Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OU

    OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OUR FAULT FOR BEING OUT-GUNNED BY IT. ESPECIALLY BY THEIR ALLIANCE WITH OUR WOMEN AND PURITANS.

    There is blame for everyone in the enlightenment – perhaps the jews and French the most. As I say, don’t blame the innovator in warfare, blame those who are losign from not developing superior countermeasures because of underinvestment in weaponry.

    —“Ezra Pound had many clever ideas, but his faulting “Big Jew” was not one of them.”— Boris Miroslav Spacek

    He was correct that the cosmopolitans were the originators of the second ‘religious’ conquest of the west, this time by pseudoscience rather than by authoritarian mysticism.

    We have Aesop, Homer, Alexander, Aristotle, Aurelius, Machiavelli, Bacon, Locke, Smith, Hume, Jefferson, Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer, Menger, Nietzche, Hayek, and all those in between.

    But the cosmopolitans reacted to them with the Pseudoscientific Counter-Enlightenment: Boaz (anthropology), Freud (psychology), Marx (economics and sociology), Cantor(mathematical platonism), Mises (economic pseudoscience), Adorno/Frankfurt( anti-aristocratic aesthetics), Rand and Rothbard (anti-commons).

    And sold the pseudoscience to the female and underclass populace as a utopian scheme via the academy for profit, just as the mysticism was sold to the female and underclass via traveling preachers for profit: to rebel against the aristocracy that domesticated them out of ignorance, mysticism, tribalism, and poverty.

    So this is all merely a fact of history now, and the consequences of the first great lie: authoritarian mysticism, and the second great lie of critical pseudoscience are empirically observable as the destruction of common capital in all its forms.

    So no, he was not wrong.

    What he was wrong about, and what all subsequent generations have been wrong about, is that when one is confronted by an act of warfare wether by arms, by immigration(displacement), by economics, by conversion, or by information (falsehood), that one can be out-gunned-out-germed-out-steeled by immigration, economics, conversion, or informational propaganda as well as by force of arms.

    So that the failure to adapt to a new form of warfare is OUR FAULT, rather than the fault of the innovators of the new form of warfare.

    And this is not complicated.

    We have built western civilization into the FASTEST evolving civilization by the domestication of humans under our domain, through nothing more than the use of the common, natural, judge-discovered law, and the use of truth, empiricism, reason, arms and technology despite small numbers to do so. And we have dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of mysticism, ignorance, poverty, and starvation, and disease with those tools – and we profited from it. And there is no shame in that profiting.

    Compare the consequences of the use of western truth to domesticate man, and the consequences of the first reaction to aristocracy (scriptural religion), the second reaction to Aristotelian aristocracy (scriptural monotheism), and the third reaction to Baconian empiricism (pseudoscientific cosmopolitanism).

    Are jews responsible for the second and third great lies and the harm that they have done? Of course they are.

    Are we responsible for not yet advancing our law so that such lies are impossible to propagate through as aggressive punishment of that method of war and crime as every other method of war and crime?

    Yes, we are.

    So the jews are certainly to blame for much of the world’s reliance on the great lies, and the conflicts therefrom. But we are responsible for tolerating the great lies.

    The interesting question is… why are we tolerant of the great lies, either supernatural great lies, or pseudoscientific great lies?

    And why is it that the jews have learned to specialize in ‘the big lies’ as the Russians and Germans have so frequently observed?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 09:26:00 UTC

  • POLITY FAILURE IS DETERMINISTIC (james agustus berens) —“Monopoly rule via maj

    POLITY FAILURE IS DETERMINISTIC

    (james agustus berens)

    —“Monopoly rule via majoritarian democracy:

    (1) monopoly rule makes market calculation impossible,

    (2) majoritarian democracy makes lying necessary.

    (1)+(2) makes polity failure deterministic.”

    —James Augustus Berens


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 18:51:00 UTC

  • “DEMOCRACY HAS IT’S OWN CALCULATION PROBLEM” (by Jeremie Makell) —“Natural law

    “DEMOCRACY HAS IT’S OWN CALCULATION PROBLEM”

    (by Jeremie Makell)

    —“Natural law informs how we choose to cooperate to establish and maintain sovereignty. Some backwoods libertine can stake a plot of land and proclaim himself sovereign, but that’s not sovereignty, that’s just LARPing.

