An empire with many nuclear weapons is economically, financially, diplomatically, and militarily vulnerable. Many small nation states aren’t vulnerable if armed with a few nuclear weapons, artillery, and militia. ( It certainly SEEMS like the entirety of the NATO/UN organizations are nothing more than welfare programs: desperate attempts for post-empire anglos to perpetuate by bureaucracy what they’d constructed with arms and finance. ) The Warriors must suppress parasitism creating order under which commerce and reproduction prosper. We call it law. But it is perpetual war You might unknowingly lie on behalf of your genes. And they might lie to obtain your compliance. But they’re perfectly pragmatic in purpose. Moral intuitions tell you nothing other than how to pursue your reproductive strategy in the current circumstance as you understand it. If you think or feel a condition is moral it’s the product of indoctrination. Sure, objective morality exists. But few humans practice it. History is only a guide if you (a) know enough of it, and (b) don’t cherry pick it. Man’s rational thru history. Immorality can be rational. Promise of hereafter(priests tithes), (church indulgences). Promise of socialism(vote). Promise of prosperity(academy diploma). All lies. 1) The Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit. 2) Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Academy. Two false promises to deny truth. Monotheistic Religion requires submission and submission is incompatible with sovereignty. And the experience of Liberty requires existential sovereignty. The western tradition consists is in sovereignty, heroism, empiricism, the oath (truth and non parasitism), the common judge discovered law, the jury. Cultural Marxism and Postmodernism are nothing more than an attempt to use secular pseudoscientific language as ancients used the language of mysticism: for deceit. Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media were used to defeat aristocracy, by using false promises to rally women and proles. The Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, were invented to defeat the aristocracy using false promises to rally women and proles. What’s the difference between the Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, and Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media? Nothing.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Eisenhower and Regan would have made great kings. Trump certainly would make a d
Eisenhower and Regan would have made great kings. Trump certainly would make a decent one. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-30 16:03:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/737313459734519808
Reply addressees: @politico
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/737222047336693760
IN REPLY TO:
@politico
Trump’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame is a microcosm of his campaign https://t.co/I4XjFPy46S | AP Photo https://t.co/vh7qN8jCpe
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/737222047336693760
-
REGARDING PUTIN AND THE ORTHODOX CHURCH I get it. I also get the significance of
REGARDING PUTIN AND THE ORTHODOX CHURCH
I get it. I also get the significance of pervasive corruption, the near absence of rule of law, the constructivist use of the absence of rule of law to steal companies and assets from their producers, the inability of the state to construct an advanced, productive economy, and the extensive poverty of the majority of the Russian population.
We would like it we could return to kings, and the unity of church (proletarians) burghers (merchants and craftsmen), and nobility(military).
We can do that.
But the way it must be done is to use violence to create rule of law. Not violence to create corruption.
THE SECRET TO OUR SUCCESS WAS THE LAW
Natural law governed a powerless working class, a fruitful population of burghers (merchants), a weak but wealthy and landed church, and powerful but small monarchies.
I am all for authority to impose rule of law. I am all for athority to defend the tribe, nation, and territory. But I am not all for authority to violate the natural law, nor to render western achievement back into the dark ages from whence Russia has barely climbed. Because like arabs they run on oil, not economies. Because economies require trust and the minimization of corruption.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-30 09:22:00 UTC
-
(I mean, if you support Clinton, I guess you’re just a stupid and a bad person w
(I mean, if you support Clinton, I guess you’re just a stupid and a bad person whether you know it or not. If you support Saunders you’re an stupid but good person whether you know it or not. If you support trump your an empirical and cunning person and I have no idea you’re a good or bad person.
I mean, I can’t support George Washington or George Patton or Douglas Mcarthur, so I choose the best of the available choices. )
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-30 04:08:00 UTC
-
( It certainly SEEMS like the entirety of the NATO/UN organizations are nothing
( It certainly SEEMS like the entirety of the NATO/UN organizations are nothing more than welfare programs: desperate attempts for post-empire anglos to perpetuate by bureaucracy what they’d constructed with arms and finance. )
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-30 02:36:00 UTC
-
JONES AND JOHN MACAFEE. ITS NOT THE REPUBLICANS THAT ARE TAKING OVER THE LIBERTA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icfiOdFcmUsALEX JONES AND JOHN MACAFEE. ITS NOT THE REPUBLICANS THAT ARE TAKING OVER THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY – ITS THE TRADITIONAL RIGHT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icfiOdFcmUs
—–
Dear ALEX and JOHN:
Republicans taking over the Libertarian Party? No.
