Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • RT @erikbrus25: @digitildream @_markenau @realdanstilwell @curtdoolittle English

    RT @erikbrus25: @digitildream @_markenau @realdanstilwell @curtdoolittle English had perfect governmentband they blew it! 😮‍💨:

    Perfect Emp…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 18:12:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670132320739684356

  • Q: “DO YOU EVER FIND IT WEIRD BEING A YANK AND A MONARCHIST?” I was surprised, y

    Q: “DO YOU EVER FIND IT WEIRD BEING A YANK AND A MONARCHIST?”

    I was surprised, yes. But I’ve come to undrestand it’s just the result of doing the science.

    I just follow the evidence. It was rather late in life that I understood that the english completed the restoration of greek reason and politics and roman legislation and administration in the british invention of the modern empirical (scientific) dutiful rule of law state.

    And that the USA as a british colony, had created a constitution that codified that invention, completing Aristotle’s project of a scientific (natural) government, but failed to include the presumptions inherent in that innovation: the rule of law by the natural law by commonality and concurrency as the science of cooperation, and the government as a hierarchy of courts to limit us to the science of cooperation by that law, commonality, and concurrency, and the reason being to prohibit authority by the maximization of individual responsibility, with participation in self determination by evidence of taking and demonstrating that responsibility.

    They had only an intuition of the existence of evolution but for all intents and purposes our ancient ancestors created the most evolutionary society and government with the least resistance to discoverty, innovation, application, adaptation, and evolution in human history, or that is humanly possible.

    As such the west evolved faster than the rest combined in the bronze, iron, and steel ages.

    However, we failed to learn that we cannot domesticate rule, or cooperate with peoples who are inferior in institutions and development becuse of their demographics and tradition.

    So there is a conflict between the ancestral desire to create empires to profit from trade, and the natural tendency of man to desire federations of states that all profit from trade but distribute the cost of government and war and in doing so resists empires -as we are having to resist three imperial civilizations today.

    They can only do so if they all adhere to natural law.

    The Natural Government consists of a hierarchy of Juries (courts):
    The Four Sets of the Laws of Nature (Logical, Physical, Behavioral, Evolutionary)
    … < The Natural Law of Cooperation
    … … < A Constitution Producing that Hierarchy of Courts under that natural law
    … … … < A Monarchy as judge of Last Resort , above the law in the restoration of the law.
    … … … … < A Cabinet for the Administation of the Commons
    … … … … … < A Parliament of houses or Regions and Class as a Political Court (Negativa) and Market between the Regions and Classes (Positiva)
    … … … … … … < The Courts for the Resolution of Substantive Harms
    … … … … … … … < A Nobility for the resolution of common conflicts
    … … … … … … … … < A Church for the restolution of moral disputes
    … … … … … … … … … < Every man as his own legislature for himself and his family in federation with all other men in the polity.
    … … … … … … … … … … < Every woman as the legislature for herself and her childen.

    This is a hierarchy of responsibility given domains of DEMONSTRATED (empirical) interest and comptency

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670126036057571329

  • Q: WHY DOES CONSERVATIVE INTUITION AND TRADITION IN ARGUMENT FAIL? The reason co

    Q: WHY DOES CONSERVATIVE INTUITION AND TRADITION IN ARGUMENT FAIL?
    The reason conservative arugments fail is the tendency of conservatives (intertemporal, responsibile, capitalizers, empiricists) to use reductive (simple) language, largely reduced to moral claim, with one single…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:02:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670069433610428416

  • Q: WHY DOES CONSERVATIVE INTUITION AND TRADITION IN ARGUMENT FAIL? The reason co

    Q: WHY DOES CONSERVATIVE INTUITION AND TRADITION IN ARGUMENT FAIL?
    The reason conservative arugments fail is the tendency of conservatives (intertemporal, responsibile, capitalizers, empiricists) to use reductive (simple) language, largely reduced to moral claim, with one single cause, rather than enumerating the full set of the left’s crimes, and explaining their origin in means of correction.

    The left is just the feminine instinct applied at scale to the detriminent of genetics, knnowledge, norms traditions values, society, economy, polity, grand strategy, and the civilization as a whole.

