Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Agreed. On the other hand, no more propagandism and deceit against ukraine, and

    Agreed. On the other hand, no more propagandism and deceit against ukraine, and no more threats against the west.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 12:09:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790525644056723456

    Reply addressees: @MelissaJaneSays @AdBen_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790278115364921344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790278115364921344

  • PROGRESSIVISM AS INSUFFICIENTLY DOMESTICATED HUMAN Progressives make moral argum

    PROGRESSIVISM AS INSUFFICIENTLY DOMESTICATED HUMAN

    Progressives make moral arguments for what they want, not whether, it’s true, truthful, a self-contradiction, produces consequences, or is even possible, or even vaguely rational. Because Progressives aren’t HUMAN. They’re just undomesticated animals reliant on instinct rather than reason. You cannot domesticate an animal without controlling its breeding over many generations. Until that domestication is accomplished, and people can cooperation by truth, reason, and what we now call science, then they are not domesticated, and they are not, Human. They may be of the Species homo-sapiens, but this is like saying a dog and a wolf are the same species. They are not. Nor are progressives. They are merely undomesticated animals.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 09:00:00 UTC

  • DEFINITION: A PROGRESSIVE – THE UNDOMESTICATED ANIMALS AMONG US. THOSE WITH WHOM

    DEFINITION: A PROGRESSIVE – THE UNDOMESTICATED ANIMALS AMONG US. THOSE WITH WHOM WE ARE AT WAR.

    A useful idiot with short-term time-preference, easily led by Cosmopolitans (instead of the church), into following a long sequence of incrementalisms, which result in the destruction of everything beyond the perception of their short time preference, and impervious to the perception, cognition, and accountability of the dysgenic devolution that they have produced, as little bait-followers of their much more cunning, and entirely evil, idiot-farmers.

    The world has been rebelling against the Heroic, Aristocratic Egalitarian Civilization, and our ongoing efforts at domestication of man, animal, nature, and the universe, since we invented it entirely for selfish reasons of profiteering by the domestication of man, just a we had from the domestication of the horse.

    The horse, like the pig, sheep, cow, chicken, men, and woman in particular, yearn to return to the selfish, impulsive, opportunistic wild where the burden of Truth, Planning, Reason, Cooperation, Production, Family, Industry, Commons and Nation are no longer a daily burden their short-term minds must bear.

    We are too Christian and insufficiently pagan when we assume that these people simply need education or incentives. They don’t. They’re genetically defective, still animals, not fully domesticated into rational humans. They have merely learned to ape our civilization’s truth as convenience, reason as propaganda, science as pseudoscience, while reaping its benefits, while watching the fence for an opportunity to run off with the contents of the garden.

    There was no Eden. By the hand of western man we cultivate it from the chaos. Eden is an ambition, not a memory.

    Progressivism is the dysgenic, devolutionary, re-wilding of man, undoing thousands of years of our progress, for the profitability of short-term consumption and increasing numbers, which pollute, exhaust, and uglify this garden we call Earth; and threaten to prohibit our extension of this garden to the stars.

    Those who are undomesticatable are not sufficiently human, that we should consider them untapped resources that might join our aristocracy and our multi-millennium quest to produce heaven versus merely longing for it.

    Morality is limited to those with whom we can cooperate. If we cannot cooperate we can ignore. If we cannot ignore we can enslave. if we cannot enslave we can kill. If we cannot kill we must defend. If we defend we simply accumulate technology and resources until we can return to ignoring, enslaving, and killing.

    The universe will not give us many chances to repeat each era. Geological time is not kind to us. There are as yet no other voices in the darkness. If we are to become the gods we seek over the garden we seek, then we cannot fall to the barbarians – even our own women – once again. as we have in the past.

    We confused our technological success in the modern era with our success at escaping the most constant threat that we have always faced: the invasion and conquest by the beast that is undomesticated man. Where we did not confuse our condition with success, we rested on our laurels, and bribed the animals with trinkets like literacy, and science, and medicine, and rule of law. But this did not domesticate them. They were not prisoners of poor governors, but undomesticated animals, who having, like locusts, consumed without payment, the goods we have made. Did not adapt to the conditions under which those goods were manufactured: self-domestication.

    We can profit from markets and open trade, we can profit from markets and closed trade, we can profit from markets by technological secrecy and innovation, we can profit from the market for governance by conquest and colonization and domestication, or we can profit by conquest, death, and the taking of property and territory.

    The only advantage to profiting from markets and open trade is that we take less risk at the cost of becoming obese and ill from overconsumption, rather than profiting from colonization, or conquest is risk and reward, and clearly we UNDERESTIMATED our low risk: the risk in same in both cases by different means.

    We have spent a century now with the experiment of non-domestication of man and woman and it has given us domestic socialism, world communism, world Islamism, and the near destruction of our families, culture, civilization followed by the near genocide of our tribes.

    We cannot reap the rewards of domestication – a high trust society with rapid innovation, production, and consumption – by failing to defeat the Red Queen of undomesticated humans.

