You may kneel before me, Zod and beg for my blessings!
F—kwit brigade of generation z wanna be toddler nazis.
lol.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 05:47:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628994898803163137
Reply addressees: @Moltom4 @jamesfoley57
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628993527471345664
IF THERE IS A WORLD WAR III – THIS IS WHY.
We are seeing the long tradition of modernization that replaces involuntary empires with voluntary nation-states allied federations, produce the dying gasps of the last three decadent civilizations: the Muslims, the Chinese, and the Russians – all three who are still clinging to their evil, corrupt, decadent, archaic agrarian age empires, Each, like poor France, wishing it was once again in glory by the defeat of neighbors.
If we do have world war three, it will just be the completion of world wars 1 and 2 – the death of empires. The birth of new nation states. In the long and necessary evolution into the optimum polity for mankind: small homogenous, low power distance, egalitarian, equalitarian, redistributive, nation states, under rule of law and participatory government for the benefit of all.
THE EXPLOSIONS OF TECHNOLOGY IN HISTORY
The Agrarian expansion out of Anatolia
The Bronze Age expansion out of Mesopotamia
The Indo-European expansion out of the Steppe
The Greco-Roman expansion out of the Med.
The Germanic Expansion south.
The Germanic Restoration via the Hansa
The Classical Restoration by return of Aristotle
The LIterary Expansion due to the printing press
The Age of Sail because of the Ottoman Conquest
The Eviction of the Corrupt Church from Germanic Lands.
The Empirical Revolution
The Atlantic Expansion
The British Invention of the Modern State
… French Catholic Resistance to Modernity
… German Resistance to Modernity
… Jewish Resistance to Modernity
… Russian Resistance to Modernity
The agrarian, commercial, financial and industrial revolutions.
The Expansion of the modern, ethno, national state.
… The Chinese, Indian, Muslim Resistance to modernity.
The World Wars to End Agrarian Empires.
The End of Involuntary Agrarian Empires and the birth of Voluntary Industrial Federations.
The European ‘explosion’ of modernity spread worldwide.
The European explosion of prosperity dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty , starvation, disease, suffering, and early death.
Each of these ‘explosions’ spread across Europe. The natural consequence of prosperity is the utility of small, homogenous, nation states in competition and cooperation with one another. minimizing internal conflict and cooperation.
You blame Europeans for doing the best for mankind across all of history, for doing it poorly. Compared to not doing it at all and continuing in their ignorance and poverty. Yet you desire the results of the Europeans. And your people flee to be with Europeans whenever possible.
The Chinese were as warlike as europeans when they were progressing. The stopped their wars, and stagnated, and fell behind.
The Indians were insufficiently warlike, and were conquered by every band of ruffians who passed by.
The Muslims never cease conquering one another. And after 800ad, began their year after year of decay. One tribe defeats the next who became decadent, defeating the next who becomes decadent and so on. Until when modernity arrived they could not adapt to it, and the only reason for their prosperity, the Silk Road, was ended by the European age of sail, railroad, truck, and airplane.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 05:45:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628994528966332416
RT @ManhattanInst: NEW: @ZachG932 & @epkaufm conclude that the uncritical promotion of left-wing racial ideology in education is having a m…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 03:43:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628963682699956226
THE ‘EVIL’ USA AND THE ‘EVIL’ EUROPEAN TROPES ARE JUST THAT.
(Doing the best poorly, is still far better than not doing the best at all.)
The USA is policing world trade for the benefit of all civilized peoples. And in doing so raised the world out of poverty – and we paid for it. All of it. Ourselves.
Our goal was to prevent another world war. The postwar agreement between the powers was that we would limit countries to their borders, and demand they focus on human rights, their economies, and joining the civilized world in prosperity.
It largely worked. But there are always bad actors.
But we have decided that its fruitless. So that the world must return to 19th century trade, and that the developing world will descend into relative poverty and starvation, and be victims of the remaining totalitarians. Our only goal now is to repatriate industry to north America, and to increase the security of our Kin in Europe, and allies in east asia. And then protect our allies until our withdrawal has been achieved.
This is what America First Means. We will no longer police the world, and be blamed for policing the world. Instead, we can return to the conflict of civilizations, the war over trade routes between empires, and end the ‘free trade’ that the Europeans have spent four hundred years bringing into existence.
You’re going to get what you want.
But you’re getting what comes as a consequence of what you want as well.
And those of us who understand these things are perfectly happy to observe that those who are ignorant of history are the victims of the cycles of history.
I’m perfectly happy to watch the ungrateful burn.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 02:06:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628939491523145728
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628937135158960129
#UkraineRussianWar
SURVEY https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1628894208588128256
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 00:57:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628922126446075907
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1628894208588128256
DOES ANYONE WANT TO PLAY XI-JINPING’S FRIDAY RU-UKRAINE “PEACE PLAN BINGO?”