    Women evolved for unregulated hyperconsumption limted by the means of male supply of female demands. Using religion, government, ideology and the academy, this feminine strategy seeks to undermine the male instinct intuition and traditions and engage in herdlike hyperconsumption regardless of teh devastating costs of the end of meritocracy and natural selection both of individuals, groups, civilzations, and the knowledge they convey.

    Our organization teaches ‘aruguing from first principles(causes), using disambiguation by enumeration, serialization, and operationalization producing a universally commensurable value neutral language of not only ethics, economics, politics, grand strategy, and evolutoin itself, but all disciplines known and possible to know, by man.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:02:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670069433430048768

  • Nature, of which man is a member, judges everything – over some period of time.

    Nature, of which man is a member, judges everything – over some period of time. And it is not merciful.

    The USA cannot maintain democracy or rule of law or relative wealth with an IQ under 97, and certainly not under 95, because the minimum optimum IQ is 105 and the maximum is closer to 115. And there is a relationship between the needs of the economy and the possibility of a majority middle class. When it is the middle class and only the middle class that has moral ambitions (treating everyone as a customer).

    We are just about to tip into 97IQ and will hit 95 within two decades. That means the gains of western civ in the USA are lost, and an authoritarian government will be required and the middle class will continue to evaporate, and wealth will decline to second world levels.

    Reply addressees: @digitildream @realdanstilwell


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 13:27:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670060635491631104

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670058014747901954

  • Yes. And he took it to ridiculous extremes, and thats why america gave up on wha

    Yes. And he took it to ridiculous extremes, and thats why america gave up on what was a succesful progressive movement. 🙁 Prohibition and eugenics worked.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 04:19:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669922717733203968

    Reply addressees: @NeeNeeFaucher

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669914590690279426

  • Eugenics isn’t a choice; it’s a necessity. Deal with it

    Eugenics isn’t a choice; it’s a necessity. Deal with it

    Eugenics isn’t a choice; it’s a necessity.
    Deal with it. https://t.co/5iHFqCQJi7


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 01:11:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669875286488363016

  • You claim they’re doing nothing. But they are doing what they should and can. Yo

    You claim they’re doing nothing. But they are doing what they should and can. You’re asking them to save you rather than asking them for the moral license to save them and ourselves.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 21:26:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669456257059618819

    Reply addressees: @Richard_0292 @DustinofApollon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669451802326999042

  • RT @kajakallas: A very strong call from #Estonia’s Parliament to break Russia’s

    RT @kajakallas: A very strong call from #Estonia’s Parliament to break Russia’s cycle of aggression and establish a special international t…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 19:23:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669425456985128961

  • THE ERADICATION OF THE LEFT – FOR ALL TIME Our goal is the total eradication of

    THE ERADICATION OF THE LEFT – FOR ALL TIME

    Our goal is the total eradication of the left, or rather, the means by which the left lies and deceives, undermines, and engages in sedition and treason, by the institutional criminalization of their methods, and the use of the courts to treat all such sedition as high crime, with severe punishment.

    The only choice we have is whether we separate from them to eliminate the left – national divorce, and save ourselves from their harms. Or to legally constrain them from further harm, and collect restitution eliminating their crimes. Or ostracize and exit them bodily from responsible civilization in self-defense, and use the courts to prevent any repetition of introgression at any time present and future.

    Our ancestors have had to move to a new continent to leave behind the corruption of the European peasantry, Church, and Aristocracy so that the productive middle classes (“people of good character”) were free of the decadence, corruption, and rent-seeking of each of the parasitic classes.

    We have no new continents to conquer – and space is a long way in the future. We cannot let the left repeat their destruction of the ancient European world by the same false promises of the Christians, or the destruction of the seven other great civilizations of the ancient world by the Muslims made possible by the destruction of European civilization by the Christians.

    Victory isn’t hard. Our solutions are absolutely moral and only the evil in among us can reject them. It’s just a matter of repeating the method of the founders, by a common law suit against the state for a redress of grievances (Second Declaration) and a set of reforms to correct those grievances (Constitutional Amendments) that prevent them rising again – continuing the long tradition of incremental suppression of violations of our self-determination, by rent-seeking elites who like all humans excuse their criminality until we not longer excuse it ourselves.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 18:26:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669411097986646041