Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN? Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, an

    WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN?
    Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, anti-national, anti-rule-of-law, anti-meritocracy, anti-reciprocity, anti-proportionality, anti-male, anti-truth.

    In other words, it’s just the newest term in the Abrahamic to Marxist Evolution of rebellion by sedition:

    The cult of envy and hatred: #marxism(class) > #neomarxism(culture) > #postmodernism (truth) > #feminism (sex) > #woke (race) > hatred sequence.

    #WokeIsHate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:00:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636110242135040006

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636109112151887880

  • WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN? Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, an

    WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN?
    Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, anti-national, anti-rule-of-law, anti-meritocracy, anti-reciprocity, anti-proportionality, anti-male, anti-truth.

    In other words, it’s just the newest term in the Abrahamic to Marxist Evolution of rebellion by sedition:

    The cult of envy and hatred: #marxism(class) > #neomarxism(culture) > #postmodernism (truth) > #feminism (sex) > #woke (race) > hatred sequence.

    #WokeIsHate

    Reply addressees: @moreywrites @bethanyshondark


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:00:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636110242013388801

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636109112151887880

  • Rate of Asian outbreeding suggests not. More likely Indian. Though given what we

    Rate of Asian outbreeding suggests not.
    More likely Indian. Though given what we saw under a black president, any non european ethnicity might demonstrate the same hostility to european institutions traditions norms and law.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 20:51:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636107948601618434

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636062601120743424

  • REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND I do my work for a

    REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND
    I do my work for all of mankind. Anglo aristocracy worked on me. I care about all humans. Christianity worked on me. It’s OK to call me names for my classism and culturism – because I am correct in my criticism of those that vary from natural law, and how much they vary from natural law, because their variance from natural law is harmful to the humans in those cultures and classes.

    Sure, I would prefer to live in a pre-woke world of homogenous white Christian northern Europeans, because we are the only people other than the Japanese and Koreans capable of the high-trust society we created over the millennia. And the calm, joy, and commons that result. I remember when we were ‘all roughly the same’ and it was a far better social and political world to be in than the world of division created by the cultural, sex, truth, and race Marxists in pursuit of generating demand for authority that only they can (of course) provide.

    But living that way – for me. That’s just a preference. We do not need to have the same preferences. We only need a market for governments that satisfy different preferences.

    Small, ethnically homogenous, secular humanist, natural law, rule of law, republican government with an independent judiciary of that law, a monarchy as judge of last resort, and houses for the classes for the negotiation of the production of commons, a universal militia to insure the above, and a mixed economy where state, semi-private, and private institutions serve the time frames of production they are capable of without the rise of corruption either private or public is simply the minimum variation from the laws of the universe that is humanly possible. Such a polity can revert to authority in war, reciprocity in peace, and redistribution in windfall, with the minimum power distance, inequality, political competition and friction, and the greatest rate of innovation and adaptation possible for man. An alliance of these states into federations provides the scale necessary for defense, insurance, and trade policy, for the benefit of all at the expense of none.

    The only route to get there is a homogenous population, universal military service, evolving a court of natural law, evolving a government of natural law, and from it a population capable of a majority middle class, and as a result the surpluses a majority middle class produces, and the redistribution made possible by the surpluses. There is no shortcut to producing the trust required to convert clan and tribe and class into a homogenous polity. Either you follow this evolutionary path or you hired Europeans to run the judiciary until you do. Because we’re the only people who do it by our nature and culture and traditions alone.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    The cult of hatred:#marxism(class) #neomarxism(culture) #postmodernism (truth) #feminism (sex) #woke (race)

    #WokeIsHate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:48:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636076848072237059

  • REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND I do my work for a

    REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND
    I do my work for all of mankind. Anglo aristocracy worked on me. I care about all humans. Christianity worked on me. It’s OK to call me names for my classism and culturism – because I am correct in my criticism of those that vary from natural law, and how much they vary from natural law, because their variance from natural law is harmful to the humans in those cultures and classes.

