Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Aristocracy and Tribalism, vs Democracy and Racism

    [D]amn it. I do not think of people’s race except in descriptive terms, the same way I point out the color of a shirt, car or house when describing it. There are great men. If I have to think of the person’s race to determine if they are great men, then they aren’t. Either a man carries his water or he doesn’t. His race doesn’t matter. If he makes it matter, then unfortunately I have to make it matter too. One of the reasons that I find Aristocracy so appealing, is that it’s appealing to EVERY TRIBE out there. It’s GOOD FOR ALL tribes. It doesn’t matter if this tribe or that tribe has better or worse individuals. What matters is that aristocracy can construct the educational and commercial order necessary for that tribe to participate in the global economy. The only reason race is a problem, is the denial of it, and the fantasy that all our tribes are equal. They aren’t any more equal than families are equal or classes are equal. We’re just not equal in our traits. But we are equal in the market where we are anonymous and invisible to one another, and equal in our interests in helping one another. [A]ristocracy around the world is the same. It’s the bottom 3/4 of any tribe that is materially different, and its in their interests and possibly in mankind’s interest to be genetically different. The only reason to desire large numbers is to conquer people or colonize people according to your favorite biases. I can’t for the life of me understand how the world would not be better constructed of 5M person city states rather than 1 billion person empire-states, except that big states can conduct bigger wars. If the head of tribe/state X race Y talks to the head of tribe/state A race B get together it probably will work out just fine if they want to conduct a trade. But the minute tribe C tries to increase its dominion nothing good comes out of it except war.

  • CENTRAL ARGUMENTS : DEFEATING THREE RED QUEENS (worth repeating) Most of my argu

    CENTRAL ARGUMENTS : DEFEATING THREE RED QUEENS

    (worth repeating)

    Most of my arguments consist of various permutations that point out the fallacies of the libertarian, classical liberal, and progressive canons that do not account for the three genetic problems of (a) outbreeding and extension of kinship trust, (b) minimum pareto distribution of verbal intelligence, and (c) reduced genetic testosterone and therefore impulsivity, in the construction of a polity capable of the voluntary organization of production, and a sufficient velocity of exchange, such that we produce the constant innovation necessary to stay ahead of both the (i) genetic red queen, the (ii) malthusian red queen, and (iii) the technological red queen – and how those three red queens must be defeated in order to preserve economic prosperity that allows us to have whatever nonsensical social order we choose.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-04 13:32:00 UTC

  • THE THREE TYPES OF LIBERTARIAN LEFTISTS

    THE THREE TYPES OF LIBERTARIAN LEFTISTS

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-03 04:22:00 UTC

  • OUT WE”RE RIGHT : OBAMA IS THE WORSE PRESIDENT Nice data from Quinnipiac College

    http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2056TURNS OUT WE”RE RIGHT : OBAMA IS THE WORSE PRESIDENT

    Nice data from Quinnipiac College on just how bad a president obama is!

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-03 03:03:00 UTC

  • ZB MIRRORS MY POSITION, ON UKRAINE But I extend it to a general rule: a well tra

    ZB MIRRORS MY POSITION, ON UKRAINE

    But I extend it to a general rule: a well trained militia with RPGs and man portable anti armor missiles can neither be conquered, nor can conquer others. If you possess nuclear weapons and a well armed and trained militia consisting of every able bodied soul then you are a threat to your own government alone, not to any other; and you are unconquerable by both your government and others.

    One is free only if he not require permission.

    —“I feel that we should make it clear to the Ukrainians that if they are determined to resist, as they say they are and seemingly they are trying to do so (albeit not very effectively), we will provide them with anti-tank weapons, hand-held anti-tank weapons, hand-held rockets—weapons capable for use in urban short range fighting. This is not an arming of Ukraine for some invasion of Russia. You don’t invade a country as large as Russia with defensive weaponry. But if you have defensive weaponry and you have access to it and know it’s arriving, you’re more likely to resist.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-30 08:25:00 UTC

  • REVOLUTION COMES

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/06/27/1309994/–The-pitchforks-ARE-coming-A-billionaire-warns-his-fellow-Oligarchs-what-is-coming-down-the-pipe?detail=emailTHE REVOLUTION COMES

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-30 06:10:00 UTC

  • AN EXAMPLE Of PRIVATIZATION OF THE MILITARY

    https://twitter.com/steve_sailer/status/483497920092581888BLACKWATER: AN EXAMPLE Of PRIVATIZATION OF THE MILITARY

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/great-moments-in-privatization-blackwater/

    https://twitter.com/steve_sailer/status/483497920092581888

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-30 05:49:00 UTC

  • can india do to protect the rights of indians working overseas- particularly in

    http://www.quora.com/What-can-the-Indian-government-do-to-protect-the-rights-of-Indian-laborers-in-foreign-countries-especially-in-the-Middle-East-Why-has-it-not-taken-any-action-till-now/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=1″What can india do to protect the rights of indians working overseas- particularly in Saudi Arabia.”

