Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • “I don’t blame the enemy for being what they are. I blame the man in the mirror.

    –“I don’t blame the enemy for being what they are. I blame the man in the mirror. “A lion does not trouble himself with the opinions of sheep” any more than we should trouble ourselves with the cultures and religions of civilizations that have failed so spectacularly by comparison that the very mention of them invokes either quaintness, compassion, pity, disdain, disgust, or even hatred througout all of history. So, integrate or leave. Ally or avoid. Our civilizational technology is in fact more psychologically and emotionally costly and stressful. But that is what is require for the benfits of our civilization. And oyur avoidance of those high costs is just a conspiracy to commit the crime of tax or draft evasion.”–

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:52:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632197311940968449

  • I don’t see them as mattering. I see the Marxist, Pomo, Woke Religion, the Jewis

    I don’t see them as mattering. I see the Marxist, Pomo, Woke Religion, the Jewish left in america, the Academy, enterntainment, and media, and worst of all – the vulnerability of white women and especially single white women as the carriers for the marxist-pomo-woke cult they were indoctrinated into in college. So I see it as the need for an Albagentsian Crusade to ‘purify’ our institutino of ‘heritics of the cult of hate’.

    IMO people from alien backgrounds aren’t aware why their traditional myths, histories, religion, law, customs, traditions, manners, ethics, morals, norms, have caused them to fail enough on their own that they would migrate to the west to take advantae of our superior civilization and it’s institutions and culture.

    If they are getting away with the crimes that they have been, even if those crimes are just false assumptions taught by their cultures (judaism, islam, especially, but we went thru this with the Irish and Italians as well) then it’s our job, and our duty, and wer are only capable of, putting in reforms to end their revolt against, and destruction of our culture from within.

    So I blame the man in the mirror. “A lion does not trouble himself with the opinions of sheep” any more than we should trouble ourselves with the cultures and religions of civilizations that have failed so spectacularly by comparison that the very mention of them invokes either pity, or compassion, or hatred and disdain througout all of history.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:46:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632195724346552320

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632192805715038209

  • I don’t see them as mattering. I see the Marxist, Pomo, Woke Religion, the Jewis

    I don’t see them as mattering. I see the Marxist, Pomo, Woke Religion, the Jewish left in america, the Academy, enterntainment, and media, and worst of all – the vulnerability of white women and especially single white women as the carriers for the marxist-pomo-woke cult they were indoctrinated into in college. So I see it as the need for an Albagentsian Crusade to ‘purify’ our institutino of ‘heritics of the cult of hate’.

    IMO people from alien backgrounds aren’t aware why their traditional myths, histories, religion, law, customs, traditions, manners, ethics, morals, norms, have caused them to fail enough on their own that they would migrate to the west to take advantae of our superior civilization and it’s institutions and culture.

    If they are getting away with the crimes that they have been, even if those crimes are just false assumptions taught by their cultures (judaism, islam, especially, but we went thru this with the Irish and Italians as well) then it’s our job, and our duty, and wer are only capable of, putting in reforms to end their revolt against, and destruction of our culture from within.

    So I blame the man in the mirror. “A lion does not trouble himself with the opinions of sheep” any more than we should trouble ourselves with the cultures and religions of civilizations that have failed so spectacularly by comparison that the very mention of them invokes either pity, or compassion, or hatred and disdain througout all of history.

    Reply addressees: @RobOU812Rob @TheAutistocrat

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:46:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632195724204032001

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632192805715038209

  • The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determinatio

    The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determination by self determined means, is we insure you have a choice, but you must “choose wisely”. If a people allows its government to commit such crimes against humanity, then the people are guilty of doing so, and obviously will pay the price for their poor judgement.

    Iraq initiated the problem by Invading and destroying Kuwait. American mistake was in ‘not completeing the job’ at that time. Then Iraq harassed troops and challenging the no fly zone.

