Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Why aren’t more Rothbardian libertines angry that they were duped? Why aren’t mo

    Why aren’t more Rothbardian libertines angry that they were duped?

    Why aren’t more classical liberal libertarians angry that they were ignored?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-06 09:09:00 UTC

  • What is the Source of Political Power? Organizing Using Three Tools of Coercion.

    –“Curt: Political power ultimately originates from Economics or exchange, right?”—

    [I] am not sure I understand this question. There are three methods of power: 1) force, 2) payment, 3) gossip. One can use those three methods exclusively or in combination to band together into groups or hierarchies, and the focus the group’s efforts on the application of force, payment, or gossip (rallying/shaming/including/ostracizing). Political power – meaning anything ranging from monopoly producer of commons to a distributed production of commons – can be constructed from any one or combination of, those methods of coercion. Political power originates in the ability of humans to organize and coerce. It just so happens that we use gossip to rally and shame and ostracize people from production and opportunity for consumption. But then we scale. It just so happens that you need to use violence to suppress parasitism sufficiently for a market to form, at that scale. But then we scale further. And then to use law to suppress cheating, fraud, and to impose performance, and restitution, and if necessary, punishment. But then we scale further. And then we use wealth created by the application of violence and law and to force market participation rather than parasitism, to pay off those who cannot be forced. And then, we hit the novel inflection point, and scale further: And so we then use force, law and gossip to suppress the suppressors, and rely entirely upon rule of law, without a group that exercises power. So the sooner one develops rule of law, the sooner one starts suppressing the parasitism of the monopoly. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • What is the Source of Political Power? Organizing Using Three Tools of Coercion.

    –“Curt: Political power ultimately originates from Economics or exchange, right?”—

    [I] am not sure I understand this question. There are three methods of power: 1) force, 2) payment, 3) gossip. One can use those three methods exclusively or in combination to band together into groups or hierarchies, and the focus the group’s efforts on the application of force, payment, or gossip (rallying/shaming/including/ostracizing). Political power – meaning anything ranging from monopoly producer of commons to a distributed production of commons – can be constructed from any one or combination of, those methods of coercion. Political power originates in the ability of humans to organize and coerce. It just so happens that we use gossip to rally and shame and ostracize people from production and opportunity for consumption. But then we scale. It just so happens that you need to use violence to suppress parasitism sufficiently for a market to form, at that scale. But then we scale further. And then to use law to suppress cheating, fraud, and to impose performance, and restitution, and if necessary, punishment. But then we scale further. And then we use wealth created by the application of violence and law and to force market participation rather than parasitism, to pay off those who cannot be forced. And then, we hit the novel inflection point, and scale further: And so we then use force, law and gossip to suppress the suppressors, and rely entirely upon rule of law, without a group that exercises power. So the sooner one develops rule of law, the sooner one starts suppressing the parasitism of the monopoly. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • A Short Course In The Transaction Cost Theory of Government

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/ THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/ GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/ FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/ THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/ PEAK HUMAN http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/ THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

  • A Short Course In The Transaction Cost Theory of Government

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/ THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/ GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/ FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/ THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/ PEAK HUMAN http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/ THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

  • SHORT COURSE IN THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPR

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/A SHORT COURSE IN THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/

    THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/

    GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/

    FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/

    THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/

    PEAK HUMAN

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/

    THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-03 08:18:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF POLITICAL POWER? –“Curt: Political power ultimately origi

    WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF POLITICAL POWER?

    –“Curt: Political power ultimately originates from Economics or exchange, right?”—

    I am not sure I understand this question.

    There are three methods of power: 1) force, 2) payment, 3) gossip.

    One can use those three methods exclusively or in combination to band together into groups or hierarchies, and the focus the group’s efforts on the application of force, payment, or gossip (rallying/shaming/including/ostracizing).

    Political power – meaning anything ranging from monopoly producer of commons to a distributed production of commons – can be constructed from any one or combination of, those methods of coercion.

    Political power originates in the ability of humans to organize and coerce.

    It just so happens that we use gossip to rally and shame and ostracize people from production and opportunity for consumption.

    But then we scale.

    It just so happens that you need to use violence to suppress parasitism sufficiently for a market to form, at that scale.

    But then we scale further.

    And then to use law to suppress cheating, fraud, and to impose performance, and restitution, and if necessary, punishment.

    But then we scale further.

    And then we use wealth created by the application of violence and law and to force market participation rather than parasitism, to pay off those who cannot be forced.

    And then, we hit the novel inflection point, and scale further:

    And so we then use force, law and gossip to suppress the suppressors, and rely entirely upon rule of law, without a group that exercises power.

    So the sooner one develops rule of law, the sooner one starts suppressing the parasitism of the monopoly.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-03 06:23:00 UTC

  • Politicians vote their obligations. You cannot fix this. Man follows incentives.

    Politicians vote their obligations.

    You cannot fix this. Man follows incentives.

    Replace elected politicians with juries chosen by lot.

    Replace bills with petitions.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 06:25:00 UTC

  • ( The suffrage movement was originally developed in response to the wealth of th

    ( The suffrage movement was originally developed in response to the wealth of the industrial revolution. The Feminist movement was developed in an effort to replace Patriarchy with Matriarchy. But there is a reason no societies are Matriarchal: they are easily conquered if men do not defend the female herd from other male packs. In other words, one of the central problems with the formation of any ‘society’ is providing men with the incentive to defend a commons.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-29 14:24:00 UTC

  • THE SNAKE EATS ITS TAIL: THE SIGNAL-CRASH OF SOCIALISTS —“Bakunin – more than

    THE SNAKE EATS ITS TAIL: THE SIGNAL-CRASH OF SOCIALISTS

    —“Bakunin – more than a century ago – observed that socialists are liable to under-cut each other under the influence of tribalism. It’s all good music to me.”— Ayelam Valentine Agaliba

    There are many variations of “you eventually run out of other people’s money”… You also run out of civilizational, institutional, cultural, economic, normative, and genetic capital.

    If you want more, produce more.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-25 02:20:00 UTC