Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Aristocratic Egalitarianism (Aristocratic Libertarianism). On advice from suppor

    Aristocratic Egalitarianism (Aristocratic Libertarianism). On advice from supporters, taking it to Twitter. #libertarian #liberty

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-04 06:26:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/496180423823589376

  • WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF A NATIONALIST RUSSIA – NATIONALISM IS A GOOD THING WE NEED

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/how-nationalism-came-to-dominate-russia-s-political-mainstream/504495.htmlNO WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF A NATIONALIST RUSSIA – NATIONALISM IS A GOOD THING WE NEED MORE OF

    We westerners are not terrified of a Nationalistic Russia. The Western right LOVES a nationalist Russia. We WANT a strong Russia. What the west doesn’t want, and the world doesn’t want, is a breakdown of the postwar consensus on fixed borders. And none of the eastern europeans want to be subjected to more Russian deceit, corruption, violence and murder. Russia is a corrupt country, with a corrupt government, and russians demonstrate low trust, and low regard for the commons. Europeans, even western europeans, desire a high trust western society, with high regard for the commons. Russians depend on resource wealth to compenate for their low trust and corrupt society. Eastern europeans cannot depend upon resource wealth – they must generate economies that participate with the rest of the world.

    All this moralizing and propaganda from Russia is just populist nonsense. We assumed Russia would mature into a modern democracy by slowly building an economy that integrated with the rest of the world.

    A nationalist Russia that is militarily strong is good for the west since it keeps Russia’s eastern conflict zone, and southern spheres of influence, with their 90 IQ societies, from being a problem for the rest of the world. The west needs a strong Russia. What the west doesn’t need is for Russia to spread the corruption, dishonesty, and low-trust of Russian society to countries that must participate in the world economy to obtain a western standard of living.

    It’s not complicated.

    ——

    LETTER TO RUSSIA FROM KIEV

    Dear Russia,

    We love you ok. You’re white. So we actually consider you part of the tribe. And yes, we westerners are kind of destroying Western civilization with abandon. And you’re right to reject that. And while we really don’t want to be in conflict with you, we do ask you to please keep your dysfunctional family, and dysfunctional political problems in your own house. We have problems but your problems are worse. Corruption, deception, pseudoscience, alcoholism, violence and mass murder are things russians are really good at. And we really don’t need you to export them to us. I mean, you killed enough of us already, haven’t you?

    And you kind of screwed up right? You could have let the USA continue withdrawing from Europe, softly guaranteed Europe’s safety militarily, and protect shipping on the high seas, and continued to spend the next 20 years integrating Russian resource dependence into the western economies. You could have imported western technology and law, behavior, and exported ‘resources, manliness, nationalism, and unity’ to the west. You could have accomplished the unification of the circumpolar peoples.

    But you screwed up. Yet again.

    Why is it that Russians, at every opportunity, make the wrong decision? It’s just amazing. It’s exasperating. Every time you can play the long run you screw it up.

    Please get your act together, and lead.

    Russia: why are you constantly the white people who fail?

    Thanks.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-04 02:12:00 UTC

  • GETING CLOSER : UNIVERSALISM AND HIGH TRUST Integration into a high trust polity

    GETING CLOSER : UNIVERSALISM AND HIGH TRUST

    Integration into a high trust polity, without damage (without parasitism or conquest), requires high trust, which in turn requires, truth telling, the nuclear family with prohibition on cousin marriage, legal enforcement of not only criminal but both ethical and moral prohibitions, codified as property rights, universal standing and loser-pays, use of the common language, eliminating of separatist dress, and celebration of the same holidays, and contributory production.

    Cultural heterogeneity in the sense, that we aggregate into neighborhoods and rely on different rituals and signals within our tribes, is only possible if we adopt all theses high trust constraints.

    The problem is that while we do that and people from every society can volunteer to do that, many people prefer to host in a high trust society as parasites. And for many groups, it is a necessary reproductive advantage. And advantage without which they would be absorbed into the polity at the loss of their identity.

    So in this sense, you can retain your signaling identity but not your reproductive and competitive strategies.

    I think that is enough to separate those who wish to integrate from those who wish to conduct parasitism.

    WE GET AROUND OUR CURSE OF ALTRUISM WITH TRUTH, CALCULABILITY, AND UNIVERSAL ENFORCEMENT BY UNIVERSAL STANDING.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-03 03:12:00 UTC

  • ***Let a thousand kingdoms bloom***

    ***Let a thousand kingdoms bloom***

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-02 05:37:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS CURT DOING? DRIVING TOWARD FASCISM? (NO) Just a note to tame the people

    WHAT IS CURT DOING? DRIVING TOWARD FASCISM? (NO)

    Just a note to tame the people I might make nervous: Don’t get ahead of me. I have already solved the institutional problem of a heterogeneous system of cooperation over homogenous normative polities – the way we demonstrate that want to live. Shared cooperation but tribal homes. Insurance at scale. I solved that first. The problem has always been in explaining why it’s necessary, and why its the ONLY institutional solution to heterogeneous polity: calculability.

