Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • The first purpose of kings, is to provide a means for the resolution of differen

    —The first purpose of kings,

    is to provide a means for

    the resolution of differences.—


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-19 10:29:00 UTC

  • (Hillary is trying to be likable rather than competent. Bad campaign advice. She

    (Hillary is trying to be likable rather than competent. Bad campaign advice. She isn’t likeable. She’s unpleasant, with a dishonesty she learned from Alinsky like Obama. She’s not even a very good person. Her reputation was closer to the Iron Lady’s: one of decisive seriousness, than to likability. And while one can fake competence one cannot really fake likability. Personally I think she’d be even worse than Obama has been. But at least we’d have her husband as a proxy in the white house. I can’t really see her surviving much longer. But Bill is pretty smart. We’ll see.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-19 10:22:00 UTC

  • Worst. President. In. History

    Worst. President. In. History.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-16 10:01:00 UTC

  • They are breeding, invading and fighting. You’re sitting on your ass and talking

    They are breeding, invading and fighting.

    You’re sitting on your ass and talking.

    The problem is you.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-15 04:46:00 UTC

  • Dark Enlightenment, Propertarianism, Aristocratic Egalitarianism

    [T]HE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT IS A CRITICISM. [P]ROPERTARIANISM IS AN EXPLANATION. [A]RISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM IS A SOLUTION.*

  • Dark Enlightenment, Propertarianism, Aristocratic Egalitarianism

    [T]HE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT IS A CRITICISM. [P]ROPERTARIANISM IS AN EXPLANATION. [A]RISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM IS A SOLUTION.*

  • Sovereignty Begins with Violence, Morality is Made by Violence

    —“Right is not the offspring of doctrine, but of power. All laws, commandments, or doctrines as to not doing to another what you do not wish done to you, have no inherent authority whatever, but receive it only from the club, the gallows, and the sword. A man truly free is under no obligation to obey any injunction, human or divine. Obedience is the sign of the degenerate. Disobedience is the stamp of the hero.”—

    [I]f we apply our wealth of violence to the suppression of free riding in all its forms, then we create the most productive and meritocratic moral code for any body of people that is possible. But that result is an aristocratic moral code – a meritocratic moral code. Merit is to the disadvantage of the incompetent and degenerate. Christianity is merely a rebellion against aristocracy. But unable to suppress aristocracy, and aristocracy uninterested in suppressing christianity, the west was a product of the dialectic between the christians and the actions, habits and traditions of the aristocracy. Might makes whatever right it’s wielder chooses to. But there is only one optimum moral principle available to man, to which we all adhere to different degrees: upon choosing not to use violence, and instead to cooperate, we create the problem of free riding. To suppress free riding we create moral rules. To enforce moral rules we create authority. By creating moral rules we create free riding by corruption. To enforce moral rules against free riding by corruption we must suppress the state. To suppress the state requires that we use violence to suppress free riding in all its forms: criminal, unethical, immoral, conspiratorial, and statist. Might makes whatever right we choose. One can choose an objectively moral right: the suppression or free riding. Or one can choose one of the many others – all of which institute some form of free riding.

  • Sovereignty Begins with Violence, Morality is Made by Violence

    —“Right is not the offspring of doctrine, but of power. All laws, commandments, or doctrines as to not doing to another what you do not wish done to you, have no inherent authority whatever, but receive it only from the club, the gallows, and the sword. A man truly free is under no obligation to obey any injunction, human or divine. Obedience is the sign of the degenerate. Disobedience is the stamp of the hero.”—

    [I]f we apply our wealth of violence to the suppression of free riding in all its forms, then we create the most productive and meritocratic moral code for any body of people that is possible. But that result is an aristocratic moral code – a meritocratic moral code. Merit is to the disadvantage of the incompetent and degenerate. Christianity is merely a rebellion against aristocracy. But unable to suppress aristocracy, and aristocracy uninterested in suppressing christianity, the west was a product of the dialectic between the christians and the actions, habits and traditions of the aristocracy. Might makes whatever right it’s wielder chooses to. But there is only one optimum moral principle available to man, to which we all adhere to different degrees: upon choosing not to use violence, and instead to cooperate, we create the problem of free riding. To suppress free riding we create moral rules. To enforce moral rules we create authority. By creating moral rules we create free riding by corruption. To enforce moral rules against free riding by corruption we must suppress the state. To suppress the state requires that we use violence to suppress free riding in all its forms: criminal, unethical, immoral, conspiratorial, and statist. Might makes whatever right we choose. One can choose an objectively moral right: the suppression or free riding. Or one can choose one of the many others – all of which institute some form of free riding.

  • DEMOCRACY —“our representative democratic institutions have been captured by m

    http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2013/02/political-failure-modes-and-th.htmlBROKEN DEMOCRACY

    —“our representative democratic institutions have been captured by meta-institutions that implement the iron law of oligarchy by systematically reducing the risk of change. They have done so by converging on a common set of policies that do not serve the public interest, but minimize the risk of the parties losing the corporate funding they require in order to achieve re-election. And in so doing, they have broken the “peaceful succession when enough people get pissed off” mechanism that prevents revolutions. “—

    I guess other people are reading Burnham and Michels…. 🙂

    The swiss model.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-13 07:05:00 UTC

  • Aristocratice Egalitarianism vs The Central Libertarian Fallacies

    (worth repeating) –Aristocratic Egalitarianism is a replacement for the fallacy of immaculate conception we call natural law. And High trust society is a replacement for the fallacy of aggression as sufficient for the formation of a voluntary polity in the absence of a state. Propertarianism is the explanation why.—