    The majority of deaths were due to th esunni-shia conflict and the insurgency.

    DEATHS
    –“Deaths by cause in the iraq war:
    Coalition military forces: According to official sources, a total of 4,431 coalition military personnel, including 4,488 US troops, were killed in the Iraq War.

    Iraqi military forces: It is estimated that between 20,000 and 30,000 Iraqi military personnel were killed in the conflict.

    Iraqi civilians: The number of Iraqi civilian deaths is a subject of debate and varies widely depending on the source. Some estimates suggest that over 100,000 civilians were killed, while others put the figure much higher. The majority of civilian deaths were caused by insurgent attacks, sectarian violence, and military operations.

    Insurgents: It is difficult to estimate the number of insurgents who were killed during the conflict. However, it is believed that many thousands were killed in US-led military operations, including air strikes and ground offensives.

    Contractors and journalists: A significant number of contractors and journalists were also killed during the Iraq War. According to official figures, 318 contractors and 144 journalists were killed.’–

    INSURGENTS
    —“The insurgents included a variety of groups with different motivations and ideologies, including:

    Ba’ath Party loyalists: Many former members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath Party, which had ruled Iraq before the invasion, joined the insurgency. They were motivated by a desire to regain power and opposed the US-led occupation of the country.

    Sunni Arab militias: Sunni Arabs, who made up the majority of the Ba’ath Party and had held significant political and economic power under Saddam Hussein, also joined the insurgency. They were concerned about the loss of their influence and power under the new Shia-dominated government.

    Islamist militants: A number of Islamist groups, including Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), also joined the insurgency. These groups were motivated by a desire to establish an Islamic state in Iraq and to fight against what they saw as Western imperialism and influence in the Middle East.

    Criminal groups: Some criminal organizations joined the insurgency to take advantage of the instability and to profit from illegal activities.”—

    CAUSES
    –“There are several reasons why so many people died in the Iraq War:

    1. Military conflict: The Iraq War was a military conflict, and therefore, there were many casualties on both sides. The United States, which led the invasion, deployed a large number of troops, and faced significant resistance from Iraqi forces. The fighting was intense and led to many casualties on both sides.

    2. Insurgency and terrorism: After the initial invasion, there was a prolonged insurgency in Iraq, which was marked by terrorist attacks, suicide bombings, and other forms of violence. These attacks targeted both military personnel and civilians, resulting in a high number of deaths.

    3. Sectarian conflict: The Iraq War also exacerbated existing sectarian tensions in the country between the Shia and Sunni populations. This led to violent clashes, including attacks on civilians and mass killings.

    4. Infrastructure damage: The war caused significant damage to the country’s infrastructure, including hospitals, water treatment plants, and electrical grids. This damage led to a deterioration in public health and safety, resulting in additional deaths.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632193590846734336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632188575541256192

  • The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determinatio

    The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determination by self determined means, is we insure you have a choice, but you must “choose wisely”. If a people allows its government to commit such crimes against humanity, then the people are guilty of doing so, and obviously will pay the price for their poor judgement.

    Iraq initiated the problem by Invading and destroying Kuwait. American mistake was in ‘not completeing the job’ at that time. Then Iraq harassed troops and challenging the no fly zone.

    The majority of deaths were due to th esunni-shia conflict and the insurgency.

    DEATHS
    –“Deaths by cause in the iraq war:
    Coalition military forces: According to official sources, a total of 4,431 coalition military personnel, including 4,488 US troops, were killed in the Iraq War.

    Iraqi military forces: It is estimated that between 20,000 and 30,000 Iraqi military personnel were killed in the conflict.

    Iraqi civilians: The number of Iraqi civilian deaths is a subject of debate and varies widely depending on the source. Some estimates suggest that over 100,000 civilians were killed, while others put the figure much higher. The majority of civilian deaths were caused by insurgent attacks, sectarian violence, and military operations.

