Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • THE FAR RIGHT? Technically speaking while a libertarian, like Hoppe, I’m also a

    THE FAR RIGHT?

    Technically speaking while a libertarian, like Hoppe, I’m also a member of the ‘far right’. I have no problem with the ‘Far Right’ and it’s emphasis on excellence, tradition, family, exclusion, ostracization, nationalism, and all that good tribal stuff that we lost and are dearly paying for. I understand that the working-class far-right wants elites to fight for their privileges – even if that privilege is only status signals. And the working-class, and increasingly the middle class, feels that their elites have sold them out. Because they have been sold out. And they are losing their privilege, earned for them by their elites in generations past, and now abandoned and consumed by them in generations present.

    But that doesn’t override my moral preference for either liberty for myself, and my people, or my moral preference for self determination. If some other people do not want a far right world, and if they can have it without parasitism upon those of us who seek liberty, status, or tradition, then I”m in support of it.

    I’m all in favor of many small countries with many differences. And let the market sort it out. And if you’re not, then by definition you’re an immoral person. A predator and parasite.

    Heterogeneity is a luxury good. Under threat, people return to tribal roots. Ad we are now under a permanent, unalterable, threat that we have not seen in over a thousand years.

    Russia is working with this knowledge. But I cannot tolerate being under ‘the only white people who failed’. Their pervasive nihilism and corruption. Their persistent failures. Their low trust society.

    So if Russia will not restore both tribalism and liberty, then its up to *US* to restore tribalism and liberty. Because liberty is only possible within a MORALLY homogenous polity.

    —

    BTW: Do you know what’s going to happen? Ghettos. The scale of which we have not seen before. Why? Because it’s been done before. It works. And we are going to flood the intellectual market with papers on how to do it.

    Yeah. I’m talking to you. You who want something to do? To contribute? We need papers on how we have constructed ghettos in the past, and how to construct ghettos today.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-05 09:26:00 UTC

  • PROPAGANDA Just as a matter of art, the Russian use of the internet, RTV, paid n

    PROPAGANDA

    Just as a matter of art, the Russian use of the internet, RTV, paid newsgroup and chat room propagandists, denial of service attacks, edited and manipulated video and photographs, paying local insurgents to cause chaos and destruction, bribing poorly paid police to stay home, while issuing perfect-pitch propaganda from bench, has got to be the most innovative form of warfare that I have seen in my lifetime.

    I mean, the whole international islamist militia is pretty good. But they have nothing on Russia.

    The only alternative to this kind of warfare is the anglo-swiss military model, which trains every single man, gives him a rifle, and makes him stay and capable through his 40’s.

    I mean. As someone who appreciates good propaganda and ideology, marketing and strategy, I have to say that its pretty impressive, low cost way of conducting war.

    Everyone who hasn’t read Keegan’s History of Warfare should: war is conducted and won by the criteria set by the culture. The west uses truth and immediate conflict for immediate resolution. China uses precisely the opposite: deception and delay. Russia has chosen the middle ground of deception and steady progress.

    When we come for Washington DC it will be on such terms.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-05 06:42:00 UTC

  • DEMOTISM – TYRANNY IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE —“Demotism — Rule in the name of

    DEMOTISM – TYRANNY IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE

    —“Demotism — Rule in the name of the People. The term has been recently popularized by Mencius Moldbug. Democracy and Communism are seen as two types of Demotism. Reactionaries view Demotism as a form of mob rule, where politicians pander to what they see as the popular will, rather than making their own decisions as independent leaders. A quote of unknown attribution, which first appears in print in 1951, sums up the Reactionary view on Demotism: “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy.” Reactionaries see the Reign of Terror and Stalin’s Purges as classic consequences of Demotism. Though monarchies have historically persecuted religious and ethnic minorities within their borders, none have shed blood on the scale of the French or Russian Revolutions and their subsequent purges. Quoting Erik von Keuhnelt-Leddihn: “The renaissance of democracy marked the beginning of the Age of the “G”—guillotines, genocide, gaols, gallows, gas chambers and Gulags.”— by Michael Anissimov

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-05 04:26:00 UTC

  • LEFTISM —“Leftism — An ideology that seeks to tear down meritocracy, exception

    LEFTISM

    —“Leftism — An ideology that seeks to tear down meritocracy, exceptionalism and traditional structures so that the lowest common denominator can satiate their feelings of envy and status seeking via pathological altruism using other people’s wealth. (Leftism is an attempt to obtain status without contribution.) A capitalist, leftist society primarily legitimizes accomplishment in only a couple domains — money and hedonism — at the expense of all higher values, including long-term social stability.”—

    —“Instead of encouraging individual accomplishment, Leftism is driven by a “leveling dynamic” summarized by the pithy slogan “everyone gets a trophy”. Social “progress” is defined in terms of maximizing short-term individual hedonism at the expense of general social health. Promoting an “anything goes” values, the end result is a cloud of largely indistinguishable, atomized individuals, rather than anything resembling social coherence or strength. “Culture” is seen as a fluid construct, to be thrown out casually and replaced with a new alternative at the slightest whim. Moral and cultural relativism reigns. No system can be seen as better than any other, lest the proponents of the inferior system take offense.”— by Michael Anissimov

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-05 04:19:00 UTC

  • HAS HIS WAR

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-crisis-this-is-not-some-kind-of-a-shortlived-uprising-it-is-a-war-9321410.htmlPUTIN HAS HIS WAR

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-04 12:28:00 UTC

  • *THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT IS A CRITICISM. PROPERTARIANISM IS AN EXPLANATION. ARIST

    *THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT IS A CRITICISM.