(Poll)
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 23:06:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628894208588128256
I’M A UNIVERSALIST (REALLY), I LOVE HUMANITY – AND ANGRY PEOPLE MAKE ME EXASPERATED.
(my political position isn’t what you’d think.)
I’m a conservative libertarian anglo in the classical liberal tradition. Somewhere close to Jefferson. But what does that mean? It doesn’t mean I hate anyone. I’m frustrated by plenty of people classes, groups, and races. I’m Exasperated. Tired. Saddened. But I don’t do hate. And I’m (perhaps foolishly) optimistic. Christian “love” worked on me.
I advocate for universal ethnocentric nation-states because they produce the highest trust, lowest power distance, least internal adversity, and greatest tolerance for the production of commons and for redistribution. That’s why.
I advocate for learning the vast differences in group capacity for high trust polities, rule of law, participatory government, markets, and continuous competition, innovation, adaptation, and evolution.
I explain that western civilization is just ‘science’ for ancient reasons. Which is why the west invented ‘science’ as a thing – because we are scientific people in the first place.
I explain that the cost of this scientific high trust polity – ‘whitness’ – is the most intellectually, emotionally, and psychologically and socially costly.
But if any society chooses to pay those costs, the benefits of ‘whiteness’ will produce the same results as they do for westerners.
Unfortunately, while my statements explain this science, and I intend them as a universal, there is a tendency to attract what we call ‘racists’ who are angry, rather than universalists who also understand that many small ethnocentric states that cooperate through trade externally, but produce the unique commons they need internally, make us all the best most peaceful most prosperous least alienated that we can possibly be.
Does that mean I would prefer to live in a country that consisted entirely of fellow ethnically European, Scandinavian, secular protestants in a constitutional monarchy with a strong constitution of natural law, and participatory government?
Of course it does.
That doesn’t mean I don’t want everyone else to have what they want too. And that requires a lot of polities – not large empires.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 22:31:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628885350780178432
BTW: I absolutely positively deny I’m a racist in any sense of the word. I simply acknowlege that ethnonationalism is the best for all, and that all attempts at diversity – at least any diversity that includes the lower classes, or any diversity that opposes full integration is…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 20:53:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628860582429327364
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @LiberalsRBorg @FightRight8 @nbreavington
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628855771382403072
Racist, or ethnonationalist?
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 20:42:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628857833981714434
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @LiberalsRBorg @FightRight8 @nbreavington
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628855771382403072
THE NAZI TROPE (GODWIN’S LAW) IS EXHAUSTED
(Countersignaling)
National Socialism was a counter-revolution against World Communism: the communist total war (secularization of abrahamic religion) against nations.
– As an ideology of national total war against world communism’s total war against nations, it was innovative, effective, useful, and without American intervention, would likely have been successful, at least eventually, had it succeeded.
– Note that small homogenous nation-states are high-trust polities, that constantly advance in the economy, science, technology, rights, and privileges – and large diverse religious or ideological empires are low-trust polities that stagnate (middle east, India, China).
– So regardless of whether communism, socialism leftism, progressivism, American liberalism, all small ethnocentric nation-states produce the optimum political order with the lowest power distance, highest trust, and most redistribution. And the only reason for scale is because you are untrustworthy or other parties are untrustworthy so you don’t trust one another – because you have not developed the high trust of small homogenous nation-states.
– Camps and Gulags are the Nazi trope, like Slavery is the American Trope, or Colonialism is the European trope – when these are common practices by every civilization in history. And even these practices among christian europeans were superior to all world alternatives.
– Everyone from National Socialists, to Communists and the British and the Anglosphere used concentration camps starting well before the world wars. For all intents and purposes, ghettos, ‘quarters’, the west bank, and the meany dislocated tent-cities today are the equivalent. And during the age of nation-states, where people relocated to their home regions, relocation was necessary to produce high-trust homogenous polities capable of democratic rule of law governments.
– Given that communism and National Socialism are simply means of conducting ‘total war’ – just as we have seen communism fail outside of total warfare conditions, national socialism would have devolved into french or german democratic socialism (mixed economies) as we have seen in the postwar era. Simply because without the threat of conquest or war, people will naturally restore their self-interest during peace as they do their collective interest during war.
– The french invented what we would call democratic socialism, and just called it socialism – governing well. The Marxists made it extremist and authoritarian – warfare instead of just governing. The nazis reacted by creating opposition to communism with greater authority to conduct warfare while maintaining the french morals.
– So I’m getting close to saying just “The nazis were mostly right, and they weren’t as wrong as the communists, and you’re just a clown for thinking otherwise.”
– Worse, what is the difference between militant communism, and subversive, seditious, left-wing liberalism other than the rate of conquest? The masculine force of communism replaced by the feminine seduction of communism. Both are suicidal. There is no difference.
-FIN-
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 18:26:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628823514869338115