EDUCATION: RETURNING TO RULE Our ‘Education’, back when only the aristocracy and it’s imitators could obtain an education, was not to manage, as was true in the as through the 19th century; was not to teach one to be an employee, or labor as it was in the early 20th, or a tax slave, as it become in the mid 20th through today, but to RULE over Territory, military, production, and family, successfully. There is no reason we cannot return to our traditional profession: RULE. And there is no reason we cannot return to teaching how to rule. 1) Fitness, Hunting, Sport, Games, and War? Absolutely. 2) Economics, Ethics, Natural Law, Contracts, Institutions, Group Strategy? Of necessity. 3) Reading, Arithmetic, Accounting, Mathematics, Programming, Engineering and Physics? Hmm. Only basics. 4) Aesthetics, Art, Myth, Literature, History? it can’t hurt. 5) Psychology, Sociology, Politics? It’s a waste of time – it’s false. 6) Religion, Philosophy, Pseudoscience? It can only hurt. THE RESTORATION IS SIMPLE. RETURN TO OUR MAJOR INDUSTRY AND EXPORT: RULE.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
EDUCATION: RETURNING TO RULE Our ‘Education’, back when only the aristocracy and
EDUCATION: RETURNING TO RULE
Our ‘Education’, back when only the aristocracy and its imitators could obtain an education, was not to manage, as was true in the as through the 19th century; was not to teach one to be an employee, or labor as it was in the early 20th, or a tax slave, as it become in the mid 20th through today, but to RULE over Territory, military, production, and family, successfully.
There is no reason we cannot return to our traditional profession: RULE. And there is no reason we cannot return to teaching how to rule.
1) Fitness, Hunting, Sport, Games, and War? Absolutely.
2) Economics, Ethics, Natural Law, Contracts, Institutions, Group Strategy? Of necessity.
3) Reading, Arithmetic, Accounting, Mathematics, Programming, Engineering and Physics? Hmm. Only basics.
4) Aesthetics, Art, Myth, Literature, History? it can’t hurt.
5) Psychology, Sociology, Politics? It’s a waste of time – its false.
6) Religion, Philosophy, Pseudoscience? It can only hurt.
THE RESTORATION IS SIMPLE.
RETURN TO OUR MAJOR INDUSTRY AND EXPORT: RULE.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-24 13:02:00 UTC
-
Governments as a Hierarchy of Producers of Commons – Where People Possess Common Interests Only
—“My question is how can government peruse multiple solutions while remaining expedient instead of the “one size fits all” solutions that seem to only cause more conflict.”— You can pursue many commons, you cannot pursue multiple norms (cultures). You can form i) a federal government that provides only the functions of insurer of last resort, ii) a regional government that provides only infrastructure commons, and iii) a local government that provides normative commons. And lastly, iv) a family that provides what is necessary to the particular circumstance. People need what they need to compete.
-
Governments as a Hierarchy of Producers of Commons – Where People Possess Common Interests Only
—“My question is how can government peruse multiple solutions while remaining expedient instead of the “one size fits all” solutions that seem to only cause more conflict.”— You can pursue many commons, you cannot pursue multiple norms (cultures). You can form i) a federal government that provides only the functions of insurer of last resort, ii) a regional government that provides only infrastructure commons, and iii) a local government that provides normative commons. And lastly, iv) a family that provides what is necessary to the particular circumstance. People need what they need to compete.
-
Germany Must Ascend, Even at the Cost of the Anglo World
Feb 26, 2017 11:34am Even at the cost of the Anglo world we must ensure that this next ascent of Germany is successful. They have been ascending since the fall of the soviet union both economically and politically and greater Germania again possesses both the population necessary (>500M), and the sphere of influence, (germanic, latin and slavic Europe), to achieve the restoration of European (Germanic) civilization. Her primary weakness is created by Anglo-American military presence (NATO). The ending of the American world empire, the restoration of the balance of powers between core states, and the natural ascent of a federated and germanic Europe will allow the german core, latin and slavic periphery to form into a world power. The natural relations today in the anglo world – as a collection of large islands across all the seas, can then return to internal development, and cultural restoration. The problem of islam “the cult of submission by the low” will be spread across Chinese, Indian, Russian, European, and African – and crushed as we have crushed all archaic civilizations in history. I realize that I am an anglo saxon. a german. And that my kin, sometime in the 1800’s fell into the folly of the jews.
-
Germany Must Ascend, Even at the Cost of the Anglo World
Feb 26, 2017 11:34am Even at the cost of the Anglo world we must ensure that this next ascent of Germany is successful. They have been ascending since the fall of the soviet union both economically and politically and greater Germania again possesses both the population necessary (>500M), and the sphere of influence, (germanic, latin and slavic Europe), to achieve the restoration of European (Germanic) civilization. Her primary weakness is created by Anglo-American military presence (NATO). The ending of the American world empire, the restoration of the balance of powers between core states, and the natural ascent of a federated and germanic Europe will allow the german core, latin and slavic periphery to form into a world power. The natural relations today in the anglo world – as a collection of large islands across all the seas, can then return to internal development, and cultural restoration. The problem of islam “the cult of submission by the low” will be spread across Chinese, Indian, Russian, European, and African – and crushed as we have crushed all archaic civilizations in history. I realize that I am an anglo saxon. a german. And that my kin, sometime in the 1800’s fell into the folly of the jews.
