Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • I ADVOCATE NATIONALISM, AND THE DEFENSE OF THE CIRCUMPOLAR PEOPLE. SO I DONT LIK

    I ADVOCATE NATIONALISM, AND THE DEFENSE OF THE CIRCUMPOLAR PEOPLE. SO I DONT LIKE TO DIS ON RUSSIANS.

    I have been making the Circumpolar argument for a few years now, and the only holdouts are Russians. And they are holdouts for self imposed red-headed-stepchild reasons: internal myths.

    But please don’t put me in a position where I have to dis on Russia Culture. I love russians, and I think american and russian males have more in common than any other two peoples. I envy much of russian life, I just don’t envy what I see as unnecessary relative poverty, and our politician’s inabilty to allow us to use that similarity for mutual gain. I love Ukraine, but want to see her join Poland in european prosperity. And I want the baltics to return to freedom from the crimes the russians imposed upon them. I hate american policy with a passion, and I would exterminate every individual in the federal bureaucracy without remorse – and with celebratory joy. But I also understand that the american deep state evolved and exists to prevent another world war, by forcing states to develop mature economies, secular laws, and aristotelian (secular) science, and to remain within their borders, so that we never have another world war.

    But while we have achieved the defeat of world communism, which was an economic model. We have lost the battle of cultural marxism. And we are being attacked now by the OPPOSITE of everything we aspire to: islam: dysgenic reproduction, economic recidivism, superstitious laws, and anti-science. All of which suit the needs of the vast underclass of the steppe and desert, but threaten the vast middle class of the forest, river, and plain.

    We have reciprocally compatible ideologies both founded on Aryanism. The old german was the best of these ideologies, with anglos the most optimistic, the germans the most realistic, and the russian most pessimistic, for purely territorial reasons. Why can’t we unify on our Aryanism (rule by domestication) and understand our divisions of labor? At present this is because we all continue to beleive our falsehoods. Americans have done no good against islam becuase it is an underclass not middle class civilization. Russians have been right about muslims, mongols, and chinese principly because they must combat them. there is no mediterranean, north sea, or atlantic that protects russia. She must be more ‘on alert’ than the rest of the ‘white’ peoples. Just as the germans had to be more ‘alert’ than the anglo sea faring peoples.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 10:32:00 UTC

  • FASCISM, COMMUNISM, MONARCHY – ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ‘BAD’. to: Robby Daniel Dyer

    FASCISM, COMMUNISM, MONARCHY – ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ‘BAD’.

    to: Robby Daniel Dyer

    I don’t have the time this morning to correct you in detail,

    BUT since you’re a smart enough fellow I’ll give you these points to ponder:

    An unlimited market system allows endemic parasitism others and the commons by externality and this is why it never has or will exist – people won’t tolerate it.

    When you say ‘authoritarian’ rule you mean DISCRETIONARY rule. However, rule of law removes discretion by empirical evolution.

    Under rule of law, under natural law, (non-discretionary rule) a monarch merely functions as a judge of last resort, when the subject under consideration is not one of law but long term consequence.

    A monarchy that collects administrative fees (sales taxes or land rent taxes) on the market it administers (polity), may spend that income however it prefers, and in history, it has been small, and they tend to spend it reasonably well. Because otherwise, as individuals, they are open to assassination – usually by their own family members for threatening their social status.

    So while fascism requires discretionary rule, it remains a viable strategy for the conduct of Total War – which was the reason it was invented: to preserve napoleon’s invention of total war, and apply it to the industrial era.

    While communism requires discretionary rule, it also lacks an incentive structure necessary for a voluntary organization of production, so it requires a vast directorial class.

    So when you include monarchy in that list I am not sure what you are talking about. Because christian monarchy dependend eitehr on the common traditional law, or later natural law, or something in between – the restored roman law. No monarch had full license, and the church mandated that fact – and if one’s rule was ‘uninsured’ by the church it meant it was ‘for sale to all commers’ with license.

