Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • FROM: Helikzhan @curtd We continue as we have. 1. Informing 2. Boycotting 3. Wit

    FROM: Helikzhan
    @curtd We continue as we have.

    1. Informing
    2. Boycotting
    3. Withdrawing from their orgs
    4. Reorganizing under our own banners, economy and culture.
    5. Providing the existential threat to their survival by simply not engaging with it.

    RESPONSE BY:
    Curt Doolittle (PRO) @curtd Original Gabber

    @Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the past century and a half, because they are entirely passive – we lack teh monarchy and universal military as means of organizational defense against the female means of social destruction of knowledge, tradition, and institutions. What you’re suggesting is a repetition of the libertarian fantasy that incremental separation is possible. It’s not. Libertarians are always wrong. Just as much as marxists are always wrong. For the same reason. There is no means of voluntary separation from kelptoparasites who depend on that parasitism and absence of competition.

    1) The first existential threat to the enemy is forcible political separation, or forcibile political domination. Separation is superior becuase it eliminates the cost of spending the next 1000 years genetically pacifying their instinct for feminine kleptoparasitism. We simply separate, restore our evolutionary velocity and high trust by restoring society-as-army, under rule of law, and family as the purpose of policy, and leave them behind. There is no downside to this strategy because it takes the moral high ground.

    2) The second existential threat is conquest and rule – which honestly is something we don’t want. Let them suicide into favellas. The problem with this strategy is that it makes the entire planet fear you and boycott you.

    3) The third existential threat is one we find morally reprehensible – which is the even higher cost of deportation, displacement, or elimination. The problem with this method is that it makes the entire planet war with you.

    Those are our choices. They are the only choices. Everything else is wet-dreams of adolescent boys afraid to pay the high cost of obtaining their sovereignty by the only means sovereignty is ever produced: the organized application of violence we call an ‘army’.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:54:11 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661495572644959

  • @Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the pas

    @Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the past century and a half, because they are entirely passive – we lack teh monarchy and universal military as means of organizational defense against the female means of social destruction of knowledge, tradition, and institutions. What you’re suggesting is a repetition of the libertarian fantasy that incremental separation is possible. It’s not. Libertarians are always wrong. Just as much as marxists are always wrong. For the same reason. There is no means of voluntary separation from kelptoparasites who depend on that parasitism and absence of competition.

    The first existential threat to the enemy is forcible political separation, or forcibile political domination. Separation is superior becuase it eliminates the cost of spending the next 1000 years genetically pacifying their instinct for feminine kleptoparasitism. We simply separate, restore our evolutionary velocity and high trust by restoring society-as-army, under rule of law, and family as the purpose of policy, and leave them behind. There is no downside to this strategy because it takes the moral high ground.

    The second existential threat is conquest and rule – which honestly is something we don’t want. Let them suicide into favellas. The problem with this strategy is that it makes the entire planet fear you and boycott you.

    The third existential threat is one we find morally reprehensible – which is the even higher cost of deportation, displacement, or elimination. The problem with this method is that it makes the entire planet war with you.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:51:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661485843813618

  • ENDING THE FEMALE-JEWISH MEANS OF CRIMINALITY, SEDITION, AND WAR I’ve explained

    ENDING THE FEMALE-JEWISH MEANS OF CRIMINALITY, SEDITION, AND WAR

    I’ve explained in detail why we are vulnerable to the feminine means of undermining by seduction. So, now we have the ‘science’ of female-jewish destruction available. Fundamentally, this means that it’s genetic as well as cultural. And that the jewish destruction from within, first by supernatual christianity, and second by pseudoscientific marxism-neomarxism-pomo-pc/woke both make use of the female means of anti-social conflict and warfare.

    So, the question of their intrinsic evil, and the source of their intrinsic evil, is settled. But so is why our unique trifunctional high-trust civilization is vulnerable to warfare against our institutions of cultural production, using the female means of antisocial behavior.

    The thing is – that by knowing what makes us vulnerable, we can as equally suppress their means of crime, sediction, and war against our culture, as we have the male methods of anti-social behavior and warfare. It’s not even hard.

    That is. … it’s not even hard if we sieze sufficient political power to implement the necessary legal and economic reforms.

    -cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 14:49:27 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661005121345146

  • RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle Values are intermediate capital… The probl

    RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle Values are intermediate capital… The problem with civic nationalism is that it intuits a need to defe…

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 19:41:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484249855954505739

  • Background: I asked how me and my (small) organization would differ from Bannon

    Background: I asked how me and my (small) organization would differ from Bannon

    Background: I asked how me and my (small) organization would differ from Bannon and his (large).

    ENDING THE FALSE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN CIVIC AND ETHNONATIONALISM.

    (The supermajority of Europeans can practice scientific social, economic, political, and group evolutionary strategy that the enemies pejoratively call ‘whiteness’. Only a super-minority of non-Europeans can do so.)

    I don’t do ideology. I do science. The science says what it says. Restore scientific law, we call the constitution of natural law, and in doing so restore a ‘scientific’ civilization, including the unscientific method by which christianity indoctrinates the common folk into the scientific basis of optimum social order: the solution to the prisoner’s dilemma: the exhaustion of forgivness by the extension of kinship love.

    The thing is, you need a homogenous ethnocentric polity to pay the cost of the purely scientific european group evolutionary strategy of continuous innovation, application, and adaptation to the continuous discovery the laws of the universe: the only laws any god if there is one ever made.

    All we have to so is raise our standards (which my work on restoring the constitution and completing what’s missing from it), and we will drive out the enemy and the inferior simply because they cannot tolerate the demand for people of good character that put family, society, polity, nation, and race before their individual hedonism.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 17:41:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107656019027848876

  • Ending the False Dichotomy Between Civic and Ethnonationalistm. (the supermajori

    Ending the False Dichotomy Between Civic and Ethnonationalistm. (the supermajori

    Ending the False Dichotomy Between Civic and Ethnonationalistm.
    (the supermajority of Europeans can practice scientific social, economic, political, and group evolutionary strategy that the enemies pejoratively call ‘whiteness’. Only a super-minority of non-Europeans can do so.) https://t.co/vBDjvaAIjE

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 17:33:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484217485670899712

  • That’s probably the net of it, isn’t it? Hmm… I would say the highest loyalty

    That’s probably the net of it, isn’t it? Hmm… I would say the highest loyalty would be to values and only loyalty to blood can achieve it. Thus ending the false dichotomy between them by converting from philosophical-ideological to scientific-empirical.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 17:28:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484216197923151874

    Reply addressees: @ReviloOliver4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484191551039361025

  • @rfnarchive @RadioFreeNorthwest That’s why scale matters. It’s why ‘small’ fails

    @rfnarchive@RadioFreeNorthwest That’s why scale matters. It’s why ‘small’ fails. Scale provides incentive for trade, threat for not trading, and resources to fight for not trading, and population to conquer not-traders.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 01:36:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107652225114196178

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle People have been conditioned to pursue equalit

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle People have been conditioned to pursue equality. This puts opposites into conflict around disparities.

    N…

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-19 18:25:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483868326032031750

  • @tmomoney @RadioFreeNorthwest NJP. Good people. Good start. Necessary but insuff

    @tmomoney@RadioFreeNorthwest NJP. Good people. Good start. Necessary but insufficient Program. More of a platform statement. Needs a list of reforms and how.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-19 18:13:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107650483545196918