http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/710763746772303872/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=710763746772303872THE EVIL 80’s
#libertarian #conservative #altright #NRx https://t.co/KIiR1J0XS4
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 05:44:00 UTC
“NOMOCRATIC KIN-CONTRACTUALISM UNDER MARKET GOVERNMENT WITH A HEREDITARY JUDGE OF THE COMMONS”
Some of us understand that the holy grail of government is a scientific government: that being rule of law. The problem with constructing rule of law by means of discovering conflicts, is that we have always sought the first principles of that law. And they are … inconvenient for leadership and parasites.
It is not so much that we need meritocracy, but that we need to remove all parasitism. It is not so much that we need individualism, but that we need to remove all collective parasitism. It is not that we need kings to rule, it is that we need kings to veto those agreements that conduct parasitism against future generations. It is not so much that we need rule, as that we need decidability in matters of conflict. It is not so much that we need government, as that we need a method of constructing competitive commons. It is not so much that we should be universally gregarious, as it is that we should attempt to fund every opportunity for reducing in-group transaction costs.
I can continue. But most of political history can be reduced to justificationism in an effort to construct an artwork out of adding clay from the earth of cooperation, and most of scientific history can be reduced to criticism in an effort to construct an artwork by removing unwanted stone with the chisel of violence. We must do both: construct our art of cooperation while removing the unwanted parasitism.
This is science in government. And the discipline of science in government is natural, common, organic, distributed, universally applicability under universal standing ,
Economic science then is NOT the theory of the social sciences, but the science of the production of commons, and all of that theory must take place within, and be bound by, this science of natural law.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 05:28:00 UTC
—“The Trump campaign is not a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. It is a rebellion of shareholders who are voting to throw out the corporate officers and board of directors that ran the company into the ground.
Only the company here is our country.”— Pat B.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 02:41:00 UTC
Putin has established a military base in the region. This was his intention. No other expenditure of effort is necessary.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Russia-leaving-Syria
It’s impossible. It’s fairly easy to determine almost all candidates by the time they are 25.
https://www.quora.com/What-should-I-do-in-order-to-become-Prime-Minister-in-the-future-or-President
Putin has established a military base in the region. This was his intention. No other expenditure of effort is necessary.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Russia-leaving-Syria
It’s impossible. It’s fairly easy to determine almost all candidates by the time they are 25.
https://www.quora.com/What-should-I-do-in-order-to-become-Prime-Minister-in-the-future-or-President
Like “meritocratic communism” it is either an impossibility, or a lie. Most likely a lie to cover an impossibility. Most such lies are created in order to perpetuate fraud by political means by making false moral appeals in an effort to avoid exchanging behavioral limitations for material rewards.
Libertarianism: universal individual ownership of property, and voluntarily constructed commons.
Socialism: Universal state ownership of property, and the involuntarily constructed commons, where bureaucratic or authoritarian leaders determine the assignments of work and the distribution of proceeds from the work – (which usually don’t end up existing) Socialism is a failed experiment.
Mixed economy: Involuntary organization of the production of commons using representatives who appropriate the proceeds of production. Plus the voluntary organization of production of goods and services which generates the proceeds that are later redistributed as commons. This is in practice the western model since voters demonstrably do not vote for policy but ideology.
Direct Economic/market Democracy: The voluntary organization of the production of commons by voting for desired commons with the contributions that one has produced. Combined with the voluntary organization of production of goods and services which generates the proceeds some portion of which are used to produce commons. In this model competitive commons are possible, and no monopoly commons are necessary. But competitive commons are class-weighted. This is an unlikely experiment except in small, very wealthy communities.
Direct Redistributive/Shareholder Democracy: The voluntary organization of the production of commons by voting a SHARE of the proceeds from a mixed economy. Combined with the voluntary organization of production of goods and services, which generates the proceeds some portino of which are used to produce commons. This means meritocratic contribution to commons but egalitarian decision of commons. In this model competitive commons are possible, and no monopoly commons are necessary. This is a likely next generation of Government since it eliminates the unnecessary conflcit of monopoly commons and eliminates the existence of politicians who engage in corruption.
We must organize cooperation (morality)
We must organize reproduction (family)
We must organize production (market)
We must organize commons (government)
We must organize a monopoly with which to hold our territory (military)
If you aren’t using these terms then you’re probably engaged in error or lie.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-libertarian-communism
Isn’t 100 Million dead in one century because of a pseudoscientific economic and political system propagated by tyrants from the underclasses enough evidence? Isn’t India’s continued problem with ever-present corruption evidence?
How do you price the damage done by the soviets, the chinese, the southeast asians, the south americans, the hindus from these experiments with socialism?
The most capitalist societies provide the greatest benefits by redistribution.
The most socialist societies provide the worse benefits by redistribution.
THE ONLY PEOPLE TAUGHT ANYTHING ABOUT SOCIALISM?
Are liberal arts, and ‘extended high school’ students who are not smart enough to get into STEM classes. The kind of people who can learn by reading 100-120 IQ) but who are not smart enough to manage science (abstract empiricism). THe people who follow these mere literary believers in the sub-100 IQ space cannot be blamed. They cannot grasp these matters anyway. They imitate those that they understand.
Think of Socialism and Communism as a literary equivalent of Science Fiction and Fantasy (which constitute a libertarian movement). They are both nonsense extremes. The arose in nearly the same fashion at nearly the same times, as the myths of the new age. Socialism and communism the restatement of peasant christianity, and science fiction and fantasy the restatement of pagan aristocracy.
Rule of law under the common law under natural law, with which we suppress parasitism and free riding; the credit society under which our behavior is regulated more so by credit and job than by law and religion; and macro economics in which we attempt to stimulate production sufficiently to keep all employed; and finally genetic and cognitive science – are relatively scientific disciplines. They are not literary fantasies of socialism or science fiction.
Communism, socialism, and the myth of the horrid worker who chose the factory happily, willingly, and enthusiastically, over the subsistence of the farm, are all literary inventions. None of it is real. None of it happened.
Utopias always fail. Socialism and communism were the second attempt to spread a new religion – this time by pseudoscientific literature. The first time by religious mysticism in ancient era’s version of literature – myth.
Both have had nothing but evil consequences.
Why? Because only very stupid people believe them, and very stupid people can be led by them. Unfortunately, very stupid people make up more than half of the living population. In many countries they make up three to four fifths of the population.
We all seek justification of our reproductive strategies. The problem for the undesirable, unintelligent, and unproductive is that they are aware of their incompetence but must seek lies to justify their existences. It must be someone else’s fault. It cannot be that they are human waste products the result of dysgenic over reproduction, and the only reason they live is that we have petroleum products to keep them warm and feed them in winter… (ouch)
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
https://www.quora.com/Is-socialism-dangerous
LET ME CORRECT YOU
—Voters choose on the basis of partisan loyalties, and these days party voting has a much bigger influence on state and local elections than it used to—
Voters vote their reproductive strategies.
Our parties increasingly reflect our reproductive strategies.
Because of Forced Diversity, reproductive strategies are the greatest determinant of political preference.
This will never change.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 12:57:00 UTC