Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Monopoly Thinking is Endemic in Democracy and Monotheism, but Not Polytheism and Propertarianism

      [I] see class theory as a set of elites in each of four disciplines of only three of which produce political coercion: 1) Violence(male conservative)/Law, 2) Gossip(female progressive)/Speech 3) Remuneration (male)/Trade, 4) Transformation(male and female)/Production-Craftsmanship. With Transformation not producing elites other than scientists (who are weak influencers). And with some groups succeeding in combining more than one means of coercion in the same group of elites. (Priest/Kings for example).

    I see humans a negotiators for their part of the spectrum of the reproductive division of perception, cognition, labor and advocacy. 1) Female consumption, short term (progressive) 2) Male biased production, medium term (libertarian) 3) Male accumulation, long term (conservative) And that through voluntary exchange we ‘calculate’ the optimum for the group, despite the fact that none of us senses the entire spectrum sufficiently to make a general judgement. I see the creative, productive, and ‘true’ processes as merely different points on the timeline of knowledge development: Knowledge Evolution | Production | Norm Evolution 0) Inspiring (sensing and perceiving) | (feeling) 1) Hypothesis |(free association) | (idea) 2) Theorizing | (experimentation) | (trial and error) 3) Law | (production) | (habit) 4) “True” | (truth statement) | (norm) So I don’t interpret a hierarchy of these different perspectives, but excellences in all three, each of which advocates for his temporal constituency. So my understanding is not one of ‘one-ness’, ‘or penultimate man’, or ‘hierarchy’, but that each of us supplies specialization in some domain. And that as needs emerge and opportunities emerge, we make use of the elites in that period with the ability to best lead us into exploiting it. In other words, I merely describe what is, not what I think should be. I don’t try to say that we should do X, only that if we want to evolve that we must NOT do things that prevent us from doing so. There is no recipe for free association (creativity). There are recipes for testing your hypotheses, such that we warranty that they are free of externality. Thanks

  • Revolution Is A Simple Matter To Bring About

    [R]evolution requires (a) one weapon: fire (b) shorting power lines (c) blocking roads (d) making police, fire and emergency workers fear to leave their barracks (e) encouraging the military to intervene, (f) collapsing both the economy and the government by the persistence of military occupation, and slowly enfranchising the military so that they take over the government. We pushed them out of europe before. We can push them out again. If we allied with the Russians and the Chinese we could push them out of existence. They are the enemy of libertarian and authoritarian civilization alike.

    The truth is enough. The truth at all costs. One needs incentive (our genocide), moral authority (we have been lied to), something to demand (a radical restructuring of government), a plan for transition (a body of thought), and a plan by which we raise the cost of the status quo until there is no alternative. Liberty in our lifetimes.

  • Revolution Is A Simple Matter To Bring About

    [R]evolution requires (a) one weapon: fire (b) shorting power lines (c) blocking roads (d) making police, fire and emergency workers fear to leave their barracks (e) encouraging the military to intervene, (f) collapsing both the economy and the government by the persistence of military occupation, and slowly enfranchising the military so that they take over the government. We pushed them out of europe before. We can push them out again. If we allied with the Russians and the Chinese we could push them out of existence. They are the enemy of libertarian and authoritarian civilization alike.

    The truth is enough. The truth at all costs. One needs incentive (our genocide), moral authority (we have been lied to), something to demand (a radical restructuring of government), a plan for transition (a body of thought), and a plan by which we raise the cost of the status quo until there is no alternative. Liberty in our lifetimes.

  • The Intertemporal Division of Coercive Specialization

    [C]oercive Specialization: Conservative, Libertarian, and Progressive May / may not = conservative. Can / can not = libertarian. Should / should not = Progressive.
    Accumulate = conservative. Produce = libertarian. Consume = progressive. K selection = conservative.* Exchange selection = libertarian.* R selection = progressive.* Long term = conservative. Medium term = libertarian. Short term = progressive. Law = conservative. Trade = libertarian. Gossip = progressive. Commodity Money (gold) = conservative. Fiduciary Media (notes) = libertarian. Fiat Currency (shares) = progressive. Force : Law (limit on parasitism) : Conservatism. Remuneration. : Trade (utility) : Libertarianism. Gossip (shaming) : Religion and Norms ( deprivation of opportunity to cooperate) : Progressivism. There exist only three technologies of coercion. It should not surprise us that humans specialize in each. Or that we should organize into groups led by specialists in each. Of that some would master more than one : Statism: Lying(gossip), bribing(remuneration) and commanding (law). Or that mastery of a positive use of coercion would also produce mastery of a negative use of coercion. The only “truth” we can ever know in politics, is productive, fully informed voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs by externality. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine * “K” is for carrying capacity. “r” is for rate of growth. If you have limited resources, you need competition, that’s where K excels – The male reproductive strategy. If you have free resources, your best option is to grow wildly, that’s where r excels – The female reproductive strategy. Exchange reproductive strategy refers to the strategy of ‘homo economicus’: productivity.