    Sure, I would prefer to live in a pre-woke world of homogenous white Christian northern Europeans, because we are the only people other than the Japanese and Koreans capable of the high-trust society we created over the millennia. And the calm, joy, and commons that result. I remember when we were ‘all roughly the same’ and it was a far better social and political world to be in than the world of division created by the cultural, sex, truth, and race Marxists in pursuit of generating demand for authority that only they can (of course) provide.

    But living that way – for me. That’s just a preference. We do not need to have the same preferences. We only need a market for governments that satisfy different preferences.

    Small, ethnically homogenous, secular humanist, natural law, rule of law, republican government with an independent judiciary of that law, a monarchy as judge of last resort, and houses for the classes for the negotiation of the production of commons, a universal militia to insure the above, and a mixed economy where state, semi-private, and private institutions serve the time frames of production they are capable of without the rise of corruption either private or public is simply the minimum variation from the laws of the universe that is humanly possible. Such a polity can revert to authority in war, reciprocity in peace, and redistribution in windfall, with the minimum power distance, inequality, political competition and friction, and the greatest rate of innovation and adaptation possible for man. An alliance of these states into federations provides the scale necessary for defense, insurance, and trade policy, for the benefit of all at the expense of none.

    The only route to get there is a homogenous population, universal military service, evolving a court of natural law, evolving a government of natural law, and from it a population capable of a majority middle class, and as a result the surpluses a majority middle class produces, and the redistribution made possible by the surpluses. There is no shortcut to producing the trust required to convert clan and tribe and class into a homogenous polity. Either you follow this evolutionary path or you hired Europeans to run the judiciary until you do. Because we’re the only people who do it by our nature and culture and traditions alone.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    The cult of hatred:#marxism(class) #neomarxism(culture) #postmodernism (truth) #feminism (sex) #woke (race)

    #WokeIsHate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:48:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636076848420474894

  • FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS

    FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS > ACTIVISTS.

    ROLLING ACCUSATIONS
    The Left alliances uses the technique of rolling accusations of unspecific, untestifiable, and often non-existent instuitions, thoughts words and deeds, that they can’t even articulate or apply to the individual, as a means of disapproval masquerading (lying, false accusation) under cover of free speech, without liability for defamation under the pretense, or even apology for past indiscretions.

    ENDING ROLLLING ACCUSATIONS AND MORE
    We can easily restore and expand defamation in spoken (slander), or published (libel), and remove the limit of demonstrated harm, instead returning to it simply needs to be untestifiable or false. And then we can expand it, as we have in commercial speech (fraud, libel), to public speech in the commons, to the commons, of matters common, and criminalize false accusation AND false promise in political speech.

    ALL LEFTISM IS ORGANIZED CRIME
    Since ALL lefitst claims are attempts to violate the natural, common, concurrent law, our natural righst obligations and inalienations under that law, and the capture of that law in our constitution and code, we would, rather quikcly outlaw no only the explicity political left, but the seditious left, and the means by which the left achieves funding of its war against our people and civilization by organized crime in entertainment, media, academy, finance, and state.

    ITS POSSIBLE
    Easy to do.
    You just need to ‘show up’ to make it happen.
    And the the market for the suppression of crimniality we call the courts, do their job.
    In ten years ‘its fixed’.
    That’s the amount of time legislation and regulation are required to spread through the pouplation and convert into norm and habit.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636072566849695744

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636017896370614273

  • FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS

    FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS > ACTIVISTS.

    ROLLING ACCUSATIONS
    The Left alliances uses the technique of rolling accusations of unspecific, untestifiable, and often non-existent instuitions, thoughts words and deeds, that they can’t even articulate or apply to the individual, as a means of disapproval masquerading (lying, false accusation) under cover of free speech, without liability for defamation under the pretense, or even apology for past indiscretions.

