Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

Classical liberalism emerged as t he agency of men increased, and especially the agency of men after the Industrial Revolution. Because male agency increased and male criminality increased, and because male criminality (antisocial behavior) is easily visible (and dangerous) our laws (largely) kept up with the incremental suppression of male antisocial behavior.

Unfortunately, the female, feminine, abrahamic, Marxist method of warfare by undermining, reputation destruction, of individuals and institutions, and the susceptibility to social construction of false promises that bait individuals and groups into hazards (devolution are consequences), was only enabled by the false promise of the end of scarcity and the europhoria it created ini the progressives and marxists (leftists) where they cast their previous poverty as oppression rather than scarcity domestication and necessity given their pervasive criminality. And as this feminine means of warfare was suppressed on the individual level with laws against shrilling etc (being Karen) under the common law, it was not suppressed in institutions because it is the means by which the Christian religion was spread and defeated the natural religion of european peoples.

So we are in a period of time where we are experiencing for the first time since the late Roman Empire, or the fall of Sparta, the results of introversion of feminine interests, and feminine men’s of antisocial behavior into the commons, economy, and polity. But we have not yet restored and expanded the law to suppress feminine antisocial behavior (seduction into false promises, undermining canceling, etc) because we haven’t had to since the Greco-Roman age, because the church like the marxist-postmodernist-woke hid behind the plausibility deniability that they have moral rather than parasitic intentions.

I worked very hard on legal constitutional and policy reform to counter this, and have done the work to do so. But only after making a special dispensation for the tolerance of Christian superstition.

And yes this is the correct answer.

Reply addressees: @Meritocrating