  • The Intertemporal Division of Coercive Specialization

    [C]oercive Specialization: Conservative, Libertarian, and Progressive May / may not = conservative. Can / can not = libertarian. Should / should not = Progressive.
    Accumulate = conservative. Produce = libertarian. Consume = progressive. K selection = conservative.* Exchange selection = libertarian.* R selection = progressive.* Long term = conservative. Medium term = libertarian. Short term = progressive. Law = conservative. Trade = libertarian. Gossip = progressive. Commodity Money (gold) = conservative. Fiduciary Media (notes) = libertarian. Fiat Currency (shares) = progressive. Force : Law (limit on parasitism) : Conservatism. Remuneration. : Trade (utility) : Libertarianism. Gossip (shaming) : Religion and Norms ( deprivation of opportunity to cooperate) : Progressivism. There exist only three technologies of coercion. It should not surprise us that humans specialize in each. Or that we should organize into groups led by specialists in each. Of that some would master more than one : Statism: Lying(gossip), bribing(remuneration) and commanding (law). Or that mastery of a positive use of coercion would also produce mastery of a negative use of coercion. The only “truth” we can ever know in politics, is productive, fully informed voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs by externality. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine * “K” is for carrying capacity. “r” is for rate of growth. If you have limited resources, you need competition, that’s where K excels – The male reproductive strategy. If you have free resources, your best option is to grow wildly, that’s where r excels – The female reproductive strategy. Exchange reproductive strategy refers to the strategy of ‘homo economicus’: productivity.

  • PUTIN KILLS THE AMBITIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER Putin just killed the new world

    PUTIN KILLS THE AMBITIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

    Putin just killed the new world order for us. And as long as he does not attempt to expand his borders then I am all in.

    The western attempt to spread democracy, human rights has failed.

    We have spread consumer capitalism, Aristotelian thought (scientific thinking), medicine, technology, rule of law – technologies that are culturally independent.

    But our attempt to remake the world in the neopuritan vision has been as catastrophic abroad as it has been at home.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-08 11:42:00 UTC

  • A Conviction, A Prayer, A Threat, and A Promise – Of Violence

    —I am not concerned with should, I am concerned with shall. Not in persuasion but compliance. Not in tolerance but in expurgation. Not in compromise but in defeat. Not in accommodation but deportation. And should deportation fail, not conciliation, but in hanging, impaling, crucifixion and pyres. There is a vast difference between convenience and conviction, between discount and premium. Between excuse for inaction and bearing costly action. And those empty verbal “should’s, requests, pleas, and demands”, are a deceit by which to obscure taking an unearned discount,  by justifying inaction, and by inaction, creating a theft from one’s ancestors, ones peers and all generations that might follow. And so there is plenty rope, pole, lumber, and pyre for such lairs, cheaters, and thieves as well as those they pretend to defend, but merely seek to escape the costs of defending against.  And we shall hang, impale, crucify and burn those that fail to act, as well as those who commit violence, lie, cheat and steal in the name of their invasion.— Violence is a virtue when put to virtuous ends.

  • A Conviction, A Prayer, A Threat, and A Promise – Of Violence

    —I am not concerned with should, I am concerned with shall. Not in persuasion but compliance. Not in tolerance but in expurgation. Not in compromise but in defeat. Not in accommodation but deportation. And should deportation fail, not conciliation, but in hanging, impaling, crucifixion and pyres. There is a vast difference between convenience and conviction, between discount and premium. Between excuse for inaction and bearing costly action. And those empty verbal “should’s, requests, pleas, and demands”, are a deceit by which to obscure taking an unearned discount,  by justifying inaction, and by inaction, creating a theft from one’s ancestors, ones peers and all generations that might follow. And so there is plenty rope, pole, lumber, and pyre for such lairs, cheaters, and thieves as well as those they pretend to defend, but merely seek to escape the costs of defending against.  And we shall hang, impale, crucify and burn those that fail to act, as well as those who commit violence, lie, cheat and steal in the name of their invasion.— Violence is a virtue when put to virtuous ends.

  • In Defense of Trump

    ( RE: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/tama-starr-ugly-art-trump-deals-article-1.2422470? ) [T]amara Starr is merely unsophisticated, and lacks understanding of the construction business, in which the majority of players first underbid to win, then engage in scamming the developer – the one who has the money – due to asymmetry of information: subcontractors know their craft and the developer cannot. So the developer’s rational strategy is to force all parties into negotiations post delivery. In general the rule of thumb is that profitability of construction projects is obtained in court, as the only possible way to force subcontractors into truthful accounting, because they are under threat of perjury, and prosecution for lying to the court rather than just to the developer. This is very similar to international relations where no parties deal ethically and most have little concept of it and many see ethical negotiation as stupidity or weakness. That is why trump is the perfect man for this stage of Americas development. Unfortunately, as ms Starr demonstrates, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Or more technically: The Dunning-Kruger effect is Everywhere. Curt Doolittle, the Propertarian Institute, Kiev Ukraine.

  • In Defense of Trump

    ( RE: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/tama-starr-ugly-art-trump-deals-article-1.2422470? ) [T]amara Starr is merely unsophisticated, and lacks understanding of the construction business, in which the majority of players first underbid to win, then engage in scamming the developer – the one who has the money – due to asymmetry of information: subcontractors know their craft and the developer cannot. So the developer’s rational strategy is to force all parties into negotiations post delivery. In general the rule of thumb is that profitability of construction projects is obtained in court, as the only possible way to force subcontractors into truthful accounting, because they are under threat of perjury, and prosecution for lying to the court rather than just to the developer. This is very similar to international relations where no parties deal ethically and most have little concept of it and many see ethical negotiation as stupidity or weakness. That is why trump is the perfect man for this stage of Americas development. Unfortunately, as ms Starr demonstrates, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Or more technically: The Dunning-Kruger effect is Everywhere. Curt Doolittle, the Propertarian Institute, Kiev Ukraine.