Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Of course. But I covered it in an earlier post: 1) Trump’s Domestic Objective: E

    Of course. But I covered it in an earlier post:

    1) Trump’s Domestic Objective: End international dependency, by increase domestic autarchy, and providing employment to many, as the world trade system collapses, causing capital flight to the USA, funding our insulation from the collapse and war, leaving the USA standing as we did post WWII. In effect what I understand is that we are finally in the phase of completing what we failed to in 1945: ending the age of agrarian empires and fully transforming to the industrial age of federations of nation states.

    Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy @sqpatrick77


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 21:33:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907909391606755330

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907908346256175491

  • I assume that ‘ending the remains of empires’ (Russia, China, Iran) either econo

    I assume that ‘ending the remains of empires’ (Russia, China, Iran) either economically or militarily is going to be a costly necessity of our survival. I don’t see how it’s avoidable at all. Even if we are (as trump is trying to) redistribute the world order to those who benefit from it (most), then either way, the restructuring is going to take 30yrs. I think most historians of ‘change’ would hold about the same opinion. The world will be as different in thirty years as it was between 1850 and 1900, or between 1920 and 1950.
    The pax americana of the 20th was only possible because most of the world committed suicide in the ending of agrarian empires and the transformation to industrial states – with some empires trying to survive because they were so backward (russia, china, middle east).
    So like I said leading up to 2016, when the ball really started moving, I had some predictive ability up through 2020, but after that – well you know – timing is impossible, and outcomes are only vaguely imaginable.
    My hope is that the current wave of innovation made possible by AI produces such ‘goods’ that we have something positive to focus on in this world. Otherwise, I can easily see the collapse of trade and the generation of conflict – particularly by starvation and energy warfare – such that we enter a cyclical decline on the scale of the roman empire. Would it last as long as the cancer cuased by the rise of christianity and islam? Probably not. But it would still be ‘bad’.

    Reply addressees: @sqpatrick77


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 21:22:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907906693339725824

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907886185432719528

  • EXPLAINING TRUMP’S WORLD RESTRUCTURING BY SHOCK Trump is reorganizing world secu

    EXPLAINING TRUMP’S WORLD RESTRUCTURING BY SHOCK

    Trump is reorganizing world security and trade. He is doing it quickly and unpleasantly (to get it over with) using security and tariffs – because asking and negotiating didn’t work. To create the world order we have had three phases:
    1 – Bretton Woods Order: Subsidizing the world recovery, and limiting authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our industrial advantage)
    2 – Neoliberal Order: Subsidizing world finance and ending the authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our middle and working classes.)
    3 – Trump’s Restoration of Traditional Order: Ending the subsidies, redistributing the cost of world order, whether defense or transport and trade. (Cost: disruption of alliances, economy, and ‘deep state’ – all of which were creations of the Anglo-USA remains of the British empire at the end of WWII.)
    Retrospectively the world wars were the necessary end of agrarian land empires and the emergence of federations of industrial nation states. The generals were correct in their criticism claiming we ended World War II early. We assumed islam was defeated, and we failed to defeat the communists in China and the authoritarians in Russia. While islam will be readily defeated with little effort if exported from our lands, and while russia will shrink dramatically by depopulation. The chinese only slightly less so.
    The end of ’empires’ and the conversion to alliances of Nation States – likely by race and civilization, will continue only after the remaining empires are defeated. The USA assumes they will outlive the ability of these empires as we did the communists. But chinese fascism (not communism) has been so successful at massive industrialization and trade capture that the outcome of the ‘debate’ may still be in question.
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:49:43 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1907883229627166930

  • Trump is reorganizing world security and trade. He is doing it quickly and unple

    Trump is reorganizing world security and trade. He is doing it quickly and unpleasantly (to get it over with) using security and tariffs – because asking and negotiating didn’t work. To create the world order we have had three phases:

    1 – Bretton Woods Order: Subsidizing the world recovery, and limiting authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our industrial advantage)

    2 – Neoliberal Order: Subsidizing world finance and ending the authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our middle and working classes.)