The New Right, which unifies classical liberal libertarians, classical liberal conservatives, and Traditionalists is taking over the Republican and Libertarian parties, and absorbing the white middle class from the Democratic party. It is an emerging party of traditional norms.
What you see is the libertine libertarians (a demonstrably marginal group) being abandoned by the emerging New Right consensus.
Why? Because the ‘libertine libertarian’ project has been a demonstrated failure. And because ‘movement conservatism’ has been a demonstrated failure.
Liberty CAN ONLY BE obtained by and held by the organized application of violence in order to enforce rule of law, under natural law – the law of property and sovereignty over it.
But the libertine/libertarian program sought to avoid the payment for construction of normative institutional, and formal commons – and not to obtain liberty. It was a theory of inverted communism in where all property is a common – but instead desiring that no property is common. But the problem is, the west achieved liberty through the construction of commons: truth telling, jury, Judge, Natural Law, Universal Standing, Rule of Law, Common Judge Discovered Law, Martial Service, the Civic Commons (voluntary).
So libertine libertarianism is a failed, and dead strategy. Just as dead as movement conservatism, neo-conservatism, neo-liberalism. The mixed economy is necessary to compete against other economies given demographic and geographic and institutional differences between groups. Commons are necessary since rule of law and private property and a condition of liberty are produced as commons.
All organizations are formed to pursue a strategy in the interest of members. All organizations grow to the point where the rents sought by members leave the organization unable to produce new incentives in response to significant change, or shocks.
Our nation has experience the accumulation of changes and shocks caused by the attempt of the 20th century public intellectuals to assume that they could abandon hard money, rule of law, intergenerational lending, and the nuclear family, while at the same time importing vast numbers of the underclass at a time when marginal differences in productivity held by the west for 500 years are no longer a normative, institutional, and physical asset.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
( PS: Yes, Gary is a nice man. He is also a weak man. )
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-29 04:30:00 UTC
-
(I suspect there will be a show of force at the republican convention?)
(I suspect there will be a show of force at the republican convention?)
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 10:22:00 UTC
-
Every man a sheriff. Protect commons from the marxist techniques of rallying, sh
Every man a sheriff. Protect commons from the marxist techniques of rallying, shaming, loading, framing, suggestion.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 08:54:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/736480793292312576
Reply addressees: @ColonelFeraud @DJTWMAR
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/736480141803675648
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/736480141803675648
-
THE FAILURE OF THE TRADITIONALISTS TO UNDERSTAND OUR OPTIONS. At present we have
THE FAILURE OF THE TRADITIONALISTS TO UNDERSTAND OUR OPTIONS.
At present we have traditionalists that don’t understand the content of their traditions, only that through mandatory indoctrination and ritual do we behave aristocratically – in the western tradition.
The Patriarchy for example, is popular primarily by appeal to traditional (aristocratic) aesthetics. Under the assumption that the church was the originator rather than the recipient and beneficiary of the aristocratic tradition.
The Traditionalists do the same. But the church is just a temple for the weak side of the aristocracy. It’s not that we don’t need our great temples, and that we don’t need our great artistic achievements, but that
My point is not to demean the church or advocate for atheism (individualsm) rather than a civic religion (familialism). Nor is it to deny that commercial empires have been as damaging for western civilization as has been our great wars, and our invasion by christian mysticism.
My point is that we can create a civic religion out of truthful content rather than lies. Why? We do not need to appeal to a fantastic utopia that may be the home of false gods.
WE MADE THAT UTOPIA EXISTENTIAL BY OUR ANCESTORS ACTIONS.
We need no gods. Only heroes. And we have legions of them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 03:25:00 UTC
-
Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media were used to defeat aristocracy
Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media were used to defeat aristocracy, by using false promises to rally women and proles.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-28 03:03:00 UTC