Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • RT @Lord__Sousa: Democracy is NOT part of the solution but part of the problem

    RT @Lord__Sousa: Democracy is NOT part of the solution but part of the problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 22:02:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705704163399680114

  • —“Would a 1968-scale Republican Election Victory prevent the violence and make t

    —“Would a 1968-scale Republican Election Victory prevent the violence and make the (US) revolution peaceful?”—

    Very difficult, but possibly. We need all three houses and the court. We have the court. And we have it solid. But all three houses, well, that’s very difficult to achieve right now. If that was possible, and we could frustrate the filibuster, we could get the necessary changes through in a ‘first 100 days’.

    Everything our organization recommends as reforms benefits everyone in in the center four-fifths, but is very hard on academy, media, and state, and devastates the corruption of consumer related finance sector that has so preyed upon our people since at least the eighties.

    Those reforms would however radically improve the condition for the laboring, working, lower middle, and middle classes that have born the burden of the post seventies decline in real wage growth. And it would restore the primacy of the family rather than the individual as the subject of policy. Which in turn would return us to common interests -since the only way diverse peoples develop a common interests is through the shared interest in the production of families as our first and most important institution.

    Can this implementation of policy be done through elections, without showing up with 2M armed men in DC? We’ll I’d like to think so. But let’s look at the four options:

    1 – We can’t win the argument because irresponsibility of the left sells – especially to single and childless women who are the sole reason for the political shift and current political collapse. (Really). So we can’t win the argument.

    2 – Can we win the vote? I don’t see it. But Americans do amazing things at times, so maybe. But otherwise, it doesn’t look like we can we in the vote.

    3 – If we can’t win the vote can we win the courts? Maybe, but it’s terribly expensive (and we’re just starting this year to try). So we are trying to win via the court – but I think we are going to run out of time.

    4 – If we can’t win in the courts, and we have no monarchy as judge of last resort, then the only remaining alternative is a common law suit against the state, repeating the declaration and constitution of the founders, and the promise of violence if our just demands are not met.

    I’m in the business of truth regardless of costs. And I’m thinking that the last option is rapidly becoming the last option available. And that option is of course permitted by our declaration and constitution, because the people, not the state, are sovereign.

    And if they keep trying to change that last bit then we must act without mercy and leave a scar on history such that it is remembered for ten thousand years – the people are sovereign. Period.

    Reply addressees: @Stealth_Bandit


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 21:22:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705694184483565568

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705689187431940231

  • I am having a very hard time seeing the country survive in it’s present form pas

    I am having a very hard time seeing the country survive in it’s present form past the next election cycle – though I’m not sure we’re quite at the inflection point yet, without the economic and geostrategic influences coinciding with the domestic social, political, and demographic.
    Again, you only need a very big strong lever to move what does not want to move on it’s own.
    The right timing, and a very small lever moves a very large object, through a vary large change.

    Reply addressees: @AryanChadG


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 17:14:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705631623817965568

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705629894007562365

  • RT @clairlemon: “The gist of Thomas Sowell’s new work is that the flawed assumpt

    RT @clairlemon: “The gist of Thomas Sowell’s new work is that the flawed assumptions of social-justice activists are endangering Western so…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 05:23:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705452731312349383

  • RT @NoahRevoy: If you can have mass immigration against the wishes of the native

    RT @NoahRevoy: If you can have mass immigration against the wishes of the native population you can have mass repatriation against the wish…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 01:44:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705397723095028197

  • I’m only really interested in that group consisting of people like you. It’s up

    I’m only really interested in that group consisting of people like you. It’s up to you to communicate to normies. I don’t see that as my job. Empowering you is.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 00:51:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705384318921834739

    Reply addressees: @JarradDanielLee

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705381491356885206

  • RT @songpinganq: Many people tell me “China is safe”. Remember every year China

    RT @songpinganq: Many people tell me “China is safe”.

    Remember every year China executes more people than the rest of the world combined,…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-22 21:34:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705334811181580305

  • Ask Alberta to join the USA and guarantee the preservation of their health care

    Ask Alberta to join the USA and guarantee the preservation of their health care system at the state level. Weill get everyone except lower Ontario and Quebec – who nobody wants anyway. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-22 21:33:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705334588552143169

    Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson @ABDanielleSmith

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705334053182812607

  • The pathetic pettiness of (especially female) government employees. Because of t

    The pathetic pettiness of (especially female) government employees.

    Because of the new laws that require all IDs are exactly the same, and because I have an eccentric Anglo Saxon name and ‘nickname’ or more formally ‘alias’, I’m on a year long journey to reproduce all the identification necessary to exist in the USA as a legal entity. (Which is obviously an issue in and of itself that we need such things.)

    So today I’m spending my energy sufficient for one errand at the Deprtment of Motor Vehicles in Connecticut. Now remember, Connecticut aside from it’s history as the US Armory, most copied the Soviet Bureaucracy, and so is the state most burdensome, for both citizens and the few businesses that have not departed for the same reason.

    Now, in my preferences I generally go to the Connecticut shore where I have more chance of waiting in line with and being served by my own people, who will, knowing cues, address and serve me, knowing I will reciprocate respectably.

    But certain services are not offered there, so I’m in the one near Hartford, which is in a competition with Baltimore, New Haven Meriden and Bridgeport for turning once elegant Anglo cities of the puritans into sh—holes of poverty risk and nihilism.

    So, after sorting out my paperwork, I return to the front information counter to ask a question, where two young men of obviously MENA background are trying to explain that they have no car, spent a long time getting here, and will wait. They are demonstrating perfect manners, and respect, and good nature. Which is, in the end, all that should be necessary to participate in western civilization’s administrative burden – regardless of their cultural compatibility outside of it.

    While one woman has given up talking to them, and called in another more senior, they men are constant in saying they will wait, even though the mistake they re trying to correct is quite obviously one made by the staff who just moments ago served them. But the staff does not ‘save’ draft data, so the data must be re-entered.

    Now I’m reading this correctly in that the younger woman does not like these men, does not want to admit that the staff failed them, and wants them to go away and wait additional days for another appointment – in pure soviet bureaucratic fashion. (Which I have some experienced with. The difference is that you can bribe the ex soviet people overseas and they will happily help you – and it’s even expensive. )

    So the older woman is not even considering how to help these young men, but she is merely girl-defending her younger colleague.

    I’m watching this clown show and the rudeness and inconsiderate and offensive behavior against two young men who are displaying every semblance of pleasantry manners and respect.

    So finally the older woman gives in.

    And so I say to the two men, “Good manners guys.” And smile.

    Which of course inspires a look of hatred from the young woman at the station. Now, I’m next so I ask her to confirm my number because in shifting through my realms of paperwork I seem to have misplaced it.

    Fifteen minutes before, when another man was joyfully performing the same role at the same place, he looked up my name, and gave me a ticket.

    So, cunning little petty child that she is, she asked me for the number that’s on the paper in front of her. I said its right there. She responded with that I should give her the number so she didn’t have to look it up. Now at this point I’m laughing internally for myself, but just adding another grain of sand to the scale of revolutionary intolerance for the treatment of my people by those unworthy to even speak to them with other than love, kindness, and respect.

    We can very easily train people in customer service and stress de escalation as easily as we can train police in de escalation, but we don’t do it, and don’t require it for positions serving the public. If we did, the pay for public service and it’s quality would rise rapidly in concert.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-22 19:10:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705298465746468864

  • Conservatives don’t run scams. Look at the data. 😉

    Conservatives don’t run scams. Look at the data. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-22 17:34:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705274441918218607

    Reply addressees: @antigg860413 @KonstantinKisin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705259667373335017