Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • THE SECTS OF LIBERTARIANISM (worth repeating) Libertarianism: a preference for l

    THE SECTS OF LIBERTARIANISM

    (worth repeating)

    Libertarianism: a preference for liberty as the first priority, where liberty is defined as a monopoly of control over myself, and any thing I have obtained through homesteading (first use), voluntary exchange, or transformation thereof. And that all political goods must be willingly constructed rather than involuntarily constructed. That is pretty much the extent of it. My work is an attempt to provide solutions for creating complex and desirable commons voluntarily rather than through a monopoly of majoritarian dictatorship.

    Prior generations of ‘libertarians’ from the cosmopolitan sect (Jewish Enlightenment) of liberty have attempted to disavow all possible construction of the commons, whereas classical liberals (in both German and English Enlightenment sects) maintain the civic society as a means of voluntarily producing the commons.

    However it is only possible to produce commons in a society where people refrain from consuming the commons, and only Europeans appear to have constructed a society where individuals do not consume commons that are reserved from consumption.

    We can easily distinguish Jewish and European libertarianism by whether or not they deny responsibility to pay for voluntarily constructed commons versus whether they obligate us to pay for voluntarily constructed commons. The civic commons is the western European competitive advantage, while promoting consumption at all costs is the cosmopolitan evolutionary strategy.

    There is nothing illogical about these opposing strategies. European martial land owners must pay high costs for preserving control over territory necessary to construct productive resources, while jewish transitory merchants benefit by the opposite strategy of profiting from trade and consumption.

    Theoretically these are not incompatible strategies. In history they have been incompatible strategies.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 15:41:00 UTC

  • THE REASON THE WEST IS HESITANT TO GRANT MONEY TO UKRAINE (important)(pervasive

    THE REASON THE WEST IS HESITANT TO GRANT MONEY TO UKRAINE

    (important)(pervasive Russian corruption and sympathizers in the bureaucracy)

    Entry into the western family of countries requires the elimination of Russian Kleptocracy (systemic corruption) that was endemic under Russian backed administrations. It does no good to give Ukraine money or access to Europe, if this corruption is not eradicated. (And this is why Russia is fighting so hard in Ukraine, because if Ukraine can, like Poland, evolve out of a low-trust, high-corruption, kleptocracy in the absence of Russian influence, then so can Russia and the Russian people. To prevent loss of control (Putin is now wealthier than bill gates), Putin and his ThinkTanks have used the press to convince Russians that they are not white (european) and that the west is engaged in suicide that the Russians must defend against, thus making them non-european. And therefore justifying totalitarianism (russian kelptocracy).

    UKRAINE’S COMING PURGE OF RUSSIAN SYMPATHIZERS

    Ukraine has just started a new organization, whose purpose is to cleanse the Ukrainian bureaucracy of corruption (russian-sympathzing kleptocrats, as well as corrupt Ukrainians). This new organizatino is structured as a new independent police force in a rigid hierarchy and entry into these positions requires that applications possess experience in business and industry and NOT IN GOVERNMENT. (yes you heard that right. what if we did that in the states?) The salaries for these jobs are high enough that graft and corruption are hard to accomplish.

    BIOMETRIC PASSPORTS

    So, in order to issue biometric passports they must first purge the ranks, show europeans that they can reliably issue passports, and demonstrate that the passports themselves and the equipment will not fall into Russian and Russian-sympathizing hands.

    Trust matters, everywhere and everywhere. Diversity destroys trust. You cannot invade ukraine with russians and create trust, any more than you can invade any other populace with a competitor and create trust.

    WHY RUSSIA HAS A MORAL ARGUMENT: WESTERN SUICIDAL MULTICULTURALISM

    The single argument that Russia has going for it is western suicidal stance on immigration. Russia promotes nationalism, as should the european countries. If not for this one problem in the west, Russia would have no argument to make. But as long as the west proceeds with its suicide through multiculturalism, equality and massive immigration, Russia will have a legitimate argument with which to separate Russian peoples from european peoples.

    The means by which we unite all circumpolar people is to re-nationalize liberalism and end the divide between west and eastern Europe.

    You might not like it but that’s just how it is.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 09:58:00 UTC

  • IMPACT ON RUSSIAN POLITICS EMERGING Impact on the economy is showing. Open defia

    IMPACT ON RUSSIAN POLITICS EMERGING

    Impact on the economy is showing. Open defiance of Putin emerging. Open refutation of Russians as non-european, even if they are less advanced culturally (low trust).

