Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • About a third of the population are capable of voting

    About a third of the population are capable of voting.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 19:12:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694789776010805283

    Reply addressees: @joanlarma

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694785103623332055

  • Right, because the USA is a domestic imperial rather than federal government bec

    Right, because the USA is a domestic imperial rather than federal government because it can interfere with internal matters of social preference. And the French in particular but the western europeans in general, are trying to produce the same imperial rather than federal government.

    A federal government can have no ‘say’ in matters that do not produce inter state conflict.

    This crisis, brought on by the introduction of women and jewish postwar activists with a feminine temperament, is all reducible to the folly of the individual over the family. we can easily restore COMMON INTEREST by restoring the primacy of the family (in which we have a common interest) over the primacy of the individual (in which we have infinitely divergent interests).

    Reply addressees: @erikbrus25 @TheAutistocrat @jeffreyatucker


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 16:54:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694754981650288640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694751258567930013

  • How is america an empire if it’s entire project is to end empires and create fre

    How is america an empire if it’s entire project is to end empires and create free trade, nation states, rule of law, consumer capitalism, and human rights? How is it an empire if it’s costly to produce these nation states and losing internal well-being terribly by doing so?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 16:29:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694748765695930802

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @jeffreyatucker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694747954727289073

  • You’re defining the postwar order by the left’s social and political propaganda

    You’re defining the postwar order by the left’s social and political propaganda of being antifascist, but the postwar order and way it is practiced in geostrategically, militarily, and economically, is anti-imperial, as I’ve said. And for some reason you don’t make that distinction – though I suppose that without being involved in the strategic side you’d be forgiven for an exclusive understanding of the social and political side.

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @jeffreyatucker


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 16:18:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694745917922934784

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694743658275148034

  • I see the triangle, of left, classical liberal, right, and that the classical li

    I see the triangle, of left, classical liberal, right, and that the classical liberal won, but if you mean the classical liberal cannot defeat the left without the right then I’d agree with that positioning. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 16:01:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694741673291506145

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @jeffreyatucker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694740670798328275

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @TheAutistocrat @jeffreyatucker WHAT IS THE LEFT DOING, HOW,

    RT @curtdoolittle: @TheAutistocrat @jeffreyatucker WHAT IS THE LEFT DOING, HOW, AND WHY?
    (undermining distributed responsibility, in order…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 15:48:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694738431560044551

  • WHAT IS THE LEFT DOING, HOW, AND WHY? (undermining distributed responsibility, i

    WHAT IS THE LEFT DOING, HOW, AND WHY?
    (undermining distributed responsibility, in order to generate demand for centralized authority)

    The left is making the individual (somewhat like libertarians are) the object of government, policy, legislation and law, instead of the family – for the simple reason that (a) under agrarianism the dissolution of the primacy of the family was unimaginable because the family was the insurer of last resort of the individual (b) the state has tried to replace the family as the insurer of last resort of the individual (c) the state has set the indiviual as the primary subject of policy (d) because our constitution and our law did not (correctly) establish the intergenerational family as the first necessary system of production upon which social, econmic, political, and strategy ‘production’ depends.

    So it’s quite easy to fix the policy that has given the left the tools to undermine the family, the purpose of all social, political, and strategic order the intergenerational family, and the economy the means by which to supply the satisfaction of the demands of that hierarchy of orders.

    We evolve and we learn. We have learned that the anglo enlightenment was correct, and the rench, german, jewish, and every other enlightenment has been not only incorrect, but a revolt against the anglo empirical enlightenment. We have learned that while it was beneficial to organize the inclusion of the middle class, that we were wrong to dilute the nobility and replace it with credentialed clerisy. We have learned that inclusion of the working class required a separate house not dilution of the middle class house. We have learnd that the inclusion of women was far worse than the inclusion of the working class without a separate house – becasue the houses constitute juries of demonstrated capacity for responsibility for others. And women avoid responsibility for others (at their cost) at all times, and instead, seek to produce irresponsibility for themsevles and others at all times.

    As such these questions are all relatively simple to fix – but only after having produced the evidence of the failure of each of teh additional classes, and then restoring the government as a market between the classes for the satisfaction of their wants – adminstered by people who have demonstraed capacity in the satisfaction of human wants, and not one that consists of a managerial government and a clerisy of credentialists with no demonstrated competency for the solution of real world problems with real world people, given the available incentives to do so without coercion – which is the only tool the govt has.

    You (martin) are obsessed with the woke movement, the irresponsible feminism that results, and see everything through that lens. When our job is to produce a solution for not only that movement but all future such deceptions and frauds, by discovering and curing causality not chasing ‘effects’ like they are feral cats.
    😉

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @jeffreyatucker


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 15:48:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694738422630359040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694721713790210501

  • RT @feeonline: “Government is about coercion. Limiting government is the single

    RT @feeonline: “Government is about coercion.

    Limiting government is the single most important instrument for guaranteeing liberty.”

    – W…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 14:32:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694719436769710096

  • CORRECT ANSWER That’s the consistent Right Wing folly of “money’d be better spen

    CORRECT ANSWER
    That’s the consistent Right Wing folly of “money’d be better spent on what I want without this war” as consistent as the Left Wing Folly “Money’d be better spent on what I want without NASA”. When in fact the money would be spent on yet something else you don’t want because there is no correlation between spending and public want.

    What causes this left vs right behavior? Feminine Oppression theory vs Masculine Conspiracy theory. These are sex cognitive differences in expression of the feeling of ‘lack of control’ or ‘the world is out of control’, amplified by trait neuroticism. When both demographic groups are experiencing the same sense of ‘lack of control’.

    Reality: We are largely ‘spending’ stockpiles that would otherwise have to pay to decommission. We are trying to prevent future wars. And we are doing it by exhausting RU using a party that’s seeking freedom and self determination. And we are continuing the postwar strategy to end empires that produced the world wars and replace them with federations of nation states and free trade, thus raising humanity out of poverty, and again, reducing the potential and cost of world wars in the age of nuclear weapons.

    In other words we are paying a high cost of Pax Americana, and aside from ‘stopping too early’ in china, russia, and waiting out islam, it’s working.

    Reply addressees: @jeffreyatucker


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 14:25:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694717677078773762

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694704447882981855

  • It’s part of his persona: (a) he never ever forgives betrayal, and kills for it.

    It’s part of his persona:
    (a) he never ever forgives betrayal, and kills for it.
    (b) he uses accidents that everyone knows are not accidents to create both uncertainty, the perception that his people are everywhere, and fear that you never know if you’re safe.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-23 22:14:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694473130184429923

    Reply addressees: @state_secession

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694463486519119946