    PROPERTARIANISM IS AN EXPLANATION.

    ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM IS A SOLUTION.*

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-04 04:46:00 UTC

  • THE CORPOREAL DEMOCRATIC STATE IS THE INSURER OF THE IMMORAL MAN

    THE CORPOREAL DEMOCRATIC STATE IS THE INSURER OF THE IMMORAL MAN

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-04 03:46:00 UTC

  • ARISTOCRACY AS THE INSURER OF LIBERTY All aristocracy must by definition treat e

    ARISTOCRACY AS THE INSURER OF LIBERTY

    All aristocracy must by definition treat each other as equals, regardless of our race, religion, culture, language. But that is because the contract of aristocratic egalitarianism requires we reciprocally grant one another all property rights, and agree to defend each other against abrogations of those rights, without question, regardless of sacrifice. We INSURE each other. Aristocracy is the insurer of liberty. Aristocracy crates liberty. Aristocracy Insures liberty. And the currency of aristocracy is violence.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-04 03:44:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY BEGINS WITH VIOLENCE, MORALITY IS MADE BY VIOLENCE —“Right is not

    SOVEREIGNTY BEGINS WITH VIOLENCE, MORALITY IS MADE BY VIOLENCE

    —“Right is not the offspring of doctrine, but of power. All laws, commandments, or doctrines as to not doing to another what you do not wish done to you, have no inherent authority whatever, but receive it only from the club, the gallows, and the sword. A man truly free is under no obligation to obey any injunction, human or divine. Obedience is the sign of the degenerate. Disobedience is the stamp of the hero.”—

    If we apply our wealth of violence to the suppression of free riding in all its forms, then we create the most productive and meritocratic moral code for any body of people that is possible.

    But that result is an aristocratic moral code – a meritocratic moral code. Merit is to the disadvantage of the incompetent and degenerate. Christianity is merely a rebellion against aristocracy.

    But unable to suppress aristocracy, and aristocracy uninterested in suppressing christianity, the west was a product of the dialectic between the christians and the actions, habits and traditions of the aristocracy.

    Might makes whatever right it’s wielder chooses to. But there is only one optimum moral principle available to man, to which we all adhere to different degrees: upon choosing not to use violence, and instead to cooperate, we create the problem of free riding. To suppress free riding we create moral rules. To enforce moral rules we create authority. By creating moral rules we create free riding by corruption. To enforce moral rules against free riding by corruption we must suppress the state. To suppress the state requires that we use violence to suppress free riding in all its forms: criminal, unethical, immoral, conspiratorial, and statist.

    Might makes whatever right we choose. One can choose an objectively moral right: the suppression or free riding. Or one can choose one of the many others – all of which institute some form of free riding.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-04 03:17:00 UTC

  • PHASES OF WARFARE 1 non-military asymmetric warfare (info, psycho, ideological,

    http://romaninukraine.com/new-paper-on-russian-military-thinking/8 PHASES OF WARFARE

    1 non-military asymmetric warfare (info, psycho, ideological, diplo, economic)

    2 special operations to mislead pol & mil leadership via diplomatic, media, channels, leaks, false data & orders

    3 intimidation, deceiving, and bribing govt and military officers, to make them abandon duties etc

    4 destabilizing propaganda to increase public discontent, boosted by the arrival of Russian bands of militants, escalating subversion.

    5 establishment of no-fly zones & blockades, extensive use of private military in close cooperation with armed opposition units.

    6 military action, preceded by special ops, cyber, sabotage, espionage, subversion

    7 info ops, electronic warfare, air harrassment, high precision weapons, EMP,

    8 mopping up, with artillery, airdrops etc

    10 PRINCIPLES

    1 direct influence matters more than direct destruction

    2 instead of direct annihilation of opponent, promote his inner decay

    3 war using culture matters more than weapons & technology

    4 special forces & commercial irregular forces instead of conventional military

    5 from the traditional (3D) battleground to information/psychological warfare and war of perceptions;

    6 from direct clash to contactless war;

    7 from a superficial and compartmentalised war to a total war, including the enemy’s internal side and base;

    8 from war in the physical environment to war in human consciousness and cyberspace

    9 from symmetric to assymetric warfare, combining political, economic, info, techno & ecological campaigns

    10 From war in a defined period of time to a state of permanent war as the natural condition in national life.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-02 18:37:00 UTC