    We always pick the wrong allies. The Chinese and the Russians are Our only friends. Why? Because they do not surrender, ever, the hard work of domesticating animals, whether forieng, domestic, of female.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 08:54:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT: THEY’RE NOT FAMILY, FRIENDS, ALLIES, OR POTENTIAL ANYTHING OTHER THAN

    THE LEFT: THEY’RE NOT FAMILY, FRIENDS, ALLIES, OR POTENTIAL ANYTHING OTHER THAN CUSTOMERS – THEY’RE ENEMIES

    —“Start a fucking war with Russia? How stupid are these people?”—

    It’s not that they’re stupid. It’s that they’re enemies and we are only now just giving up hope they will join us. (kill them all.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 08:14:00 UTC

  • CULTURAL MARXISM=RALLYING AND SHAMING THE WEST) – Race (Whites vs non-Whites) –

    CULTURAL MARXISM=RALLYING AND SHAMING THE WEST)

    – Race (Whites vs non-Whites)

    – Culture (Western vs non-Western)

    – Family (Nuclear family vs extended family)

    – Religion (Christianity vs Pseudoscience)

    – Gender (Men vs Women)

    – Sexual orientation (Heterosexual vs LGBT)

    – State (Nationalism vs Globalism)

    – Morality (Eugenic vs Dysgenic)

    Aristo Domestication’s Defense vs Prole Decivilization’s Defense.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 07:59:00 UTC

  • vs Right: Root Conflict

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsTyfPrUlOELeft vs Right: Root Conflict


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 05:56:00 UTC

  • TRUMP’S MISSION “THE RESTORATION” “1 – restore prosperity to our country, 2 – re

    TRUMP’S MISSION “THE RESTORATION”

    “1 – restore prosperity to our country,

    2 – restore secure our communities, and

    3 – restore honesty to our government.”

    AWESOME!!!!!!!!


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-23 17:01:00 UTC

  • TRUMP PRODUCERS / CLINTON PARASITES TRUMP Trump does better than Clinton among m

    TRUMP PRODUCERS / CLINTON PARASITES

    TRUMP

    Trump does better than Clinton among men (48% to 34%), lower-income voters (48% to 35%), rural voters (60% to 22%), and those who express a religion.

    CLINTON

    Clinton beats Trump with women (46% to 38%), voters ages 18-44 (41% to 34%), the wealthy (47% to 38%), and investors (48% to 38%).


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-23 16:59:00 UTC

  • BUTCH HAS FRESH MEAT IN THE KITCHEN 🙂 (New Podcast Soon) So Butch, Eli, and I r

    BUTCH HAS FRESH MEAT IN THE KITCHEN 🙂

    (New Podcast Soon)

    So Butch, Eli, and I recorded a podcast today on Discretionary (traditional dictatorial) Fascism, and on Market (Rule of Law) Fascism.

    And I swear we distilled the entire spectrum of political theory into just two hours – actually 40 minutes and the rest was color. And I’ll bet you’ll need to listen to it two or three times to grok it all.

    It was awesome.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-23 14:37:00 UTC

  • THE TRUTH ABOUT UKRAINE, RUSSIA, AND THE WEST (important – unification of the ci

    THE TRUTH ABOUT UKRAINE, RUSSIA, AND THE WEST

    (important – unification of the circumpolar people)

    —“Soros, the CIA, Europeans, etc) funded Maidan, something the nationalists like to forget.”— (A Friend)

    Um. Yeah. Soros needs to be killed or imprisoned and his assets seized and returned to the Bank of England.

    But then while he invested in Ukraine. So did the USA. So did every bordering country. And Russia heavily invested in Ukraine as well – although at competing purposes.

    More importantly, so did most of the oligarchs out of self-defense under the (correct belief) that the then-president, by rejecting European membership, was close enough to Moscow, and had so successfully impoverished the military, the reunification with Russia at the expense of the oligarchs was in the near future, and would lead to government’s power to TAKE from them, rather than a unification with Europe which would make more of them even richer, and require governments NEGOTIATE with them.

    And while I realize I am better informed, and have a greater understanding of the circumstances, it does not take a rocket scientist with a great deal of knowledge to grasp that the people who organized Maidan and put Poroshenko in power were the Oligarchs, and that the foreign investment merely provided them with a discount and political cover.

    Everyone even vaguely connected to every intelligence service, or their private sector NGO’s, or those of us who have understanding of both know this. But *ALL* the media organizations in Ukraine, (just like the USA) are controlled by the Oligarchs. And worse, MORAL NARRATIVES are appealing to eastern Europeans even more so than they are appealing to western Europeans – they are a less empirical people.

    The People Of Ukraine wanted European Membership like their Polish Cousins and Neighbors. The only people who didn’t were a minority in the east whose incomes were dependent upon the remnants of the Russian military manufacturing sector, the miners who and pensioners who would receive greater redistributions from Moscow than kiev, and the (dominant faction) of gangsters in Russified Donbas basin, who understood the impact of European integration on their organized crime, and the families, friends, and business dependents in Crimea where the large Russian military presence drove the economy.

    You can tell a Russian argument simply by the fact that he will posit a false moral equivalency rather than an economic interest.

    I know this technique is as endemic to Russian culture as it is to Jewish. But as an anglo empiricist I am immune. Everyone acts in the material (economic) and therefore reproductive interests in matters political. So we anglos argue in long-term incentives in favor of individual family, and collective gains and losses, not moralisms in favor of collectivist and short-term moral equivalency.

    Putin says the difference between Russia and the west less precisely but makes the same point. The difference is that Russians feel vulnerable and ‘behind’, and so they favor the collective at all times, and argue moral equivalency to justify it. Wealthy westerners are not insecure so they argue empirically for the interests of individuals and families. Westerners argue empirically and security for a luxury, while Russians argue justificationally out of vulnerability and insecurity.

    It would be better if we both argued truthfully, trying to make Russia secure, and the west less suicidal and more interested in defending our civilization via the collective and family than the luxury of the interests of the individual over the family, tribe, nation, and civilization.

    The answer is out there in front of us. We must have the knowledge to understand it, and the courage to work together to solve it.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of (The West) Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-23 10:52:00 UTC