-
Q&A: “What’s Your ‘Official’ Opinion on Trump?”
‘OFFICIAL’ OPINION ON TRUMP: AGREE WITH CRITICISMS? —“Do these opinions of trump resonate with any opinion at the Propertarian Institute?”— No. because I know from close personal experience what kind of shitty assholes the financial capitalist class is, what kind of shitty assholes the legal capitalist class is, how shitty and corrupt the regulatory politicians are, how dishonest, and corrupt, the construction and maintenance organizations are, how shitty and corrupt and criminal the union organizations are. And I know how hard it is to employ ‘low level workers’ in a ‘high precision customer service environment’. And Trump grew up negotiation between people who are shitty lying scumbags for a living, while employing large numbers of low level workers in high precision customer service environments and then selling that stuff to people who have enough money to pay for it – usually the upper middle class around the world. Trump is doing what he has done his whole life. He is just letting the public see what that game is really all about: We are surrounded by lying thieving scumbags that prey on the middle and working classes, who are the only morally naive people moral enough in the world to fall for such criminality. Yeah and that’s my professional opinion. I have interacted with a large number of people in one capacity or another, usually as analyst giving an opinion on some sort of technical or marketing strategy given the financial resources available. My experience is that people outside of the middle and working classes are pretty much shit human beings burning down the western commons in the equivalent of a crash and grab that has lasted a century.
-
Q&A: “What’s Your ‘Official’ Opinion on Trump?”
‘OFFICIAL’ OPINION ON TRUMP: AGREE WITH CRITICISMS? —“Do these opinions of trump resonate with any opinion at the Propertarian Institute?”— No. because I know from close personal experience what kind of shitty assholes the financial capitalist class is, what kind of shitty assholes the legal capitalist class is, how shitty and corrupt the regulatory politicians are, how dishonest, and corrupt, the construction and maintenance organizations are, how shitty and corrupt and criminal the union organizations are. And I know how hard it is to employ ‘low level workers’ in a ‘high precision customer service environment’. And Trump grew up negotiation between people who are shitty lying scumbags for a living, while employing large numbers of low level workers in high precision customer service environments and then selling that stuff to people who have enough money to pay for it – usually the upper middle class around the world. Trump is doing what he has done his whole life. He is just letting the public see what that game is really all about: We are surrounded by lying thieving scumbags that prey on the middle and working classes, who are the only morally naive people moral enough in the world to fall for such criminality. Yeah and that’s my professional opinion. I have interacted with a large number of people in one capacity or another, usually as analyst giving an opinion on some sort of technical or marketing strategy given the financial resources available. My experience is that people outside of the middle and working classes are pretty much shit human beings burning down the western commons in the equivalent of a crash and grab that has lasted a century.
-
Sovereignty vs Servility
SOVEREIGNTY VERSUS SERVILITY One can hire an administrator of contracts. If that’s what you mean by ‘governor’ then that kind of “government” is something I am comfortable with. But I won’t give up my Sovereignty (My “rights as an anglo saxon”) in the choice of contracts I will prefer to pay for; which choices of contracts I prefer not to pay for; and which choice of contracts I will not tolerate. This is the difference between Sovereigns investing in Commons (Anglo Saxons) by vote and hiring project managers, and Subjects choosing their rulers by vote, who will then choose the commons they produce for those who chose them. We have had our rights for thousands of years. It took those thousands of years to preserve them. It took those thousands of years to capture them in draft form the US Constitution. And today we can capture them perfectly in a new one. So will you choose the Sovereignty of the Warrior, or the Servility of a Subject?
-
Sovereignty vs Servility
SOVEREIGNTY VERSUS SERVILITY One can hire an administrator of contracts. If that’s what you mean by ‘governor’ then that kind of “government” is something I am comfortable with. But I won’t give up my Sovereignty (My “rights as an anglo saxon”) in the choice of contracts I will prefer to pay for; which choices of contracts I prefer not to pay for; and which choice of contracts I will not tolerate. This is the difference between Sovereigns investing in Commons (Anglo Saxons) by vote and hiring project managers, and Subjects choosing their rulers by vote, who will then choose the commons they produce for those who chose them. We have had our rights for thousands of years. It took those thousands of years to preserve them. It took those thousands of years to capture them in draft form the US Constitution. And today we can capture them perfectly in a new one. So will you choose the Sovereignty of the Warrior, or the Servility of a Subject?