    Sovereignty requires that we cooperate to insure each others’ property from imposition. As we develop new technologies (bronze, iron, etc.) the complexity of our social institutions must evolve as well.

    For every new advancement also creates more opportunity for parasitism and externalities that increase overall transaction costs while reducing trust. The more rigorous your institutions the more adaptable you are to inter-generational change.

    This explains why China despite being an ancient civilization, had centuries of stagnation while the Europeans were innovators and drove forward industry.

    Each of the markets that Curt lists (rule, commons, reproduction, production, etc.) become more prevalent and necessary the further civilization advances.

    This is what I believe Curt means when he refers to DECIDABILITY: just as prices aid us in determining how to most efficiently buy and sell goods, the exchanges conducted voluntarily between markets under rule of law help us to determine how to most efficiently advance civilization.

    Democracy fails to adapt to change because it has its own calculation problem.”– Jeremie Makell

    (ed.: So perfect, so eloquent, I want to weep with joy. — Curt)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:49:00 UTC

  • “Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and

    —“Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and emotional blackmail first,and the barrel of a gun later. In the closed nationstate model of the 20th century it was used to shift blocks of capital to different competing institutions. In a global neoliberal anarchic sense it’s used to loot dying nation states and transfer wealth to global oligarchic power confederacies. We must (temporarily?) embrace nationalism not necessarily along moral lines (nationalism has become a form of nostalgic romanticism that is fun obviously) but as “firewalls” against nomadic oligarchs looting and robbing and destroying our crumbling cultural and and bureaucratic institutions.”— Murray Sell


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:21:00 UTC

  • NO GOVERNMENT REGISTRATION NEEDED The Restoration: Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and

    NO GOVERNMENT REGISTRATION NEEDED

    The Restoration: Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and Pyre

    —“No Government registration needed….just need yo train yourself how to use them effectively.”— Rolf Shiner


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 12:46:00 UTC

  • WHY DO WE NOT TEACH THE CIVIC LOGICS? SO THAT THE STATE CAN LIE, CHEAT, STEAL, A

    WHY DO WE NOT TEACH THE CIVIC LOGICS? SO THAT THE STATE CAN LIE, CHEAT, STEAL, AND MANUFACTURE IGNORANCE.

    In programming we learn the very great difference between the communication of meaning and the communication of truth.

    This is why programming is as necessary a skill as reading, mathematics, and basic logic.

    And it’s why numbers, money, accounting, and property are as important as vocabulary and grammar, the periodic table, or the list of subatomic particles.

    Now you have to ask yourself: Why we teach everything else, but the set of logic, grammar, rhetoric, and history, and the set of money, accounting, property, and economics in our schools?

    We know the answer.

    Because it provides children, and youth with the ability to make uncomfortable judgments by which to question the propaganda of their teachers, their professors, their public intellectuals, and their government.

    Because, an ignorant adult public can be farmed, and an empirical and meritocratic civilization destroyed, by a government of lies, justifying its self-interest via pseudoscience, propaganda, and fraud.

    We will restore truth and testimony in education just as severely as any other part of the commons.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Religion of the West

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 11:23:00 UTC

  • The Restoration: Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and Pyre

    The Restoration: Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and Pyre


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 10:57:00 UTC

  • NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK ON PARASITISM (LEFTISM) Never, Never, Never, Never, N

    NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK ON PARASITISM (LEFTISM)

    Never, Never, Never, Never, Never.

    If you encounter ridicule, shaming, rallying, shouting-down, or propagandism to obscure an attempt at circumvention of voluntary exchange and to force or justify parasitic extraction, then hit first and instruct later.

    If you encounter free riding on commons, avoidance of maintenance of the commons, socialization of losses into the commons, privatization of commons, damage to the commons, conspiracy to free ride, avoid, socialize, privatize, or damage the commons, or act of war against the commons by violence, immigration, trade policy, religious conversion, or informational warfare – then strike first and instruct later.

    NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK.

    Instead, PROSECUTE the slightest imposition upon the commons.

    This is the most important cost you pay for living in the Eden we had made.

    Every property owner a juror, sheriff, a judge, a warrior. That is the price of Property In Toto: constant diligence.

    And those that do not pay that cost of constant diligence are merely parasites upon the commons that those who defend it have made.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 10:53:00 UTC