YOU CREATE LIBERTY WITHOUT PERMISSION You can beg for Liberty and at best receive permission. Or you can create Liberty without permission.
From one perspective, the Marxist-Socialists and the Ashkenazi Pseudoscientific Enlightenment combined with protestant feminists (less attractive women), catholics (the lower classes), blacks (the underclasses) created a successful series of revolts against the productive classes (military, legal, financial, entrepreneurial, agrarian), by co-opting media(selling consumer goods to all of their constituents), education (indoctrinating generations into the false narrative), and academy(selling false narratives to new constituents in exchange for economic rewards) in a successful attempt to overthrow our aryan(eugenic) experiment in formalizing contractualism (constitutional natural law) into a new civilization. From another, without this crisis would we have every discovered, written down, our reasons for excellence in the ancient and modern worlds? Have they not given us the excuse to finally formulate, articulate, document, and institutionalize our ancient traditions as a new world order – not just for ourselves, but for all mankind? If the liars can create three books of lies, then why cannot the truth-speakers create a book of truths? If lies can be spread by the sword, why cannot truths be spread by the contemporary weaponry? Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
From one perspective, the Marxist-Socialists and the Ashkenazi Pseudoscientific Enlightenment combined with protestant feminists (less attractive women), catholics (the lower classes), blacks (the underclasses) created a successful series of revolts against the productive classes (military, legal, financial, entrepreneurial, agrarian), by co-opting media(selling consumer goods to all of their constituents), education (indoctrinating generations into the false narrative), and academy(selling false narratives to new constituents in exchange for economic rewards) in a successful attempt to overthrow our aryan(eugenic) experiment in formalizing contractualism (constitutional natural law) into a new civilization. From another, without this crisis would we have every discovered, written down, our reasons for excellence in the ancient and modern worlds? Have they not given us the excuse to finally formulate, articulate, document, and institutionalize our ancient traditions as a new world order – not just for ourselves, but for all mankind? If the liars can create three books of lies, then why cannot the truth-speakers create a book of truths? If lies can be spread by the sword, why cannot truths be spread by the contemporary weaponry? Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
My political agenda is to devolve the empire, to constrain any federal government to defense, insurer or last resort, and interstate property conflict, and to liberate as many states to experiment in as many ways possible, creating lots of opportunity for ‘people at the top’. Let a thousand nations bloom.
My political agenda is to devolve the empire, to constrain any federal government to defense, insurer or last resort, and interstate property conflict, and to liberate as many states to experiment in as many ways possible, creating lots of opportunity for ‘people at the top’. Let a thousand nations bloom.
—Humans are adapted to want traditional forms of governance. They want law. They want to be ruled by legitimate, worthy, and trusted authority. They want a leader who commands the force of the nation to represent them to the outside world.”— Adolphus Völkermord Yes … and we want them because we want low opportunity costs (a dense population), low transaction costs (trust), low-cost information(homogeneity language, and interests), low-cost negotiation (stable norms: manners, ethics, morals), high returns on our work effort (a market and competitive commons), insurance against defection and defectors(law), and insurance against our failure (insurer of last resort), and insurance against the loss of all of the above (military defense).
—Humans are adapted to want traditional forms of governance. They want law. They want to be ruled by legitimate, worthy, and trusted authority. They want a leader who commands the force of the nation to represent them to the outside world.”— Adolphus Völkermord Yes … and we want them because we want low opportunity costs (a dense population), low transaction costs (trust), low-cost information(homogeneity language, and interests), low-cost negotiation (stable norms: manners, ethics, morals), high returns on our work effort (a market and competitive commons), insurance against defection and defectors(law), and insurance against our failure (insurer of last resort), and insurance against the loss of all of the above (military defense).
HE WAS WRONG: WAR IS NOT AN EXTENSION OF POLITICS
Clausewitz was pretty much wrong about everything. War is not an extension of politics. Politics is a means by which we limit war. It is not politics that is the basis of human interaction, but the ever present rational choice between war, conflict, boycott, cooperation, insurance, and kin-sacrifice. Political organizations exist to defend the interests of the group from competitors, and if possible convert the group to the most successful competitor, and therefore the competitor with the greatest discounts on negotiations with other groups. Politics is the extension of cooperation, and when politics fails, we return to the prior state – whatever is in our rational self-interest. But, as we are strong when organized against competitors, and weak when disorganized in the face of competitors, when political solutions fail, we merely choose politically organized conflict of large numbers rather than otherwise organized conflict of smaller numbers – thus allowing us to concentrate our full resources on the conflict in question.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-07 13:39:00 UTC
***I am not concerned with should, I am concerned with shall. Not in persuasion but compliance. Not in tolerance but in deportation. Not in compromise but in defeat. And should deportation fail, eradication by hanging, impaling, crosses and pyres.***
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-07 13:06:00 UTC
SOVEREIGNTY #tlot #tcot #nrx #altright #Conservatives https://t.co/pKxBzSur66
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-06 14:23:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/784036441487773696