    ENDING ROLLLING ACCUSATIONS AND MORE
    We can easily restore and expand defamation in spoken (slander), or published (libel), and remove the limit of demonstrated harm, instead returning to it simply needs to be untestifiable or false. And then we can expand it, as we have in commercial speech (fraud, libel), to public speech in the commons, to the commons, of matters common, and criminalize false accusation AND false promise in political speech.

    ALL LEFTISM IS ORGANIZED CRIME
    Since ALL lefitst claims are attempts to violate the natural, common, concurrent law, our natural righst obligations and inalienations under that law, and the capture of that law in our constitution and code, we would, rather quikcly outlaw no only the explicity political left, but the seditious left, and the means by which the left achieves funding of its war against our people and civilization by organized crime in entertainment, media, academy, finance, and state.

    ITS POSSIBLE
    Easy to do.
    You just need to ‘show up’ to make it happen.
    And the the market for the suppression of crimniality we call the courts, do their job.
    In ten years ‘its fixed’.
    That’s the amount of time legislation and regulation are required to spread through the pouplation and convert into norm and habit.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636072567017553924

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636017896370614273

  • The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine

    The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine men since the dawn of time:

    “Seduction by Baiting into Hazard”
    The Female > Abrahamic > Marxist sequence

    How many women in divorce court today provoke men intentionally into physical force, then claim they are victims?

    What is the left doing to the conservatives and the government? Why are the government and the right accused of authoritarianism when they police the commons against the left. And why do we oddly have any sense of guilt about it. Yet the right can protest and it strikes fear into the hearts of government and the left?

    The question is rather odd really: why do we put up with the feminine-left false oppression narrative, when in both cases we are correcting female anti-social behavior by social economic and political harm, but suppress male anti-social behavior by physical harm?

    Wny do we pander to women and the left?
    Is it culture or instinct? It appears to be animal instinct. Becuase it’s irrational on its face.

    WHy is ‘masculine policing of the commons’ even vaguely considered authoritarian when the entire purpose of the feminine and the left is baiting into hazard: ‘the crime of construction’ just like in the inverse they egage in deceit by ‘social construction’.

    Seduction > Baiting Into Hazard > Social Construction of A Falsehood > Under cover of what? Pretense of innocence? Incompetence?

    Why do we permit feminine crime and not masculine?

    Biology we need to ‘counter’.
    That’s why I worked on the law, to equally suppress feminine criminality as we have suppressed masculine.

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 15:33:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636027899714187266

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636022835008208896

  • The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine

    The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine men since the dawn of time:

    “Seduction by Baiting into Hazard”
    The Female > Abrahamic > Marxist sequence

    How many women in divorce court today provoke men intentionally into physical force, then claim they are victims?

    What is the left doing to the conservatives and the government? Why are the government and the right accused of authoritarianism when they police the commons against the left. And why do we oddly have any sense of guilt about it. Yet the right can protest and it strikes fear into the hearts of government and the left?

    The question is rather odd really: why do we put up with the feminine-left false oppression narrative, when in both cases we are correcting female anti-social behavior by social economic and political harm, but suppress male anti-social behavior by physical harm?

    Wny do we pander to women and the left?
    Is it culture or instinct? It appears to be animal instinct. Becuase it’s irrational on its face.

    WHy is ‘masculine policing of the commons’ even vaguely considered authoritarian when the entire purpose of the feminine and the left is baiting into hazard: ‘the crime of construction’ just like in the inverse they egage in deceit by ‘social construction’.

    Seduction > Baiting Into Hazard > Social Construction of A Falsehood > Under cover of what? Pretense of innocence? Incompetence?

    Why do we permit feminine crime and not masculine?

    Biology we need to ‘counter’.
    That’s why I worked on the law, to equally suppress feminine criminality as we have suppressed masculine.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 15:33:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636027899844128771

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636022835008208896

  • RT @TomKawczynski: The danger most people miss, largely because our peer groups

    RT @TomKawczynski: The danger most people miss, largely because our peer groups tend to be comparable in age, is how much trouble is coming…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 12:04:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635975266706116608