    Insurgents: It is difficult to estimate the number of insurgents who were killed during the conflict. However, it is believed that many thousands were killed in US-led military operations, including air strikes and ground offensives.

    Contractors and journalists: A significant number of contractors and journalists were also killed during the Iraq War. According to official figures, 318 contractors and 144 journalists were killed.’–

    INSURGENTS
    —“The insurgents included a variety of groups with different motivations and ideologies, including:

    Ba’ath Party loyalists: Many former members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath Party, which had ruled Iraq before the invasion, joined the insurgency. They were motivated by a desire to regain power and opposed the US-led occupation of the country.

    Sunni Arab militias: Sunni Arabs, who made up the majority of the Ba’ath Party and had held significant political and economic power under Saddam Hussein, also joined the insurgency. They were concerned about the loss of their influence and power under the new Shia-dominated government.

    Islamist militants: A number of Islamist groups, including Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), also joined the insurgency. These groups were motivated by a desire to establish an Islamic state in Iraq and to fight against what they saw as Western imperialism and influence in the Middle East.

    Criminal groups: Some criminal organizations joined the insurgency to take advantage of the instability and to profit from illegal activities.”—

    CAUSES
    –“There are several reasons why so many people died in the Iraq War:

    1. Military conflict: The Iraq War was a military conflict, and therefore, there were many casualties on both sides. The United States, which led the invasion, deployed a large number of troops, and faced significant resistance from Iraqi forces. The fighting was intense and led to many casualties on both sides.

    2. Insurgency and terrorism: After the initial invasion, there was a prolonged insurgency in Iraq, which was marked by terrorist attacks, suicide bombings, and other forms of violence. These attacks targeted both military personnel and civilians, resulting in a high number of deaths.

    3. Sectarian conflict: The Iraq War also exacerbated existing sectarian tensions in the country between the Shia and Sunni populations. This led to violent clashes, including attacks on civilians and mass killings.

    4. Infrastructure damage: The war caused significant damage to the country’s infrastructure, including hospitals, water treatment plants, and electrical grids. This damage led to a deterioration in public health and safety, resulting in additional deaths.”—

    Reply addressees: @MauriceeAubin

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632193590439886848

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632188575541256192

  • I’m not offended. I’m just coming to understand that there is a need for the you

    I’m not offended. I’m just coming to understand that there is a need for the young and lower class right that’s pessimistic about mankind because they themselves have lost moral rigor, and the older and upper class right that’s optimistic and has maintained moral rigor.

    It’s a generational and class conflict. And that why these two groups can’t communicate with one another any better than the other factions on the right.

    Now, I don’t see any chance of anything coming out of the lower class young right other than whining and larping. In no small part because they don’t have any knowledge, skills, achievements, courage or money.

    I’ve spent two weeks of my ‘vacation’ considering this and related questions of objectives and strategy. And I just don’t see how these two groups are compatible or useful to one another.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:57:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632183576065089536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632178882978672640

  • I’m not offended. I’m just coming to understand that there is a need for the you

    I’m not offended. I’m just coming to understand that there is a need for the young and lower class right that’s pessimistic about mankind because they themselves have lost moral rigor, and the older and upper class right that’s optimistic and has maintained moral rigor.

    It’s a generational and class conflict. And that why these two groups can’t communicate with one another any better than the other factions on the right.

    Now, I don’t see any chance of anything coming out of the lower class young right other than whining and larping. In no small part because they don’t have any knowledge, skills, achievements, courage or money.

    I’ve spent two weeks of my ‘vacation’ considering this and related questions of objectives and strategy. And I just don’t see how these two groups are compatible or useful to one another.

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:57:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632183575951835136

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632178882978672640

  • WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY? What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not government

    WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY?
    What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not governments) have the right to free trade, secure borders, human rights, and natural rights, in order to prevent the reconstruction of empires that abused all of the above.

