Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • You mean like you left-wing members of the marxist cult that are simply a pseudo

    You mean like you left-wing members of the marxist cult that are simply a pseudoscientific reformation of the Abrahamic superstitious cult? (yes). So why should we tolerate the ‘march through the institutions of cultural production’ in an intentional warfare on western…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-30 18:21:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674845687735779329

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674845077217083392

  • I “showed up”, and with hundreds of (armed) men. We showed how to make legal ref

    I “showed up”, and with hundreds of (armed) men. We showed how to make legal reform, how not to take the bait, how to work with the opposition, and how not to get canceled. And you petty, infantile, violent nitwits canceled us instead. So you’re the reason you fail. Because you’re bad people. And no one wants to help you. And everyone wants you to disappear. And economically, you’re disappearing. And reproductively, you’re disappearing. And politically, you’ve already disappeared. So that’s why you whine on social media demanding violence – when that’s never going to work because it’s exactly what the enemy wants you to do. Because they know you’re infantile suckers for the ploy. Because you always take the bait – just like they want you to.
    You’re disgusting, really. 😉

    Reply addressees: @HaknarIronfoot


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-30 18:14:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674843767004594189

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674842274868371456

  • You are correct, and he isn’t, because he associates an authoritarian state with

    You are correct, and he isn’t, because he associates an authoritarian state with fascism instead of the entire spectrum of Fascism, Socialism, and Communism. Because all three constrain markets for voluntary cooperation, suppress, alternative organization, information, and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 20:03:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674508853038182409

    Reply addressees: @Chris_Hafer101

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674508165592006656

  • (Food For Thought) –“One fundamental problem with a purely meritocratic system

    (Food For Thought)
    –“One fundamental problem with a purely meritocratic system in a multi-racial society is that some races will become effectively locked out of positions of power.”–

    Riffing off Jayman’s usual insight:

    In the Western tradition
    1) We prohibit authority, and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 17:10:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674465269719216132

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674440343427620866

  • (Food For Thought) –“One fundamental problem with a purely meritocratic system

    (Food For Thought)
    –“One fundamental problem with a purely meritocratic system in a multi-racial society is that some races will become effectively locked out of positions of power.”–

    Riffing off Jayman’s usual insight:

    In the Western tradition
    1) We prohibit authority, and grand only powers of decidability.
    (This forces us into markets)

    2) So we practice trifunctionalism. With Military(masculine), Religious(feminine), and Law(Neutral) elites where the common (empirical) law (tradition) is the referee.
    (This is a market)

    3) We practice concurrency(not democracy) in decision making. Meaning consensus among the Regions(nobility) and classes (houses).
    (This is a market)

    4) To do so we created houses (markets for concurrency between the classes). We had, and should still have, houses for the classes:
    … i) Monarchy (judge of last resort) for the territory,
    … ii) Nobility(senate) for the region,
    … iii) House of Commons (Property owners(really: businesses)), for the producers
    … iv) Lower House (Church) for women, dependents.
    (These houses constitute a market.)

    5) There is no evidence that multicultural and or multi racial societies can survive given the demographic differences in traits, and the resulting demographic differences in wants and needs for norms, traditions, values, and institutions.
    … a) this is because, with kin preference alone, and demographic differences more so, there will always either be extraction by the more competitive group to the less – directly or indirectly; or there will be redistribution (extraction) from the more competitive group by the less competitive group – and the value of political unity is never offset by extraction.
    … b) So, instead we have had federations of defense and trade because separate states may produce different internal institutions and economies but cooperate extra-politically.
    … c) But, It may be possible to create a house or modify a house to try to maintain concurrency between ethinic and racial groups through political rather than just economic trades.
    … d) but there is no evidence at all, that this experiment would be preferable in any way over returning to pre-civil-war federation of states, just in the European tradition, and in particular the tradition of the holy roman empire that had not just many small states but free cities with even greater flexibility given their international (sometimes hostile) interests vs the rest of the polity.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 17:10:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674465269421420564

  • Martin’s right. The term “Racist” is now just an accusation of heresy from the m

    Martin’s right. The term “Racist” is now just an accusation of heresy from the marxist-to-woke pseudoscientific religious cult.

    (Sigh.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-28 00:14:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673847271744589826

  • We could just stick to the observable rather than the philosophical and state th

    We could just stick to the observable rather than the philosophical and state the truth: lefitst are just either childishly immature and ignorant, intrinsically immoral, or constantly lying and denying. 😉

    Do women know almost everything they say is a lie?
    Do leftists?
    Don’t think so.

    Brains predict and value emotions in time (feminine leftist, demand), or predict systems and value outcomes over time (masculine rightist, supply).

    Reply addressees: @SClaus1984


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 18:58:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673767851834875906

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673766665006227456

  • Have to understand how you identify yourself as a leftist, whether it’s maximizi

    Have to understand how you identify yourself as a leftist, whether it’s maximizing possible redistribution or it’s lying about human nature and trying to force government to adhere to those lies. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 18:44:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673764245987532835

    Reply addressees: @damianoram

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673763383072399360

  • Why It’s Pointless To Debate Leftists –“I feel like it’s not worth it to debate

    Why It’s Pointless To Debate Leftists

    –“I feel like it’s not worth it to debate leftists given you should really have a conversation about their underlying philosophic tenets and the incentive structures they have, but a leftist would refuse to do that, since they would view it as irrelevant.”–RL

    Correct. Because it would force them into mindfulness, that would force them in to introspection, that would force them to adapt, which would force them to self-regulate, instead of just ‘feel and react’ – and as such they will resist that entire sequence to their last breath. 😉

    (Same advice I give men. Don’t argue with women. Seek to understand. Then say only you can or will, can’t or won’t do or participate in that. The problem is we can choose not to cooperate with women but the government by majority rule allows them to force us to do what they wish even though we don’t want to cooperate with them. Hence Secession and Separation is the only possibility.)

    There is a reason the Abrahamists invented mythicism and theology, why the Germans converted it to dialectic, and the Marxists applied dialectic, and why the postmodernists reinvented institutionalized lying (sophistry), because reason evidence reciprocity are obstacles to power to obtain corruption, rents, and free riding, without demonstrated competency in market productivity.

    No more lies, thanks. 😉
    Childhood ended with the right to participate in government.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 18:20:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673758237101793296

  • CONTRA DONALD COHEN ON THE PRIVATIZATION OF EVERYTHING: How to Solve the Problem

    CONTRA DONALD COHEN ON THE PRIVATIZATION OF EVERYTHING:
    How to Solve the Problem of State vs Private Competency.
    (Communism > Socialism > Democratic Socialism > Classical Liberalism > Empiricism (rule of natural law)
    RE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhI4FcXddSU

    You’re discussing the central…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 16:21:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673728334247723009