Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Sure. Because the answer is empirically trivial on one hand, fragility on the se

    Sure. Because the answer is empirically trivial on one hand, fragility on the second, and strategic on third. IOW democratic countries are not capable of making these decisions if it’s possible to pander to the ignorance of the population for preservation of political influence.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 20:38:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491511778823622656

    Reply addressees: @IamtheMKC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491510696516988930

  • Boost of @rfnarchive @Wanderers_Choice While there are portions of the National

    Boost of @rfnarchive@Wanderers_Choice While there are portions of the National Socialist platform I like, maybe even very large portions, I think Harold Covington stated it well with:

    “It is a mistake to base a 21st century political strategy on anything from the 19th or 20th centuries, but a few limited parallels are germane.”

    @curtd@RadioFreeNorthwest


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 19:48:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769778503643298

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769679965980910


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    @Wanderers_Choice @RadioFreeNorthwest It’s insufficient for anything other than the building of consensus among people who already agree. After that you still have to obtain and hold territory, trade routes, organize infrastructure and bureaucracies, a military, and form a system of government, taxation, and education necessary to preserve it. And even among yourselves who arleady agree you need a means of decidability to produce organizatoins rather than continuous conflict by ignorant opinions of those oveconfident young men who are more than willing to double down on fragments of knowledge.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769679965980910

  • @Wanderers_Choice @RadioFreeNorthwest It’s insufficient for anything other than

    @Wanderers_Choice@RadioFreeNorthwest It’s insufficient for anything other than the building of consensus among people who already agree. After that you still have to obtain and hold territory, trade routes, organize infrastructure and bureaucracies, a military, and form a system of government, taxation, and education necessary to preserve it. And even among yourselves who arleady agree you need a means of decidability to produce organizatoins rather than continuous conflict by ignorant opinions of those oveconfident young men who are more than willing to double down on fragments of knowledge.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 19:26:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769679965980910

  • @Wanderers_Choice You’re only half right. compromising on internal virtue signal

    @Wanderers_Choice You’re only half right. compromising on internal virtue signaling in exchange for external victory you merely have to continue to convert from ideology to policy statements. Now, that’s effectively what I’ve done. (for you, for us). Because the only thing preventing victory that I can see is you (collectively) need to complete that transition from nazi ideologques to ethnonationalist, rule of law, socialists. It’s that bit in the middle the germans failed to solve, including Schmidt, and forced them to rely on a dictator, who put ideology over empirical evidence, and by doing so lost for all of us.

    I don’t know how to convine you to convert from (feminine) Feels to (masculine) Reals but that’s what I’m really saying. Feelings are for tribes. Thoughts are for polities.

    I just don’t know how to help you get there other than producing the constitution, law, policy, and arguments you need, that are in the anglo rather than german tradition – thereby eradicating the nazi association.

    And there. You made me say it in public. So now i’ll get attacked for the strategy. lol

    ( cc: @RadioFreeNorthwest note last few paragraphs )


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:34:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769473088517614

  • @volkischexe We had a ‘leader’ by the name of John Mark, who used my ideas to de

    @volkischexe We had a ‘leader’ by the name of John Mark, who used my ideas to develop millions of followers, but gave up on the right when the moron-masses turned on him (us), because they wanted us to create another cville of jan6th using violence, and we were using the gandhi strategy of just get on stage state the message and don’t take the bait. Because the right always fails by taking the bait. And the left only has one strategy: taking the bait.

    John made high quality videos, he wore a black suit and red motorcyle helmet, and he would have emerged as our politician. Unfortunately, the right is a lot of talk but doesn’t fund, so he couldn’t clear enough revenue to make it worth losing his career over, and couldn’t tolerate the threats made by the FBI against his family.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:23:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769428797501563

  • LESSONS LEARNED THIS WINTER 1) National socialists are right, and they’ve taken

    LESSONS LEARNED THIS WINTER

    1) National socialists are right, and they’ve taken over the policy wing of the right from the libertarians, who were (of course) influneced by jewish (rothbard) libertarianism instead of anglo (imperial) rule of law and german ethnic nationalism. So the ‘smart guys’ appear to be limited to this small sector.
    But they can’t cleans the movement by divorcing themselves from the nazi past. Until leadership can do that, and cleans that from their ranks, they will be percieved as threat to the broader public who is interestd inpolicy not ‘power ideology’.

    2) The Nazi / Ethnonationalists are just well poisonders that are so angry that they can’t just shut up and ask what they can do to help other than vent their spleens of rage on anyone who has .0001% variation from their individual presumptions of comprehension – which is usually low. SO these dumb fcking rude boys poison the well so that we can’t organize anything.

