Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • We must come to terms with the high cost of liberty:that the government fear the

    We must come to terms with the high cost of liberty:that the government fear the people who desire it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-27 09:24:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/758231588610138112

    Reply addressees: @HeronCall @Lead_Farmer7 @porter14159

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/758149150663860224


    IN REPLY TO:

    @HeronCall

    @curtdoolittle @Lead_Farmer7 @porter14159 Calling for blood is common place because it’s easy and anonymous. It loses force by abundance.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/758149150663860224

  • Creating and seizing an Overton window is achieved by creating a narrative durin

    Creating and seizing an Overton window is achieved by creating a narrative during the open opportunity


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-27 09:23:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/758231385509335040

    Reply addressees: @HeronCall @Lead_Farmer7 @porter14159

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/758149150663860224


    IN REPLY TO:

    @HeronCall

    @curtdoolittle @Lead_Farmer7 @porter14159 Calling for blood is common place because it’s easy and anonymous. It loses force by abundance.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/758149150663860224

  • THE UNCOMFORTABLE POLITICAL TRUTH WE MUST ADAPT TO IN THIS CENTURY Nationalism,

    THE UNCOMFORTABLE POLITICAL TRUTH WE MUST ADAPT TO IN THIS CENTURY

    Nationalism, Tribalism, Familialism are all the best POLITICAL criteria for decidability in matters of commons, just as individualism is the best criteria for decidability in matters of the individual.

    I don’t like “anti-anyone” other than perhaps I am pretty much against religions that are incompatible with natural law, and are justified by means incompatible with physical law.

    I prefer limiting immigration to the ‘highly’ skilled (I don’t include IT in that category – IT will be analogous to any other trade soon enough). And I am against the importation of calculators, managers, laborers, and underclasses, in all cases. Precisely because they may increase short-term profits at the expense of long-term genetic, institutional, and normative costs.

    But if we retain Nationalism, Tribalism, and Familialism in Political policy (positive production of commons) and Individualism in Legal policy (negative resolution of differences), then this forces groups to pay their own way genetically, institutionally, and normatively. And by doing so raise their family, tribe, and nation to transcendence.

    We do not make better people so much as we eliminate those people who are a detriment to the better people.

    And it is this reality that we must come to terms with in this century.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-27 05:22:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATISM AND THE CENTRAL OBJECTS OF LAW, POLICY, AND COMMONS. Conservatism i

    CONSERVATISM AND THE CENTRAL OBJECTS OF LAW, POLICY, AND COMMONS.

    Conservatism is not an individualist but a Familial strategy. In other words, the strategy is building good, self-insuring families.

    So conservatism eugenically suppresses weak and bad family members from the gene pool, allowing those who demonstrate willingness to transcend their familial (genetic) weaknesses through demonstrations of heroism.

    So if your family is too weak you provide you with wealth it’s a measure of your genes. And you are a representative of those genes. Through actions and choices you may transcend your family limits. Through actions and choices one can descend from a family’s achievements.

    There are four functions that play for and against your statement.

    First, the lottery effect is real and necessary (you can’t win if you don’t play) but not all people can win the lottery. This creates incentives for many at very low cost.

    Second capitalism pays us for the number of people who are willing to contribute to the production of goods and services. It’s purely a numbers game. Making cooking-matches and making symphonies is inversely rewarding; lots of people use cooking-matches.

    Third – it is extremely difficult to hold wealth over more than three generations unless you are in fact genetically superior. And that is what we see.

    Fourth – those families that demonstrate superiority over many generations are in fact demonstrating that they are a natural aristocracy – by any measure: and there are very few of them.

    THEREFORE

    The central object of law is the individual, since the individual acts.

    The central object of policy is the family.

    The central object of commons is the competitiveness of the polity.

    Insurance of various forms is a luxury we can afford or not depending upon the success of the central objects of law, policy, and polity.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine,

    (And my spiritual homes: London UK, Boston and Seattle USA) 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-27 02:22:00 UTC

  • Actually, can you think of a better place to call for bloody revolution than a f

    Actually, can you think of a better place to call for bloody revolution than a former soviet republic?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-26 08:36:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/757857014240284672

    Reply addressees: @HeronCall @Lead_Farmer7 @porter14159

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/757821300865851392


    IN REPLY TO:

    @HeronCall

    @Lead_Farmer7 @porter14159 @curtdoolittle It’s more inspiring if he weren’t calling for bloody revolution from 6000 miles away.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/757821300865851392

  • We have finally lost our guilt and regained our confidence. The postwar era is o

    We have finally lost our guilt and regained our confidence.