    We have to stop people from trying to steal. The history of the evolution of the suppression of free riding is that we must expand our definition of property with the expansion of what we use as property. The commons is property. That property can be polluted with lies, or constantly maintained by truthful debate.

    It’s not that complicated. We’ve been doing it mostly right for 4500 years.

    I work by constructing arguments out of necessary propositions constrained by a few assumptions: liberty, prosperity, and rates of innovation that improve our genetic competitiveness against others who are doing the same. Our western strength has been the degree with which we have maintained conceptual correspondence with reality while increasing the population we cooperate with. This turns out to produce the greatest rate of innovation of any civilization, allow us out here on the fringe to ‘come from behind’ repeatedly.

    The side effect is that we get to profit from selling these innovations to others, just as others previously benefitted from selling their innovations to us. But we have always been in small numbers. And we are returning to a people of small numbers. And we have lost our advantage.

    So when I work I run down ideas and test them via argument. some of them succeed and some of them fail. I reinforce the ones that succeed, and discard those that fail. Sometimes I have to abandon entire strains of thought. But when I have an idea, I take it to market and find people to criticize it. And I improve it more.

    Right now I am trying to find a solution to what I call ‘lying’ or ‘shipping fraudulent intellectual product’. And while I know the basis of it, I see something very interesting out on the horizon at least as interesting as the other ideas I’ve produced.

    And so I am constructing arguments that function as a bridge that extends in that direction.

    Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-01 07:45:00 UTC

  • RESTATING MACDONALD: THE FULL POLITICAL SPECTRUM OF ADVOCACY OK, so extending on

    RESTATING MACDONALD: THE FULL POLITICAL SPECTRUM OF ADVOCACY

    OK, so extending on Macdonald, Critique is a method of attacking western civilization by all possible political ideologies, from every class at once:

    ARISTOCRATIC CLASS: Straussian Neoconservatism: International critique: extension of altruistic punishment, and justification of punishment, to the rest of the world. Complaint by the Aristocratic (military) class.

    UPPER MIDDLE: Misesian Pseudoscience: Critique of the state financial system as a tool of the genetically homogenous polity. Complaint by the upper middle (financial) class.

    MIDDLE: Rothbardian libertarianism: critique of the polity as a legally, culturally, and genetically, homogenous entity for the advancement of that genetically homogenous polity. Complaint by the middle (merchant and professional) class.

    LOWER: Marxism, Pseudoscientific Socialism, Irrationalist Postmodernism: Critique of industry as a tool of the genetically homogenous polity. Complaint by lower (the working and craftsman), priestly, public intellectual, and academic classes.

    The systematic conversion of an heroic homogenous outbred polity into a guilt driven polity by exacerbating their sense of altruism and altruistic punishment – and in doing so bribing the intellectual classes to obtain populist power under democracy by justifying the altruistic punishment of, and self destruction of, the homogenous polity, to the advantage of the insurgent polity.

    IT ONLY SEEMS LIKE A LEFTIST CONSPIRACY

    It isn’t. It’s a united front against our people and our civilization from every class.

    ANTI-CONSPIRACY NOTE

    Note that I don’t see this as an intentional conspiracy, but the following of genetic and cultural incentives to exploit all available opportunities for expansion.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-01 07:39:00 UTC

  • MORAL AUTHORITY —– The Lied To Us And Ours; They Abused Our Trust; The Broke

    MORAL AUTHORITY

    —–

    The Lied To Us And Ours;

    They Abused Our Trust;

    The Broke The Contract Of Altruism.

    They Have Committed Genocide;

    And it’s Genocide Against Us;

    —–

    –And that’s the evidence not opinion–

    (Getting there. Something like that.)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 09:04:00 UTC

  • END ALTRUISM

    –END ALTRUISM–

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 08:44:00 UTC

  • “WE ARE EQUAL IN OUR ARISTOCRACY, AND UNEQUAL IN OUR COMMONERS AND PEASANTRY” We

    “WE ARE EQUAL IN OUR ARISTOCRACY, AND UNEQUAL IN OUR COMMONERS AND PEASANTRY”

    We cannot create an aristocracy of everybody.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 08:41:00 UTC

  • The dim talk about feelings. The well intentioned talk about beliefs. And the wi

    The dim talk about feelings. The well intentioned talk about beliefs. And the wise talk about institutions.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-30 13:55:00 UTC