888066
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella @aidengregg @NotGovernor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411069801850679301
But if we avoid the deception of Critique, and we try to argue how to produce a libertarian condition, that brings us back to (b) how do you construct one.
So it’s evading the problem. https://t.co/zHkDCRpkme




Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 21:12:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411070227719335942
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella @NotGovernor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411066548303929349
The thing to debate is whether any variation on a libertarian polity can be brought into existence and whether it can survive competition.
It can’t and can’t.
So the question is, if we want the minimum aggression against our demonstrated interests (demonstrated property), how?
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 20:44:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411063145792212993
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella @NotGovernor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411061486047399939
Libertarianism isn’t responsible for the commons – it all but outlaws it. Aristocracy is responsible for the commons. It’s just taking responsibility for the commons given that the commons provide disproportionate (greater) returns over market production.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 19:00:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411037012321308682
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411034992680054793
I know what libertarian principles are, and I know why it’s a false promise, and I know why libertarians can’t form (ever) a libertarian polity, nor sustain one, and this is simple behavioral economics. It can’t happen. So if it can’t why distract people with the false promise?
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 18:42:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411032455969181699
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411031310588690437
That’s ridiculous. (a) there is no ‘big ammo’. (b) they can’t meet supply. (c) identity politics begins with Gramsci’s conversion of marxism to neo-marxism, and the Jewish-French conversion of neo-marxism to postmodernism: “A War against institutions of cultural production”.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 18:23:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411027826761945088
Reply addressees: @james1chas3 @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1410902142714515464
16. So despite the demand from the nitwittery for salvation from gradual disenfranchisement and extermination, and the emotional and psychological rewards of the attention they give – we need a clean break from the nitwittery who only serve to prevent awareness of our work.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 17:00:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006934967332865
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006933948063745
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
15. We cannot convert the disenfranchised ‘nitwittery’ into a movement. We tried. (Call it a folly but at least we tried to move them from fundamentalism and naziism back into rule of law.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411006933948063745
15. We cannot convert the disenfranchised ‘nitwittery’ into a movement. We tried. (Call it a folly but at least we tried to move them from fundamentalism and naziism back into rule of law.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 17:00:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006933948063745
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006932920512517
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
14. It was useful to try to repeat the strategy of the Mises institute’s success on the web before 2010 (Thanks to Jeff). But with the capture of social media if not all the internet by the left, and the demonstrated ‘nitwittery’ of the right, the strategy has failed.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411006932920512517