    The postwar era is over.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-25 14:27:00 UTC

  • ISLAMISTS USE THE MARXIST STRATEGY: PLAY TO THE DISCOUNT-SEEKING OF USEFUL IDIOT

    ISLAMISTS USE THE MARXIST STRATEGY: PLAY TO THE DISCOUNT-SEEKING OF USEFUL IDIOTS

    —“Moderates exist only to salve the anxieties of the useful idiots. They were given the right to determine customary problems, then they said that they needed a parallel judiciary. When this was achieved, they asked to be governed according to Sharia. When this was achieved the “extremists” appeared. They said that it was not right for Gods law to be checked by secular law. What was required was the entire islamisation of Nigeria. They realised this could not be achieved democratically, so they took up arms. Abacha gave them sharia and his successors got war as payment.”— Haille Mariam-Lemar


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-25 06:47:00 UTC

  • The conservative organizing principle is meritocracy, and a significant percenta

    The conservative organizing principle is meritocracy, and a significant percentage of mankind cannot productively compete.

    The primary reason being that they cannot compete productively is that they are nearly impossible to train, difficult and expensive to train, or more expensive to train than the organization of reproduction, production, and commons can tolerate.

    The conservative promise that everyone can rise if he so chooses, is false.

    The conservative belief that everyone desires liberty is false – they desire consumption. But they lack the capacity to produce other than by physical means, and under direct instruction.

    The conservative belief that we all can be raised to join the aristocracy is false – we cannot be – some of us lack the character.

    The conservative pretense that democracy is possible outside of the natural aristocracy is predicated on these lies: that we can achieve equality through discipline.

    But we have achieved our relative equality in the west through eugenics: in reproduction, in production, in commons. And commonly through warfare, and consistently through hanging (culling).

    Conservatism is a eugenic evolutionary strategy and that because of this genetic evolutionary strategy we have culled the ranks of the bottom, and limited our numbers by doing so, thereby concentrating reproduction in our best people. We have been practicing this evolutionary strategy aggressively for 1000, cautiously for 2000, in one way or another for at least 3500 if not 4500, and possibly as long as 7000 years.

    When in fact, small percentages of the (genetic)upper proletariat, much of the (genetic)lower middle class, most of the (genetic)middle class, and nearly all of the (genetic)upper middle and (genetic)upper classes can do so. This is in fact what ‘class’ means in practice. That we vary by economic class a lot, vary by social class less so, and vary by genetic class very, very little, has no impact on the fact that the primary determinant of social and economic class is genetic class.

    It is not only the left that lies. Conservatives lie as well.

    And we lie to ourselves when we try to enfranchise and convert those people without our evolutionary history, and therefore similarly narrow distributions of talents and defects.

    We – the majority genetic middle class – used the lie of democracy to seized power from the aristocracy.

    And the left – majority genetic lower class – uses it to seizes power from us.

    Democracy is a very bad idea.

    It’s unnatural.

    It’s dysgenic.

    And it is incompatible with our civilization.

    It was just an excuse to use our numbers to defeat the aristocratic minority, rather than preserve them, while ADDING ourselves – the those who organize production – to leadership in aristocratic civiization: those who organize the ability to organize economically.

    Aristocracy made us.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-24 06:36:00 UTC

  • OK, I”ll say it. Merkel has done more damage to Europe than Napoleon, Hitler, an

    OK, I”ll say it. Merkel has done more damage to Europe than Napoleon, Hitler, and Stalin Combined. We can rebuild and breed. Pollution lasts


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-23 16:37:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/756891018012819457

  • Who has done more long term damage to Europe? Napoleon, Hitler, or Merkel? #tcot

    Who has done more long term damage to Europe? Napoleon, Hitler, or Merkel? #tcot #tlot #nrx #altright


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-23 16:31:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/756889597523664897