Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • HAVE OUR NEW WATERGATE

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/susan-rice-ordered-spy-agencies-to-produce-detailed-spreadsheets-involving-trump/WE HAVE OUR NEW WATERGATE.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-04 11:41:00 UTC

  • THE EXPLANATION OF THE ARISTOCRACY

    THE EXPLANATION OF THE ARISTOCRACY

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155190991892264

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-03 15:42:00 UTC

  • 1 – THE TRUTH OF THE ARISTOCRACY 2 – THE LIE OF THE CONSERVATIVES 3 – THE FRAUD

    1 – THE TRUTH OF THE ARISTOCRACY

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155191165772264

    2 – THE LIE OF THE CONSERVATIVES

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155191110462264

    3 – THE FRAUD OF THE PROGRESSIVES

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155191031192264

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-03 15:41:00 UTC

  • UNIVERSAL TRANSLATOR FOR WHITE CONSERVATIVE SPEECH “Science makes it hard for me

    UNIVERSAL TRANSLATOR FOR WHITE CONSERVATIVE SPEECH

    “Science makes it hard for me to claim the moral high ground at the same time I advocate democracy, because western conservatism is just a name for aristocracy, and aristocracy is just a name for meritocracy, and meritocracy is just a name for a eugenic society, and it’s hard to look you in the face, pretend you’re an equal in a democracy, while at the same time saying you’re really an evolutionary dead weight on the rest of us that needs to be removed from the gene pool if we are going to have an advanced civilization.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-03 15:20:00 UTC

  • UNIVERSAL TRANSLATOR FOR ANTI WHITE SJW SPEECH: “Science makes it hard for me to

    UNIVERSAL TRANSLATOR FOR ANTI WHITE SJW SPEECH:

    “Science makes it hard for me to free-ride, lie, cheat, obtain rents, and steal through begging, coercing, shaming, and rallying, and therefore hinders my status signaling ability, and therefore hinders my reproductive ability, and I can’t just sit here and deal with my inferiority, so I’m gonna say something to get your attention, and force you to pay the costs of shutting me up, and to shut me up before I inspire others and you gotta pay more of us to shut up in order to get anything done.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-03 14:59:00 UTC

  • West, Russia, China We play ooda-loops and always have (mobility). Russia plays

    West, Russia, China

    We play ooda-loops and always have (mobility). Russia plays wait for weakness (aggressive opportunism). china plays accumulate, delay and deceive until winning is impossible against them (aggressive defense).

    That mobility as a team, opportunism but weakness in maneuver, and absorbing damage while accumulating strength reflect military strategies – it should not surprise us that their practice of ‘truth’ follows the same strategy, or that their systems of government follow the same strategy.

    I would note that german and catholic europe are just living in denial.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-02 18:02:00 UTC

  • “Does the Overton window even exist?”– Maxim V Filimonov Great Question. Do opp

    —“Does the Overton window even exist?”– Maxim V Filimonov

    Great Question. Do opportunities exist for the seizure of power? I am pretty sure they exist. Is Overton Window a pseudoscientific statement rather than a colloquialism? Yes. Is it true? No. Is it meaningful? Yes.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-02 13:32:00 UTC

  • if you want to change culture; change culture so that it stays changed; and so t

    if you want to change culture; change culture so that it stays changed; and so that you need the fewest people to agree with your changes; and you do so at the lowest initial cost, and lowest cost of maintenance; and if you want to preserve that change without people feeling as you do, but by habit, then how do you create those behaviors? Can you force people to agree with you? to like what you do? to believe in what you do? to celebrate rituals? to spend time, money, energy, and to not fight it? How do you propose to do that?

    There is a difference between intuiting a possibility and constructing organizations that bring those possibilities into existence. And then once in existence surviving competitoin. And surviving competition persisting without changing. Since the tendency of all organizatoins is to swing to the left.

    How do you propose that?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-01 13:52:00 UTC

  • WHERE WILL THE OVERTON WINDOW SWING NEXT? —“But where will the Overton Window

    WHERE WILL THE OVERTON WINDOW SWING NEXT?

    —“But where will the Overton Window swing to next?!!!?”—Juhani Järvinen

    Romans: Cycles. Every four living generations, with the fifth forgetting everything learned by the first. Or the more recently, ‘events modify behavior only so long as people are a live that experienced them’ (and in proportion to the number who were alive then.) In other words, memories dilute with time.

    Via Strauss and Howe: the millennials will crash, be blamed like the Victorians blamed the Edwardians, and the next Generation will be conservative.

    Each generation reacts to the status quo. The boomers followed the Greatest (war) generation – and dismantled the martial state.

    The Jones and X generation – taking advantage of the consumption made possible by Nixon/Regan’s Petro-Dollar. (me).

    The Millennial/”Infantile”/”Pet” generation followed Jones-X Generations made possible by end of world communism, and the fed’s excessive liquidity to keep the economy afloat given the new competitors.

    The economy of the west will lose its position and collapse the children of the Pet Generation will despise their parents, just as the boomers despised the war generation.

    Our primary function is to protect assets so that recovery is possible.

    My mission is to punish the criminals of the (((20th century))) and their french and anglo conspirators so that it is the equivalent of the french revolution or the battle of marathon: so that it never happens again.

    We need to do a lot of killing.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-01 12:30:00 UTC

  • “Power seeks argument. It is up to some of us to produce the argumentative weapo

    “Power seeks argument. It is up to some of us to produce the argumentative weapons that those who can exert power seek.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-31 11:43:00 UTC