    3 – Trump’s Restoration of Traditional Order: Ending the subsidies, redistributing the cost of world order, whether defense or transport and trade. (Cost: disruption of alliances, economy, and ‘deep state’ – all of which were creations of the Anglo-USA remains of the British empire at the end of WWII.)

    Retrospectively the world wars were the necessary end of agrarian land empires and the emergence of federations of industrial nation states. The generals were correct in their criticism claiming we ended World War II early. We assumed islam was defeated, and we failed to defeat the communists in China and the authoritarians in Russia. While islam will be readily defeated with little effort if exported from our lands, and while russia will shrink dramatically by depopulation. The chinese only slightly less so.

    The end of ’empires’ and the conversion to alliances of Nation States – likely by race and civilization, will continue only after the remaining empires are defeated. The USA assumes they will outlive the ability of these empires as we did the communists. But chinese fascism (not communism) has been so successful at massive industrialization and trade capture that the outcome of the ‘debate’ may still be in question.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1907882677702995968

  • EXPLAINING TRUMPIAN WORLD RESTRUCTURING Trump is reorganizing world security and

    EXPLAINING TRUMPIAN WORLD RESTRUCTURING
    Trump is reorganizing world security and trade. He is doing it quickly and unpleasantly (to get it over with) using security and tariffs – because asking and negotiating didn’t work.

    To create the world order we have had three phases:
    1 – Bretton Woods Order: Subsidizing the world recovery, and limiting authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our industrial advantage)
    2 – Neoliberal Order: Subsidizing world finance and ending the authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our middle and working classes.)
    3 – Trump’s Restoration of Traditional Order: Ending the subsidies, redistributing the cost of world order, whether defense or transport and trade. (Cost: disruption of alliances, economy, and ‘deep state’ – all of which were creations of the Anglo-USA remains of the British empire at the end of WWII.)

    Retrospectively the world wars were the necessary end of agrarian land empires and the emergence of federations of industrial nation states. The generals were correct and we ended World War II early. We assumed islam was defeated, and we failed to defeat the communists in China and the authoritarians in Russia. While islam will be readily defeated with little effort if exported from our lands, and while russia will shrink dramatically by depopulation. The chinese only slightly less so. The end of ’empires’ and the conversion to alliances of Nation States – likely by race and civilization, will continue only after the remaining empires are defeated.

    The USA assumes they will outlive the ability of these empires. But chinese fascism (not communism) has been so successful at massive industrialization and trade capture that the outcome of the ‘debate’ may still be in question.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @CharlieShrem


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:36:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907879976986447872

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907785903877087578

  • RT @elonmusk: The long con of the left is corruption of the judiciary

    RT @elonmusk: The long con of the left is corruption of the judiciary


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 06:06:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907676082553123092

  • RT @jwmares: Singapore created the world’s most efficient healthcare system from

    RT @jwmares: Singapore created the world’s most efficient healthcare system from scratch in one generation.

    They spend $4,000 per person o…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-01 22:54:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907204902633513275

  • Dunno. Putin tends to wait out expenditures (political will) in democratic count

    Dunno. Putin tends to wait out expenditures (political will) in democratic countries, just as the USA waits out authoritarian or ideological economies and the Chinese authoritarians wait out by delay and deceive.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-01 22:49:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907203791042334891

    Reply addressees: @AmericaFirstCon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907189129164829152

  • We shoot them down easily because they are subsonic prior to addressing the targ

    We shoot them down easily because they are subsonic prior to addressing the target. No Threat.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-01 21:48:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907188250411929737

    Reply addressees: @PopMech

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907183337602506867

  • Empty threat. Putin has no intention of negotiating a settlement

    Empty threat. Putin has no intention of negotiating a settlement.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-01 21:46:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907187964922544147

    Reply addressees: @AmericaFirstCon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907187432942149708