    Honestly I didn’t expect this so soon. I would have used much more aggressive tactics against the Russians, but the general strategy in the west was to destroy the political class without harming individual russian citizens.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 09:00:00 UTC

  • UKRAINE TO GET SCHENGEN VISAS NEXT YEAR Apparently the delay is in getting and i

    UKRAINE TO GET SCHENGEN VISAS NEXT YEAR

    Apparently the delay is in getting and issuing biometric passports, because the EU will not tolerate people from the east, with Russian sympathies, to enter the EU, so Ukraine must guarantee that they have processes and procedures for issuing biometric passports to only Ukrainians.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 08:58:00 UTC

  • I AM RABIDLY PRO-UKRAINIAN Why? Because I am an aristocratic libertarian. PHILOS

    I AM RABIDLY PRO-UKRAINIAN

    Why? Because I am an aristocratic libertarian.

    PHILOSOPHICALLY

    (a) all people who desire them have the right to property if they will grant the same right to others.

    (b) all peoples have the right to self determination so that they may have the right to property and organize property and family according to their needs.

    (c) all people have the right to higher levels of freedom, with more atomic property rights if they so desire it.

    (d) The aristocratic EGALITARIAN contract requires that in order to secure my liberty I must fight to extend that liberty to all who desire it, and will do the same for me. That is the meaning of ‘egalitarian’ in ‘Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarianism (open entry to all who desire it).”

    PRAGMATICALLY

    (e) Russians have created more brutality, murder and genocide than any polity other than the Chinese, and much of it against their own people – which is even worse.

    (f) Reformation of Russia and its incorporation (as Gorbachev aspired) into the european people’s is beneficial for all white peoples. Even if it is a very high cost.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 06:41:00 UTC

  • For a those of you who follow my ideas but who quietly observe without participa

    For a those of you who follow my ideas but who quietly observe without participating – whether at universities, in offices, or at home – we will restore liberty with your help.

    Welcome to the revolution. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-19 20:58:00 UTC

  • IS NO MORE CREATIVE ACT THAN CREATING A NATION” Let a thousand nations bloom

    http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/03/sean-connery-scottish-independence-there-no-more-creative-act-creating-new-nation”THERE IS NO MORE CREATIVE ACT THAN CREATING A NATION”

    Let a thousand nations bloom.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-16 23:47:00 UTC

  • just replays hitlers strategy. Media makes opinion. Any justification they want

    http://euromaidanpress.com/2014/09/15/russia-concerned-about-rights-of-russian-speakers-in-the-baltics/Russia just replays hitlers strategy. Media makes opinion. Any justification they want to. If you can find a moral story and stay on message it will win.

    If Russia is right then Hitler was right and Mexicans invading america are right.

    For my part, I am not sure I disagree with tribalism. I agree with it. However, in the choice between corruption, or against corruption, in favor of pervasive lying and against pervasive lying, in favor of prosperity or in favor of poverty, in favor of high trust or in favor of low trust, I choose to be against corruption and against pervasive lying, in favor of prosperity, in favor of high trust, and against everything that Russia stands for and does.

    This is just how it is. Bring your invading conquering, corrupt, low-trust, lie-believing, pseudoscientific Russian speakers home to the poverty of your militarism.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-16 10:57:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/books/review/francis-fukuyamas-political-order-and-political-decay.html?_r=0

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-14 17:03:00 UTC

  • Reading violence and social orders. And I am getting so angry that I want to bur

    Reading violence and social orders. And I am getting so angry that I want to burn the book.

    To create an “impersonal order” one requires a military – since only impersonal militaries can compete, the military that survives produces impersonality. This means more successful militaries produce impersonality.

    But since we also require extremely limited rents, to provide the incentives to members for an impersonal military, and against a profiteering military which would eradicate impersonality , the militia which supplies its own small arms, is the only means by which an impersonal order can evolve. A small professional warrior class dependent upon a militia provides the balance between the functional necessity of impersonality (meritocracy) and the incentive against re-personalizing for the purpose of rent seeking.

    From the military one needs to produce judges. Societies that do not produce impersonal judges, are those that do not produce impersonal militaries.

    This is why so few states developed impersonality. And by consequence equality under the law and limited corruption.

    Now, a society that can evolve some set of affairs is different from one that can choose to intentionally implement a state of affairs.

    If a group of individuals can hold military power sufficient to construct a body of law defending private property; train a staff of lawyers and judges and sheriffs (police) to operate the courts.

    These individuals can be fully aware that they are constructing impersonality in their societies. And the heroic, status, and monetary incentives will provide all that is necessary as long as, like the army, their peers do as well.

    Truth and transparence are martial virtues and only martial cultures develop them.

    As far as I know, this is an iron law if social orders.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-14 09:43:00 UTC