RON PAUL BOUGHT AND PAID FOR.
It’s fascinating to me that Ron Paul (America), just like Global Research (Canada), just like the Frankfurt School (Germany), just like the progressive think tanks, is a sucker for Russian money.
The Ron Paul Institute is now bought and paid for by the same methods the Russians spread socialism in america: get close to propagandists (intellectuals) and pay them to work in their favor.
Source date (UTC): 2015-03-30 07:43:00 UTC
My @Quora answer to What are the pros and cons of we humans building a global Utopia? http://qr.ae/QUUXc
Source date (UTC): 2015-03-26 11:28:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/581055216642060290
A SYSTEM FOR THE LOWER CLASSES?
Pay them to maintain the normative and physical commons and have only one child. Stop paying them if they don’t behave well, and sterilize them if they have an additional child. Imprison them in the desert at hard labor if they commit three strikes. I am against redistribution. But I am in favor of paying people to construct the voluntary organization of production we call property rights and the commons. And people who DON”T want to pay those classes are simply trying to make those classes pay the high price of constructing the voluntary organization of production – against their own interests. Paying people isn’t redistribution. It’s compensation. And you can be fired from the job.
Source date (UTC): 2015-03-26 07:51:00 UTC
http://www.quora.com/What-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-we-humans-building-a-global-Utopia/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1
Source date (UTC): 2015-03-26 07:28:00 UTC
I told ya. Obama is intentionally destroying america.
Source date (UTC): 2015-03-25 12:21:00 UTC
(from elsewhere)
Sean Gabb,
While I laud the criticism of our abstract arguments, I will simply point out what the data says: that libertarians fail because the left majority rejects our economic arguments, and the right rejects our moral arguments.
As I have written about somewhat extensively by now, libertarians are, according to the evidence, morally blind. Not as morally blind as progressives, but none the less, morally blind. And we consistently make immoral arguments.
The reason being that the extreme libertinism that we are propagating under the term ‘libertarian’ actively seeks to undermind construction of the commons, makes no demand for truth telling, nor for the ostracization and punishment of those who prevent the commons, and engage in deceit.
However, the west – the only people ever to produce liberty in human history – accomplished this feat through means diametrically opposed to those of the libertines: (a) participation in the violent construction of individual proprety rights in order to obtain those property rights from others in exchange. (b) the violent suppression of authority wherever it arises whenever possible, (c) the violent suppression of all deceit in all forms in all walks of life wherever it occurred, (d) the production of commons and mandatory participation in that production, (e) the ostracization, deprivation and frequent murder of those who violated commons whehter normative or physical.
Liberty is a consequence of the militia’s martial virtues.
There is no other possible means of constructing proerty ‘rights’ except as in such an exchange. There is no possibility – an absolute impossibility – to produce an anarchic polity in a low trust society without producing demand for an authoritarian state to suppress these behaviors. Any more than there is a possiblity of producing a communist society. Why? Becuase incentives for labor under the voluntary organization of production are necessary. Just as incentives for the voluntary construction of commons is necessary. Neither property, truth telling, nor contribution to the commons are of obvious short term interest. And that is why man has rarely except in the martial peoples been able to construct truth telling, trust, property, and commons.
Libertinism fails because it is a mere verbalism. A beggarly appeal. You cannot ask the under classes to cease their parasitism. You cannot ask the bureaucratic classes to cease their rent seeking. You cannot ask liars to stop lying when it is their means of survival. It is irrational for them to obey. In fact, maximum parasitism and rent seeking are the most rational course of action for all peoples.
Liberty was constructed by violence. It must be constructed by violence. It has never been constructed by persuasion. Because it is not in the interest of the many. Liberty is an aristocratic virtue. The producer of goods and services cannot ignore the demands of the producer of property rights.
And that is what libertarians are doing: carrying on an act of verbal fraud in order to avoid a trade with the producers of property rights using organize violence. They want high trust norms in exchange for the creation of order. Libertines do not want a trade. Warriors will give us our property rights in return, but only if we give them their norms.
To ask otherwise is to perpetuate an argumentative fraud by which we make a false moral appeal that we should get what we desire at a discount, while they should sell what we desire at a discount.
This is merely fraud.
And this fraud is why we fail.
