Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Untitled

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 04:01:00 UTC

  • The Market Determines The Level of Suppression Necessary for a Stateless Polity

    [N]ow, without protection all of their accumulated potential – what we call assets – from the imposition of costs, what do people DO? Not what do we WISH they did – because that is fantasy – but what do people do? They retaliate. That’s what they do. If they can’t retaliate they constrain their risk. If their risk constraint is sufficient to inhibit their consumption, then they leave. If enough inability to retaliate occurs, and enough risk constraint occurs, and enough deprivation of consumption occurs, people leave systematically and stop coming systematically. You don’t choose the level of suppression necessary to form a stateless polity: THE MARKET FOR HUMAN COOPERATION DOES. Not sure why this is complicated for a libertine to grasp. But the market determines membership in a exitable and enterable polity. As such people will choose what is in their interest to cooperate with, boycott what is not in their interest to cooperate with, and destroy what is in their interest to destroy. This is natural law.

  • The Market Determines The Level of Suppression Necessary for a Stateless Polity

    [N]ow, without protection all of their accumulated potential – what we call assets – from the imposition of costs, what do people DO? Not what do we WISH they did – because that is fantasy – but what do people do? They retaliate. That’s what they do. If they can’t retaliate they constrain their risk. If their risk constraint is sufficient to inhibit their consumption, then they leave. If enough inability to retaliate occurs, and enough risk constraint occurs, and enough deprivation of consumption occurs, people leave systematically and stop coming systematically. You don’t choose the level of suppression necessary to form a stateless polity: THE MARKET FOR HUMAN COOPERATION DOES. Not sure why this is complicated for a libertine to grasp. But the market determines membership in a exitable and enterable polity. As such people will choose what is in their interest to cooperate with, boycott what is not in their interest to cooperate with, and destroy what is in their interest to destroy. This is natural law.

  • Is it me, or is it truth that libertines are more dishonest in debate than conse

    Is it me, or is it truth that libertines are more dishonest in debate than conservatives, but less dishonest than progressives?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-13 12:39:00 UTC

  • The Propertarian (Doolittle) Scientific Political Chart

    [T]he only meaningful notion of ‘right’ and ‘left’ that I can state existentially is k-selection (right/masculine ), vs r-selection (left/feminine-universal) since these are opposing strategies with libertarianism (voluntary cooperation) achievable as a compromise between the two strategies. (that is how I see we minority libertarians: providing a compromise between the genders through voluntary cooperation). As far as I know we must talk in at least three dimensions to discuss options on political orders. 1 - Organization of production - distribution of property 2 - Organization of production of the commons - the fruits of production 3 - Organization of Reproduction - National(kin) or Corporate(kin-independent) And to construct these organizations we require incentives: 4 - Weapon of Influence (methods of organization) So it is indeed impossible to construct an r-selected order non-parasitically. Because that’s precisely what it means. And it is so because we must produce incentive to engage in costly production if we are human (k-selection), even though the herd must just graze on whatever grass is available (r-selection). This is the Doolittle chart, not the Nolan Chart. This chart unifies all disciplines from biology to politics to economics. This chart is consistently explanatory across all political orders. So as far as I know any OTHER method of representing the organization of Production(consumption), commons(investment) and reproduction(perpetuation) is a distraction for the purpose of achieving an alternate end other than the true and moral. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Propertarian (Doolittle) Scientific Political Chart