    Nothing other than trade sanctions, which would only cause those countries to deport the workers.

    One has no “rights” external to the territory we stand in. That is a phrase of modern mysticism. The USA postwar effort to encourage all states to care for their citizens in order to be treated as legitimate is or was a function of US military and Ideological dominance.

    As the postwar consensus fails, and american hegemony declines, and the american mandate for fixed borders and human rights declines, and america can no longer project sufficient power to mandate fixed borders and human tights, neither fixed borders nor human rights will remain.

    We have seen Russia conquer Ukraine. Mexico invade the USA through mass immigration. Israel extend its borders. China invade russia through mass immigration. China conquer the nearby sea and threaten Japan. And ISIS and Iran try to reestablish the caliphate.

    Meanwhile the euro project is failing. Civil wars and and secessionist movements are spreading.

    So if you cant keep your own country’s economic house in order (and india cant because of corruption – india is too big), and the USA cannot play world policeman, then you will be subject to whatever arbitrary rules exist wherever you are standing.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-29 04:32:00 UTC

  • What Can The Indian Government Do To Protect The Rights Of Indian Laborers In Foreign Countries Especially In The Middle East? Why Has It Not Taken Any Action Till Now?

    Nothing other than trade sanctions, which would only cause those countries to deport the workers. 

    One has no “rights” external to the territory we stand in.  That is a phrase of modern mysticism.  The USA postwar effort to encourage all states to care for their citizens in order to be treated as legitimate is or was a function of US military and Ideological dominance.

    As the postwar consensus fails, and american hegemony declines, and the american mandate for fixed borders and human rights declines, and america can no longer project sufficient power to mandate fixed borders and human tights, neither fixed borders nor human rights will remain. 

    We have seen Russia conquer Ukraine.  Mexico invade the USA through mass immigration. Israel extend its borders. China invade russia through mass immigration.  China conquer the nearby sea and threaten Japan. And ISIS and Iran try to reestablish the caliphate.

    Meanwhile the euro project is failing. Civil wars and and secessionist  movements are spreading.

    So if you cant keep your own country’s economic house in order (and india cant because of corruption – india is too big), and the USA cannot play world policeman, then you will be subject to whatever arbitrary rules exist wherever you are standing.

    https://www.quora.com/What-can-the-Indian-government-do-to-protect-the-rights-of-Indian-laborers-in-foreign-countries-especially-in-the-Middle-East-Why-has-it-not-taken-any-action-till-now

  • Demand For Authority : Suppressing Retribution For Anti-Social, Unethical, and Immoral Actions

    THE PURPOSE OF AN AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT IS TO SUPPRESS RETRIBUTION FOR ANTI-SOCIAL, UNETHICAL AND IMMORAL ACTIONS. (and it’s genocidal) [T]he purpose of an investigatory police, is to concentrate knowledge of troublesome individuals and groups into the hands of specialists. So that crime can be investigated and reduced if not eliminated, by the suppression of, control of, and elimination of troublesome individuals and groups. We require, an investigatory police force, in the case of anonymous crimes, we cannot all of us possess such intimate knowledge of the minority who engage in career criminality. The more immoral the society, the more unethical the society, the more anti-social a society, the more need for various kinds of police to suppress retaliation against those who we KNOW, who are NOT anonymous, and who have committed anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. When we cannot use the courts to sue for restitution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions, the state must suppress our retribution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. The state currently punishes retribution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions – whereas in history, the job of all men, was to punish violations of anti-social, unethical, and immoral norms. [S]o instead, the state has LICENSED AND ADVOCATED anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions, by forbidding and punishing retribution for, and suppression of, anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. The state is the manufacturer of anti-social, unethical and immoral action. Why? In America, it is the conquest of conservative protestantism (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Britain it is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Europe is is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Canada it is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples (the french, and now the immigrants). In Russia they are trying to prohibit the conquest of their low trust people, by even lower trust peoples. REVERSE COLONIZATION We are being colonized so that statists can free ride, and the lower classes can live off the productivity of the middle classes and prevent the middle classes from breeding in sufficient numbers to retain their economic competitiveness and their high trust norms. If colonialism was immoral then surely reverse colonialism is immoral. It is certainly genocide.