Whatever happens in your home is your own business. But talking, advertising, promoting, evangelizing it is not your own business – it takes place in the normative commons. And it is that commons that conservatives produce. We merely ride upon it.
If we want our property rights we must exchange with conservatives their want of norms. No one gets what he wants en toto. All exchanges are a compromise.
If we exchange with conservatives, then we can crush the kleptocracy. And be the thought leaders of all.
Otherwise we will remain the decadent, immoral, and irrelevant in all politics.
As libertines deserve to be.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Source date (UTC): 2015-03-24 06:54:00 UTC
And women have successfully voted to destroy western property rights in every election after the first generation of women voters. Today almost all elections are decided by women, and principally by unmarried women and single mothers (see Pew). Without women voters we would never have moved to the left, destroyed the constitution, destroyed the family (the compromise), and had rampant immigration.
Until we developed paternalism, women used sex to manage extended families. Men developed property, and paternalism, and instead of a few men reproducing, many did. All advancement in human history is the product of property rights – and women have destroyed them. And destroyed the west.
So the future looks very much like the conquest of the west, and the return to greco-islamic paternalism. Why? Because women used democracy to violate the compromise that made western civilization possible.
For men, it is much more desirable to live in a paternal world. It is easy for us to dominate women. We don’t make civilization for ourselves, but for the admiration of our wives and daughters.
The only choice women have ever had was the one western men gave them. And they destroyed it with their folly and greed.
Women gossip. Women destroy each other through hen-pecking in groups. Women destroy advanced society. It’s not complicated. It’s in their nature.
Through most of history, women (gossips) were considered the root of all evil. It appears that even in advanced society, history repeats itself.
We made a mistake deifying women in the victorian era.
We were right all along.
Source date (UTC): 2015-03-24 03:20:00 UTC
[A]nd women have successfully voted to destroy western property rights in every election after the first generation of women voters. Today almost all elections are decided by women, and principally by unmarried women and single mothers (see Pew).
Without women voters we would never have moved to the left, destroyed the constitution, destroyed the family (the compromise), and had rampant immigration.
Until we developed paternalism, women used sex to manage extended families. Men developed property, and paternalism, and instead of a few men reproducing, many did. All advancement in human history is the product of property rights – and women have destroyed them. And destroyed the west.
So the future looks very much like the conquest of the west, and the return to greco-islamic paternalism. Why? Because women used democracy to violate the compromise that made western civilization possible.
For men, it is much more desirable to live in a paternal world. It is easy for us to dominate women. We don’t make civilization for ourselves, but for the admiration of our women, wives and daughters.
The only choice women have ever had was the one western men gave them. And they destroyed it with their folly and greed.
Women gossip. Women destroy each other through hen-pecking in groups. Women destroy advanced society. It’s not complicated. It’s in their nature.
Through most of history, women (gossips) were considered the root of all evil. It appears that even in advanced society, history repeats itself.
We made a mistake deifying women in the victorian era.
We were right all along.
[A]nd women have successfully voted to destroy western property rights in every election after the first generation of women voters. Today almost all elections are decided by women, and principally by unmarried women and single mothers (see Pew).
Without women voters we would never have moved to the left, destroyed the constitution, destroyed the family (the compromise), and had rampant immigration.
Until we developed paternalism, women used sex to manage extended families. Men developed property, and paternalism, and instead of a few men reproducing, many did. All advancement in human history is the product of property rights – and women have destroyed them. And destroyed the west.
So the future looks very much like the conquest of the west, and the return to greco-islamic paternalism. Why? Because women used democracy to violate the compromise that made western civilization possible.
For men, it is much more desirable to live in a paternal world. It is easy for us to dominate women. We don’t make civilization for ourselves, but for the admiration of our women, wives and daughters.
The only choice women have ever had was the one western men gave them. And they destroyed it with their folly and greed.
Women gossip. Women destroy each other through hen-pecking in groups. Women destroy advanced society. It’s not complicated. It’s in their nature.
Through most of history, women (gossips) were considered the root of all evil. It appears that even in advanced society, history repeats itself.
We made a mistake deifying women in the victorian era.
We were right all along.
FEMINISTS: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR
The first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.
Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.
For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.
In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.
5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.
And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.
So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.
Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.
The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.
Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.
We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.
Women are along for the ride.
Be careful what you wish for.
Source date (UTC): 2015-03-23 04:25:00 UTC