Apparently (Thankfully) I don’t make the Alt Right Hit List.
I’ll stick with aristocracy, and universal nationalism thanks. Let’s save every family, tribe, nation and race from The Jewish-Puritan Pseudoscientific Religion. Saving our own does not exclude saving all the others too.
#NewRight.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 13:23:00 UTC
We have to be honest with ourselves, just as were the Spartans, and accept that if we let the Helots or the women participate in the franchise they will revert to barbarism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 12:37:00 UTC
IN PRAISE OF TAXES 😉
(rulership is a profession, and one we must return to)
Assuming that taxes are used for the purpose of the creation and defense of the full spectrum of markets. And assuming we have juridical defense against taxes not used in creation and defense of those markets. And assuming that tax competition exists by freedom of exit and absence of collusion. And assuming one of the markets constructed is a market for commons. Then taxes are merely a commission on the use of violence to construct markets that enforce production and deny parasitism.
In other words, the Aristocracy may profit via commissions on the construction, maintenance, and defense of markets just like the provider of any other form of good, service, or information.
In fact, the wealth created by profits from the construction, maintenance and defense of markets, is possibly the most morally defensible form of profit a man, family, and clan, tribe, and race can demonstrate.
So again, the libertarians, classical liberals, and progressive liberals, and Marxist socialist have been wrong. While the liberation from the mysticism of the church by the scientific enlightenment has been a boon for man, the attempts by the various other classes to create monopolies favoring their classes rather than markets for the cooperation between the classes, has been predicated on moral falsehoods, pseudoscience, and outright lies.
Like the Spartans, Athenians, Romans, Germans, French, we must rule for our betterment and the betterment of man, or be ruled against our interests, and against the interests of man.
Not only should we tax. We should revel in our taxes. We should maximize the returns on our shares. And continue to profit from the incremental domestication and eventual transcendence of man.
We were mistaken. We need NO OTHER CAREER than rule. Rule and fee for rule, by commission on successful rule, is perhaps the greatest of our achievements, and a means by which we have, can, and shall profit.
What must we do to return to rule?
Restore Rule of Natural Law (Science)
Restore the Judiciary. (Rule of Law)
Restore the Monarchy. (Judge of last resort)
Restore the Nobility (Governors)
Restore the Knights (Regiments)
Restore the Sheriffs. (Police)
Restore the Militia (disaster, emergency, war)
Restore the Artisans (artists and craftsmen)
Restore the Laborers (of the commons)
Restore the market for marriage
Restore the market for commons
Restore the market for rule.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 12:29:00 UTC
TO RULE ARISTOCRATICALLY IS TO LIMIT NOT TO DIRECT. WE MUST RULE, OR BE RULED. WE FORGOT. WE ARE MEN. WE MUST RULE.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 14:57:00 UTC
Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY
—“What are the features that distinguish aristocracy and oligarchy?”— William Butchman
An aristocracy preserves a judge of last resort (monarch).
You can kill a monarch and change the judge of last resort.
It is much harder to kill an oligarchy (group).
It is much harder to kill a government (larger group)
it is much harder to kill a bureaucracy ( larger group )
An oligarchy subverts the market (rule of law) by use of:
– Force
– Gossip
– Capital
The defense against an oligarchy is a judiciary that rules by productive fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externalities.
Most oligarchies persist only because they violate one or more of the provisions of natural law. Most commonly: productivity.
In other words competition in the market and prosecution in court are EQUALLY necessary methods of preserving sovereignty by the suppression of parasitism, and the demand for sovereign transfer, in a market for opportunities, rather than in a market for rents, where the market for opportunities is made possible by nothing more than an increase in population density and an increase in the suppression of parasitism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 14:34:00 UTC
—“Aristocracy creates sovereignty*: the prevention of monopoly by the enforcement of markets.”— James Augustus Berens
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 13:44:00 UTC
THE BOURGEOISE SOCIETY HAS BEEN A CATASTROPHE.