    That was the ‘trade’ the USA/UK offered after the world wars: “We will sacrifice our modern economies to pay for policing the world until the age of agrarian empires is over and the age of federations of sovereign nations and people with natural rights has completed the transformation under free trade and the internaltional-rules-order (reciprocity), creating a condition where world wars made necessary by empires is never created again.”

    Where has the USA or NATO interfered where it was not to preserve this promise for all human beings?

    Why should any group of people in any government have the right or ability to deprive other people of self-determination, by self-determined means, by the natural law of reciprocity, and the human rights and obligations necessary to create and preserve that reciprocity?

    You can’t make an argument against it that doesn’t justify the extermination of you and yours (or anyone) for doing so. It’s not possible.

    The only complaint that’s possible is that the west’s experiment with ‘liberalism’ meaning placing the individual’s wants above those of the family’s needs, has been a failure because it creates decadence that destroys countries from within.

    That doesn’t change anything other than a few constitutional rules, and you get everything the rest of the world wants, EXCEPT the ability to rule those who do not want to be ruled by you. And the right to call upon the world for rescue if any group tries to rule you against your will.

    There is no possible moral argument against this policy.

    The fact that the USG and EUROPE don’t state it as clearly as I did, and instead harp on liberty and democracy is merely internal propaganda whereby our own governments try to implement policies we don’t want.

    Go ahead and argue with me. All you can say is that as the world’s police, we have made mistakes because we have too optimistic an opinion of less developed people’s abilities, development, and behavior.

    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:27:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632176029958643713

  • WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY? What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not government

    WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY?
    What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not governments) have the right to free trade, secure borders, human rights, and natural rights, in order to prevent the reconstruction of empires that abused all of the above.

    That was the ‘trade’ the USA/UK offered after the world wars: “We will sacrifice our modern economies to pay for policing the world until the age of agrarian empires is over and the age of federations of sovereign nations and people with natural rights has completed the transformation under free trade and the internaltional-rules-order (reciprocity), creating a condition where world wars made necessary by empires is never created again.”

    Where has the USA or NATO interfered where it was not to preserve this promise for all human beings?

    Why should any group of people in any government have the right or ability to deprive other people of self-determination, by self-determined means, by the natural law of reciprocity, and the human rights and obligations necessary to create and preserve that reciprocity?

    You can’t make an argument against it that doesn’t justify the extermination of you and yours (or anyone) for doing so. It’s not possible.

    The only complaint that’s possible is that the west’s experiment with ‘liberalism’ meaning placing the individual’s wants above those of the family’s needs, has been a failure because it creates decadence that destroys countries from within.

    That doesn’t change anything other than a few constitutional rules, and you get everything the rest of the world wants, EXCEPT the ability to rule those who do not want to be ruled by you. And the right to call upon the world for rescue if any group tries to rule you against your will.

    There is no possible moral argument against this policy.

    The fact that the USG and EUROPE don’t state it as clearly as I did, and instead harp on liberty and democracy is merely internal propaganda whereby our own governments try to implement policies we don’t want.

    Go ahead and argue with me. All you can say is that as the world’s police, we have made mistakes because we have too optimistic an opinion of less developed people’s abilities, development, and behavior.

    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:27:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632176029782401024

  • Hard to imagine that’s true given all the evidence everywhere in the world. Comp

    Hard to imagine that’s true given all the evidence everywhere in the world. Compare the right (christian, jeffersonian, rule of law, natural law) with left (authoritarian, socialist, communist) all are hostile to natural law, rule of law, christianity, and all the responsibiilty they require. I mean, nazis were left-socialists, ussr was left socialist, china was left communist, the failed states of south america were left-socialists. I can’t think of anyone that’s right wing (christian, jeffersonian, rule of law, natural law) that’s anywhere near as military as the left is almost everywhere – for the simple reason that naturallaw doesn’t requires we change people. Only that we police irreciprocity that violates natural law.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-04 21:50:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632136572865769472

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632134713597886469