    As far as I know ‘perfect government’ consists of natural law, independent judiciary (the west’s original priesthood), a military militia, a hereditary monarchy, a market for commons consisting of multiple houses, a market for the production of goods, services, and information, a market for reproduction (marriage), a market for association.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 08:50:00 UTC

  • We are all that stand between profiting from the enslavement of the undomesticat

    We are all that stand between profiting from the enslavement of the undomesticated human animals.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-21 00:50:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/833841373174439936

    Reply addressees: @Realistic_Right

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/833825965713166336


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Realistic_Right

    I was telling my wife this last night. The whole world is arrayed against middle class white people. The brown hordes & elite want us dead. https://t.co/BF7Hc9oNMo

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/833825965713166336

  • #Conservative #Libertarian #Trump #NewRight

    #Conservative #Libertarian #Trump #NewRight https://t.co/jeWAbPxcgS


    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-20 19:37:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/833762594703933440

  • Direct Economic (Empirical) Democracy

    DIRECT ECONOMIC (EMPIRICAL) DEMOCRACY When we say democracy we could be referring to the use of votes for very different purposes. We could be using them to select representatives. We could be using them to choose preferred commons.  We could be using them to select preferred behavior. We could be using them to punish impermissible behavior. I see no case at all for representatives in an era of cheap mass communications.  If we are to use representatives at all, they should be chosen by lot for a single year, and held accountable for their actions by rule of law like any other contract maker. As far as I can tell, direct economic democracy either by proportion or by equal share, where one’s votes may NOT be proxied, will produce (a) the most educated and aware population, and (b) the least corrupt government, as long as (c) all statements must be ‘scientifically’ truthful by the terms i’ve defined elsewhere.

    The dominance of single houses independent of classes the dominance of parties, the use of representatives, and the cheapness of lobbying representatives rather than the voters, are all malincentives.
  • Direct Economic (Empirical) Democracy

    DIRECT ECONOMIC (EMPIRICAL) DEMOCRACY When we say democracy we could be referring to the use of votes for very different purposes. We could be using them to select representatives. We could be using them to choose preferred commons.  We could be using them to select preferred behavior. We could be using them to punish impermissible behavior. I see no case at all for representatives in an era of cheap mass communications.  If we are to use representatives at all, they should be chosen by lot for a single year, and held accountable for their actions by rule of law like any other contract maker. As far as I can tell, direct economic democracy either by proportion or by equal share, where one’s votes may NOT be proxied, will produce (a) the most educated and aware population, and (b) the least corrupt government, as long as (c) all statements must be ‘scientifically’ truthful by the terms i’ve defined elsewhere.

    The dominance of single houses independent of classes the dominance of parties, the use of representatives, and the cheapness of lobbying representatives rather than the voters, are all malincentives.
  • Yes, Fascism is an Exceptional Extension of Total War

    YES FASCISM IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL OF WAR (read this or remain stupid) —“Curt, would you still say fascism possesses a useful albeit temporary function?”—Robert Harris Scott Hayes