    [T]he only meaningful notion of ‘right’ and ‘left’ that I can state existentially is k-selection (right/masculine ), vs r-selection (left/feminine-universal) since these are opposing strategies with libertarianism (voluntary cooperation) achievable as a compromise between the two strategies. (that is how I see we minority libertarians: providing a compromise between the genders through voluntary cooperation). As far as I know we must talk in at least three dimensions to discuss options on political orders. 1 - Organization of production - distribution of property 2 - Organization of production of the commons - the fruits of production 3 - Organization of Reproduction - National(kin) or Corporate(kin-independent) And to construct these organizations we require incentives: 4 - Weapon of Influence (methods of organization) So it is indeed impossible to construct an r-selected order non-parasitically. Because that’s precisely what it means. And it is so because we must produce incentive to engage in costly production if we are human (k-selection), even though the herd must just graze on whatever grass is available (r-selection). This is the Doolittle chart, not the Nolan Chart. This chart unifies all disciplines from biology to politics to economics. This chart is consistently explanatory across all political orders. So as far as I know any OTHER method of representing the organization of Production(consumption), commons(investment) and reproduction(perpetuation) is a distraction for the purpose of achieving an alternate end other than the true and moral. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • It should be obvious that the (a) Doolittle (Scientific) Political Chart and the

    It should be obvious that the (a) Doolittle (Scientific) Political Chart and the (b) Western Philosophical Hierarchy post, are compatible since western libertarian compromise/exchange/sovereignty society occupies the middle (compromise) position.

    It is not so obvious that this is a superior method for humans to CALCULATE their actions in real time.

    But If I flesh out the chart with the alternative metaphysical hierarchies then it will be fairly obvious how all of these philosophies map to strategies. I’m just afraid that it will be too complex for mere mortals.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-13 05:36:00 UTC

  • THE DOOLITTLE (SCIENTIFIC) POLITICAL CHART The only meaningful notion of ‘right’

    THE DOOLITTLE (SCIENTIFIC) POLITICAL CHART

    The only meaningful notion of ‘right’ and ‘left’ that I can state existentially is k-selection (right/masculine ), vs r-selection (left/feminine-universal) since these are opposing strategies with libertarianism (voluntary cooperation) achievable as a compromise between the two strategies. (that is how I see we minority libertarians: providing a compromise between the genders through voluntary cooperation).

    As far as I know we must talk in at least three dimensions to discuss options on political orders.

    1 – Organization of production – distribution of property

    <—centralized—————-meritocratic—————–equal—>

    <—tyranny———————-liberty———————-communism->

    2 – Organization of production of the commons – the fruits of production

    <—-centralized—————meritocratic—————- equal—>

    <—-tyranny———————–liberty——————–communism->

    3 – Organization of Reproduction – National(kin) or Corporate(kin-independent)

    <—-authoritarian(personal)—–kin/nation————corporate–>

    <—-???——————————Eugenic—————Dysgenic—>

    <—K-selection…………………. merit selection…….. r-selection—>

    And to construct these organizations we require incentives:

    4 – Weapon of Influence (methods of organization)

    <—-Violence———————–Exchange————-Gossip——–>

    <—-Loss of Life/harm…..loss of consumption….loss of cooperation–>

    <—-Promise of safety….promise of consumption… promise of cooperation->

    So it is indeed impossible to construct an r-selected order non-parasitically. Because that’s precisely what it means. And it is so because we must produce incentive to engage in costly production if we are human (k-selection), even though the herd must just graze on whatever grass is available (r-selection).

    This is the Doolittle chart, not the Nolan Chart.

    This chart unifies all disciplines from biology to politics to economics.

    This chart is consistently explanatory across all political orders.

    So as far as I know any OTHER method of representing the organization of Production(consumption), commons(investment) and reproduction(perpetuation) is a distraction for the purpose of achieving an alternate end other than the true and moral.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-13 05:28:00 UTC

  • DISHONEST PHRASE OF THE YEAR: “Government Gridlock” ……………………….

    DISHONEST PHRASE OF THE YEAR:

    “Government Gridlock”

    ………………………………Translation:

    ……………………………………………”Failure of my party to get what I want”.

    In other words our government is working perfectly.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-12 13:37:00 UTC

  • #NRx #libertarian #conservative #Altright #tlot

    #NRx #libertarian #conservative #Altright #tlot https://t.co/oDjspTOmpc

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-10 16:47:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/686227930926694400