Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • I am not fond of regulations that create black-markets. I’m fond of preventing v

    I am not fond of regulations that create black-markets. I’m fond of preventing visibility in the commons. if distributing drugs is legal but a hand-craft industry between individuals, and there is no externality produced by it then that’s one thing. But what one must understand is that there is a difference between a vacation, medication, and mental-exit. We can all tolerate vacations (celebrations), and some of us need frequent medications. But if at any point one is exiting the use of reason, then one is exiting the constract of cooperation. And if you exit the contract of cooperation by forgoing reason, and you cause externalities, you have returned to animal state, and like any animal you are merely a pest that needs to be exterminated.

    In my opinion, this is the correct method of addressing the problem of drugs (and ideas) that affect one’s reason (and pleasure sensors).

    if you are human, and can participate in reciprocity then you are a candidate for cooperation, and not a burden on others. Otherwise you’re just an animal that may at times be capable of cooperation, and other times not. And as an animal rather than a human you can easily be exterminated like any other pest.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 13:58:00 UTC

  • WE TURN TO VIOLENCE —“Liberty is not an inherent right, it is a prestigious re

    WE TURN TO VIOLENCE

    —“Liberty is not an inherent right, it is a prestigious responsibility – some are not capable of handling or even desiring living in a country where freedom is the answer. When liberty is not the answer, where else shall we turn?”— Wayne Lawrence

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 13:50:00 UTC

  • Josh: I think maybe this is the difference between our perceptions: I favor the

    Josh: I think maybe this is the difference between our perceptions: I favor the cost of institutional solutions that produce incentives by self interest that make the cost of providing the high cost of violence unnecessary. Because while violence alters immediacy, the cost of diligence and the distraction of shocks means the incentive to retaliate against you remains. Yet if institutions exist at all times and cause people to monitor each other, vastly more dramatic shocks are necessary to cause a change in state, and when you are otherwise occupied you do not leave an opening for retaliation and change in state.

    I express this sometimes as the difference between strategy and tactics. But perhaps I needed to say this in terms of costs and opportunities.

    If men(or women) are incapable of sovereignty, then maturing them into freemen by the use of institutions is merely cheaper, more competitive, more rewarding, and safer than the alternatives.

    This is nothing except a statement of the cost of domesticating animals.

    The Spartans were never as safe as the Romans. The Romans over extended. But the Spartans couldn’t even extend.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 13:46:00 UTC

  • People would be surprised at how dangerous many of our advocates are. Nice, smar

    People would be surprised at how dangerous many of our advocates are. Nice, smart, handsome, fit, normal men. No problem ‘doing what’s necessary’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-22 18:04:00 UTC

  • RT @JimmyTrussels: @jordanbpeterson @curtdoolittle incremental mastery of truth

    RT @JimmyTrussels: @jordanbpeterson @curtdoolittle incremental mastery of truth telling as a coop/ruling tech for federated warriors -> Wes…

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-22 13:07:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/823155023081250817

  • THE REALM Warriors want Sovereignty. Bourgoise want Liberty. Craftsmen want Free

    THE REALM

    Warriors want Sovereignty.

    Bourgoise want Liberty.

    Craftsmen want Freedom

    The Rest want Subsidy.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-22 10:53:00 UTC

  • YOU CAN LOVE AND RESPECT THE MORAL BUT MALINVESTED. BUT IN THE END, THERE IS ONL

    YOU CAN LOVE AND RESPECT THE MORAL BUT MALINVESTED. BUT IN THE END, THERE IS ONLY ONE METHOD OF OBTAINING SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, AND SUBSIDY.

    1) People who don’t LIKE Jeff Tucker have no soul. He’s eminently likable, charming, intelligent and admirable.

    2) People who AGREE with Tucker’s prescription for order are profoundly hopeful in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary

    3) People who ARGUE for left libertinism as does Tucker suffer from both ignorance and arrested development.

    4) People who Like Tucker, Empathize with his hopefulness, but have Matured because of the evidence, argue AGAINST Tucker (and all left libertines).

    5) People who argue against left libertines either fall back on HISTORICAL (Reactionary) means of argument (Fascism), or argue forward on EVOLVING the european SOVEREIGN order by incrementally increasing suppression of social, economic, and political parasitism, via the natural, common, judge discovered law. Because by incremental suppression of innovations in the means of parasitism, we force people back in to the markets for cooperation: the market for association, market for reproduction(marriage), market for production of goods, services, and information, market for the production of commons, and the market for the productions of polities that vary in the commons that they produce – since different groups, due to distributions of abilities, require different commons.

    6) This EVOLUTIONARY means of expanding the suite of markets through denial of parasitism, by the incremental (evolutionary) means of suppression, using natural, judge discovered, common law, refers to NATURAL LAW NOMOCRACY: Rule by Natural Law of Sovereign Men.

    INTERMISSION

    One obtains sovereignty in FACT by the exchange of the contract of sovereignty with ever-increasing numbers. One obtains liberty by purchase (permission) from the sovereigns because one is unwilling or unable to pay the cost of sovereignty in fact. One obtains freedom (permission) from the sovereign and the liberated, by the promise of maintaining one’s productivity without parasitism. One obtains redistribution(dependence) from the sovereign, the liberated, and the free, by the promise of non-interference and the promise of maintenance of the territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, and normative commons. In other words, people are paid to maintain the commons in exchange for access to the market, and dividends from the market.

    7) One obtains Sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or redistribution(dependence) by the following means:

    a) Denying falsehoods the informational and argumentative field, through falsification and if necessary prosecution.

    b) Advocating for Sovereignty, liberty, freedom and subsidy (redistribution) under the natural, judge discovered, common law, and the creation of markets for the production of all cooperative goods: association, reproduction, production of goods, services and information, and the production of commons, and the production of polities that produce commons necessary for tribes, families, and nations with similar needs.

    c) Paying the price of Sovereignty (violence and the fee of risk), liberty (law and fees), freedom (policing and fees), subsidy (maintenance and fees).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-22 10:50:00 UTC

  • I suppose that it never occurs to ‘liberals’ that the cost of not conquering, en

    I suppose that it never occurs to ‘liberals’ that the cost of not conquering, enslaving, or killing them is one we pay every day.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-21 15:28:00 UTC

  • #Trump #TrumpInauguration Who spent more money trying to influence US elections?

    #Trump #TrumpInauguration Who spent more money trying to influence US elections? Russia, or George Soros? …. Soros obviously.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-20 00:30:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/822239835092058113

  • #Trump #TrumpInauguration Who spent more money trying to influence US elections?

    #Trump #TrumpInauguration Who spent more money trying to influence US elections? Russia, or George Soros? …. Soros obviously.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-19 19:30:00 UTC