There is a vast difference between the scientific enlightenment which was a tremendous success, and the classical liberal seizure of political power through the various revolutions against the aristocracy and the monarchies.
Yes we can blame the aristocracy from failing to evolve the organization of the state and incorporate the bourgeoisie. And yes we can blame the bourgeoisie for failing by incorporating the proletariat and women into the house of commons.
But in the present, of the Marxist proletariat(worldwide), the classical liberal bourgeoisie, the ‘liberal’ priesthood (20th century), and the martial aristocracy(antiquity to 1800), all have failed except the martial aristocracy. And more frighteningly, they have failed quickly, and in succession.
The aristocracy created markets in every aspect of life: freedom, marriage, commerce, commons, dispute resolution, and rule. But failed to abandon their rents and accommodate the finance and merchant class when commerce rather than agrarian territory evolved to the central source of production.
The classical liberal bourgeoisie tried to make the market everything, at the expense of the tribe. They tried to create a monopoly of the entrepreneurial classes. And they failed. They destroyed the family and community as a unit of production. They brought people to capital rather than capital to people. Even if the primary beneficiaries of their financial order were the common people’
The Marxists proletarians resisted the bourgeoise’s impact on home and family – and committed the greatest crimes in human history by trying to take over rule from the bourgeoisie. They tried to create a monopoly of the laboring classes. And they failed. They destroyed entire nations, tribes, families, economies and traditions. Worst of all they destroyed all trust.
The secular priesthood we call ‘liberals’ or ‘the cathedral’ tried to take over from the Marxists, in pursuit of a global secular religion consisting of utopian promises, pseudoscience, and faith in the persistent expansion of technology – and destroyed the entirety of western civilization in less than a century.
They tried to create a monopoly of the secular priestly caste. And they failed. They failed because they treated as equal in potential and demand people who are not. As the classical liberals destroyed the family as a unit of production, the liberals destroyed the nation as a unit of production.
But only the martial aristocracy forced the creation of markets in everything by the total prohibition of monopoly – even a monopoly of rule – by resisting all unification and federalization until Napoleon used fiat credit to create ‘total war’ and forced them to relent out of defense.
Only the monarchy created markets for the voluntary production, distribution, and exchange of goods, services, information, and commons, between the classes.
And only the aristocracy understood that each class’ attempt to create monopolies would lead to a breakdown of the cooperation between the ‘estates of the realm’ – what we call today ‘the social classes’.
Aristocracy creates a monopoly: the prevention of monopoly by the enforcement of markets.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 12:52:00 UTC
NEWBIES: GET IT YET? WE ARE CHANGING THE QUALITY OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE – FOREVER.
Every person, with every minor improvement in making his propertarian arguments, is helping to raise the bar of political argument, and to overthrow millennia of nonsense, falsehood, pseudoscience, and lies.
The purpose of the Propertarian project was to give us a ratio-scientific language for the discussion, comparison, and debate of ethical, moral, political, and group evolutionary strategies.
My goal was to collect 5-10 that could do it well, and 100 that could do it at all.
That, and a Book, a “canon”, is all it will take for us to change the world as much as empiricism changed the world.
And with that argumentative weaponry, and a set of demands, we will force a revolution on this world equal to the greek and the anglo – even if we must do so at the end of a gun, the tip of a spear, the heat of flame,
We are doing something very important.
We have the next best chance to complete the Germanic Project, and restore our civilization to its original path: transcendence into the gods we seek, through the continuous improvement of man.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 10:50:00 UTC
WE ARE MEN. WE LIMIT. WE RULE. WE MUST ACT LIKE IT.
RULE OR BE RULED.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 10:04:00 UTC
RT @BulgakovsPilot: “We fight rather to keep something alive than in the expectation that it will triumph.” #NewRight https://t.co/RZEUJWVf…
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 18:40:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799321333544919040