    3) The fundamentalist christans appear to be the internal enemy on the right, just as the jews are the internal enemy in the civilization, just as that one third of mentally ill neurotic white women we call liberals are the natural allies of the enemy of our civilization

    4) The libertarians are a dead movement. Which is good. Forever. We have captured the few worth having. The rest are still little boys hoping to escape payment for the commons, while pretending their virtuous. They’re just marxists of the commons instead of marxists of private property. Same scam different take.

    5) The civnats are slowly getting there but they won’t switch until the next crisis, which is arriving, as expected, on schedule.

    6) And the majority of the population just wants to know what to do.

    The only thing I’ve learned is that the ‘smart fraction’ is now out of the libertarian camp and in the NS camp but because they don’t have the discipline to clean the ranks they can’t scale.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:18:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769412103968751

  • WHAT HAPPENED TO JOHN MARK? (PINNED) (a) Recognition that uniting the right fact

    WHAT HAPPENED TO JOHN MARK?
    (PINNED)

    (a) Recognition that uniting the right factions was impossible because of the unsophistication, lack of maturity, and poisoning of social media as a vehicle for uniting the right (b) insufficient income from the audience to go public, pay the cost of production, and evolve into a politician for uniting the right, (c) the FBI showing up at his home and threateining his family.

    The right doesn’t fund. Doesn’t show. Isn’t possible to organize. Consists of factions,. Most of thse factions are either of ideological of supernatural religions, rather than of political policy.

    The movement wasn’t mine it was John’s. He just couldn’t be the face of it until revenues made it possible. We got ‘canceled’ by the right just like the left cancels the right. And then the FBI made it impossible for him to continue.

    It’s not complicated. But the underlyig problem is that the right is full of male losers who destroy the ability to unite behind a solution that will not cause every single other person in the polity to prefer submission to the left over the kind of stupid shithead that poisons social media on the right.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:09:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769375520766476

  • @BasedPopulistSerb @AngeloJohnGage(a) Recognition that uniting the right faction

    @BasedPopulistSerb@AngeloJohnGage(a) Recognition that uniting the right factions was impossible because of the unsophistication, lack of maturity, and poisoning of social media as a vehicle for uniting the right (b) insufficient income from the audience to go public, pay the cost of production, and evolve into a politician for uniting the right, (c) the FBI showing up at his home and threateining his family.

    The right doesn’t fund. Doesn’t show. Isn’t possible to organize. Consists of factions,. Most of thse factions are either of ideological of supernatural religions, rather than of political policy.

    My movement wasn’t mine it was John’s. He just could’t be the face of it until revenues made it possible. We got ‘canceled’ by the right just like the left cancels the right. And then the FBI made it impossible for him to continue.

    It’s not complicated. But the underlyig problem is that the right is full of male losers who destroy the ability to unite behind a solution that will not cause every single other person in the polity to prefer submission to the left over the kind of stupid shithead that poisons social media on the right.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 18:10:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763716830296573

  • Boost of @curtd @BasedPopulistSerb @AngeloJohnGage(a) Recognition that uniting t

    Boost of @curtd@BasedPopulistSerb@AngeloJohnGage(a) Recognition that uniting the right factions was impossible because of the unsophistication, lack of maturity, and poisoning of social media as a vehicle for uniting the right (b) insufficient income from the audience to go public, pay the cost of production, and evolve into a politician for uniting the right, (c) the FBI showing up at his home and threateining his family.

    The right doesn’t fund. Doesn’t show. Isn’t possible to organize. Consists of factions,. Most of thse factions are either of ideological of supernatural religions, rather than of political policy.

    My movement wasn’t mine it was John’s. He just could’t be the face of it until revenues made it possible. We got ‘canceled’ by the right just like the left cancels the right. And then the FBI made it impossible for him to continue.

    It’s not complicated. But the underlyig problem is that the right is full of male losers who destroy the ability to unite behind a solution that will not cause every single other person in the polity to prefer submission to the left over the kind of stupid shithead that poisons social media on the right.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 18:10:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763797052121800

  • AGAIN, HOW RUSSIAN DEMOGRAPHICS ARE DRIVING BEHAVIOR And why I argue Russians an

    AGAIN, HOW RUSSIAN DEMOGRAPHICS ARE DRIVING BEHAVIOR
    And why I argue Russians and Americans need to learn to be truthful with one another to HELP each other survive the demographic crisis for the global population of EUROPEANS.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4Yrn29v5F8


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 16:28:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491086447402962948