I’m a fan of Putin but not of Russian poly-logicalism that they inherited from the Bolsheviks.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-08 18:32:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1468649811876458497
I’m a fan of Putin but not of Russian poly-logicalism that they inherited from the Bolsheviks.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-08 18:32:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1468649811876458497
Russia’s Putin is making the case, against all of european history, that the west is preventing the emergence of competing powers. This is of course a moral deceit. The west has ALWAYS prevented the emergence of competing powers or the Austro Hungarians and HRE would still exist.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-08 18:32:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1468649638299422723
Clips: The Optimal Polity https://youtu.be/zAYbAsU7nKs
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-08 14:55:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1468595129942523910
Reluctant Opinion on Mandates
https://youtu.be/ExR4js1ylvQ
(Curse Words Warning)
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-08 14:38:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1468590811021463555
This is the political science equivalent of ‘watching the pennies and the dollars will watch themselves’ or ‘maintain legal intolerances like jaywalking and maners and the morals and ethics will take care of themselves.’ https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1468359412972724226
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-07 23:20:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1468359686965669895
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1468359412972724226
Boost of @Afterrthought The fire rises
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-06 05:55:46 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107398564409608548
@Tayai It’s just a matter of time. If it lasts more than six months it will be worse. I’ve sort of agreed not to talk about this very much. But this isn’t russia. cities are ghettos.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-06 05:54:38 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107398435840700997
No equivalent. Closest would be ‘committed conservatives’
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-04 22:59:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1467267270774865927
Reply addressees: @BoonnHem
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1467254171157995520
Why can’t we have a head of state that is as competent and empirical as Putin?
Top Issues:
#1 Demographics (Reproductive rate)
#2 Economic Fortress of Sovereignty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPcemzW00rI
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-04 17:30:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1467184486366515214
THE END OF THE NEED FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Well, my broader point is that (a) american prosperity is due to the combination of english law and selling off a continent and putting it to productive work. (b) american technology is largely english and german in origin, (c) and like Rome vs Athens, superior military organization and subsequent administration. (d) and subject to the same failure: that majority middle class (productive) civilizations over extend commerce (profits) beyond the reach of the military and cultural discipline that made that prosperity possible.
The unity of the USA was only possible because of the competition between the extraordinary value of continental expansion, and the extraordinary risk that the european powers would either claim those territories, bring the states into more wars, or reconquer the continent.
The industrial revolution allowed the use of cheap american defense (a huge island), its vast coastline, extraordinary rivers, cheap land, resources, and labor, to do to Europe what china has economically done to the USA.
So, in the absence of external forces, given the loss of competitive economic advantage, given the over-expansion of imperial government that resulted from the world wars, and the false promise that European domestic policy was possible in the USA, and the j-war on culture, there exists no reason for a federal government that has any responsibility other than (a) military (b) foreign policy (c) facilitating physical trade between states, (d) resolution of disputes between states. And that otherwise there is negative value to the federal govt.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-04 02:56:20 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107386410119859291