    Fascism has an EXCEPTIONAL short term function. It is a means of marshaling every resource in a nation for war on all fronts: military, trade, economic, financial, cultural, religious and informational. But it’s as costly as war over the long term. It is a means of warfare. Just as an army is an authoritarian means of organizing a people for physical war, and investing in certain commercial sectors is a means of organizing people for trade and economic war, and organizing credit for financial war….. Fascism allows us even to organize INFORMATION for the purpose of warfare. And that is what the Fascist generation did. War is war. But we do not fight the last battle just because we understand the tactic. Today we have a different tactic. We have a very very very fragile civilization that has been at war for a century or more with the cosmopolitan financial vision of managing the world for their benefit rather than each nation using financial, legal, cultural, and informational institutions to advance each nation WITHOUT exporting capital to others – by PREVENTING the parasitism of the cosmopolitan order we live under. Fascism isn’t necessary because fascism is DISCRETIONARY. We can do the SAME THING without putting a dictator in charge. We can simply starve out the other side by cutting off their means of funding. 1) direct redistribution of fiat liquidity to citizens. 2) demand for warranty of due diligence upon truthfulness (testimonialism) for all speech of all forms in the commons. 3) revocation of the copyright and institution of involuntary creative commons. 4) require sponsorship and full warranty of all costs for any immigrant, and rolling back the 64 immigration act, as well as the 14th and all related judgements. 5) addition of voluntary and involuntary disassociation without limit. I can lengthen this list but it is unnecessary. The first three will end globalism, the academy, the media, the entertainment business, and vague statements from the politicians in short order. Whether you understand these things or not, they will destroy the cosmopolitan attack on western civlization in months. Because they may shame us and harm our status and employability. But we will prosecute, judge, and hang them. Dead people can’t propagandize and lie. Curt Doolittle
  • Yes, Fascism is an Exceptional Extension of Total War

    YES FASCISM IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL OF WAR (read this or remain stupid) —“Curt, would you still say fascism possesses a useful albeit temporary function?”—Robert Harris Scott Hayes

    Fascism has an EXCEPTIONAL short term function. It is a means of marshaling every resource in a nation for war on all fronts: military, trade, economic, financial, cultural, religious and informational. But it’s as costly as war over the long term. It is a means of warfare. Just as an army is an authoritarian means of organizing a people for physical war, and investing in certain commercial sectors is a means of organizing people for trade and economic war, and organizing credit for financial war….. Fascism allows us even to organize INFORMATION for the purpose of warfare. And that is what the Fascist generation did. War is war. But we do not fight the last battle just because we understand the tactic. Today we have a different tactic. We have a very very very fragile civilization that has been at war for a century or more with the cosmopolitan financial vision of managing the world for their benefit rather than each nation using financial, legal, cultural, and informational institutions to advance each nation WITHOUT exporting capital to others – by PREVENTING the parasitism of the cosmopolitan order we live under. Fascism isn’t necessary because fascism is DISCRETIONARY. We can do the SAME THING without putting a dictator in charge. We can simply starve out the other side by cutting off their means of funding. 1) direct redistribution of fiat liquidity to citizens. 2) demand for warranty of due diligence upon truthfulness (testimonialism) for all speech of all forms in the commons. 3) revocation of the copyright and institution of involuntary creative commons. 4) require sponsorship and full warranty of all costs for any immigrant, and rolling back the 64 immigration act, as well as the 14th and all related judgements. 5) addition of voluntary and involuntary disassociation without limit. I can lengthen this list but it is unnecessary. The first three will end globalism, the academy, the media, the entertainment business, and vague statements from the politicians in short order. Whether you understand these things or not, they will destroy the cosmopolitan attack on western civlization in months. Because they may shame us and harm our status and employability. But we will prosecute, judge, and hang them. Dead people can’t propagandize and lie. Curt Doolittle
  • The Middle and Working Classes Are The Targets of Predation

    THE MIDDLE CLASS IS THE TARGET OF PREDATION ****”I see my chief concern from simply living in a world full of relative upper class scoundrels, educated imbeciles and underclass zombies, and a middle and working class that appears to consist of the only moral people extant in western society – and they are the ones that least benefit from the current order – because they are being exterminated by it.”**** Curt Doolittle The Cult of Non Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sovereign Men The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Middle and Working Classes Are The Targets of Predation

    THE MIDDLE CLASS IS THE TARGET OF PREDATION ****”I see my chief concern from simply living in a world full of relative upper class scoundrels, educated imbeciles and underclass zombies, and a middle and working class that appears to consist of the only moral people extant in western society – and they are the ones that least benefit from the current order – because they are being exterminated by it.”**** Curt Doolittle The Cult of Non Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sovereign Men The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine