Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Political Classes

    Dependent

    • Non self supporting

    Independent(Freeman)

    • Self Supporting
    • Militia, Emergency, or Hospitalier Service, Continuing Male Regimental Service
    • Self Supporting, Married, three children, Continuing Male Regimental Service
    • Self Supporting, Married, three children, Male Regimental Service, Employs 25 or more non-kin in the commercial production of goods, services, and information.
    • Self Supporting, Married, More than three Children, Continuing Male Regimental Service, four consecutive generations of Burghers, Territorial Governor
    • Married, Six or more children, Male Regimental Service, Noble Family

    Citizen Burgher Nobility Monarchy

  • RT @curtdoolittle: PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE @realDonaldTrump #NewRight

    RT @curtdoolittle: PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE @realDonaldTrump #NewRight

    RT @curtdoolittle: PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE
    @realDonaldTrump #NewRight https://t.co/iVErVPqPjm

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-04 18:58:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/860206968883032064

  • The Cost and Profit of Different Orders

    Apr 27, 2017 9:56am THE PROFITABILITY OF DIFFERENT ORDERS, AND THE COST OF EACH (important) —“Curt: What is your opinion on feudalism?”—

    • Sovereigns are more profitable than citizens,
    • citizens more profitable than freemen,
    • freemen more profitable than serfs,
    • serfs more profitable than slaves, s
    • laves more profitable than enemies.

    One must educate and develop recipes (techniques), manners, ethics, morals, common law, natural law, institutions of cooperation (truth, contract, money, banking, interest, and sheriff, judge, militia, and army, and freedom of association, marriage, markets, markets for commons, and cities) in order to evolve from command(slavery) to feudalism(serfdom), to republic(freemen), to monarchy(citizens), to aristocracy (sovereigns). That requires a great deal of time, and effort. But civilizing man is a profitable enterprise. It is the most profitable enterprise we have yet discovered.

  • The Cost and Profit of Different Orders

    Apr 27, 2017 9:56am THE PROFITABILITY OF DIFFERENT ORDERS, AND THE COST OF EACH (important) —“Curt: What is your opinion on feudalism?”—

    • Sovereigns are more profitable than citizens,
    • citizens more profitable than freemen,
    • freemen more profitable than serfs,
    • serfs more profitable than slaves, s
    • laves more profitable than enemies.

    One must educate and develop recipes (techniques), manners, ethics, morals, common law, natural law, institutions of cooperation (truth, contract, money, banking, interest, and sheriff, judge, militia, and army, and freedom of association, marriage, markets, markets for commons, and cities) in order to evolve from command(slavery) to feudalism(serfdom), to republic(freemen), to monarchy(citizens), to aristocracy (sovereigns). That requires a great deal of time, and effort. But civilizing man is a profitable enterprise. It is the most profitable enterprise we have yet discovered.

  • ‎ Noah J Revoy ‎ White people need to get married and have more children. Femini

    ‎Noah J Revoy‎
    White people need to get married and have more children. Feminism, MGTOW, easy divorce, compulsory education (indoctrination) and population replacement (immigration) are leading to a demographic winter (genocide) for our people. No more white people means no more civil rights, no more technological progress, no more civilisation. Ok, so what are you doing about it? We have two options, 1) fight and 2) breed. We will need to do both to survive. Other people are starting to fight back, but very few are tackling the demographic winter. What can you do to ensure that we will have a next generation? – Get help. – Join up with others and form your tribe. – Get married. – Have more kids. – Encourage other white people to do the same. – Push back against nihilism of Feminism and MGTOW. – Join a community and share relationship wisdom. www.smv4k.com

  • I get a three day ban on FB for using the term ‘Muzzies’ to refer to ISIS. Yet F

    I get a three day ban on FB for using the term ‘Muzzies’ to refer to ISIS. Yet FB is saturated with anti-white hate speech. #NewRight #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-03 18:01:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/859830185046233089

  • Aryanism: The West Consists of Nation States or Ceases to Exist

    Anyone can build an empire with resources and technology to do so. You just can only live under the type of rule, institutions, and culture, necessary to maintain an empire. And that means european civilization retains many small nation states or it ceases to exist. Because you cannot have a high trust heterogeneous political order. It’s not possible. —“If your people are organically organized, clannish, tribal, egalitarian and have a thing for “purity” then they will also have high trust. You can expand, but you can’t build an empire or you’ll destroy it. Empires require bureaucracy and hierarchy as well as the extension of kinship to others. People that can’t (and didn’t!) do extended families can’t do empires. I guess It should be obvious.”— Markets for nations. Markets for regions. Markets for whatever we want – among our kin. We can build a civilization but we cannot build an empire.

    An empire by definition crosses ethnic and cultural lines. a civilization by definition is defined but ethnic and cultural lines. America is an empire and cannot therefore persist as a european civilization under common law.

  • Correcting the Term “Government”

    Rule and Government are two different things. Nomocracy = Rule of Law (by Judges). Therefore under nomocracy (judge rule), ‘government’ provides laws. What we call ‘government’ more correctly provides a method for the construction of commons. We have conflated the functions of government and commons production, whenever the functions of judicial and commons production are combined into a monopoly. (a crime against reciprocity – most often because of technological and cultural incompetence at identifying reciprocity, or the intentional violation of reciprocity for the purpose of predation).

    We can construct commons the individual authority, oligarchical choice, representative choice, or market choice. (And, yes, I know, I am ‘correcting’ a lot of past colloquial language and that this is hard to learn.)

  • We can revolt and separate, or we can return to our traditional industry, of col

    We can revolt and separate, or we can return to our traditional industry, of colonization, rule, domestication, and eugenics. #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-02 16:43:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/859448323002048512

  • Solving the Google, Facebook Wikipedia Problem, and News in the 21st Century

    As far as I can tell, Google, Facebook, and Wikipedia hold the same conditional monopoly as did ATT and are just as important if not more so. Yet they are more insidious because while ATT controlled the quality and cost of our information distribution, by contrast, Google, Facebook, and Wikipedia control the quality and cost of the information itself, and that information is not subject to market forces. There is no reason that we cannot (a) heavily tax these institutions, (b) heavily regulate these institutions (c) heavily localize these institutions, and therefore (d) reduce social and political conflict conducted via these institutions.

    The minimum regulation I would place on them is that (a) no true statement can be suppressed. All non-false opinions, judgements, categorizations, can be expressed no matter how undesirable, (b) the ‘slider’ method to suppress or expose emotive language should be required. (c) individuals would have to declare their political biases, and then i) non-conforming information would be hidden from them, ii) they could not complain about non conforming that the sought out that conflicted with their profile, but instead, must fix their own profile, ii) and people cannot comment on that which is outside their profile. Facebook and Google can already do this. Easily. Wikipedia can do this, just as easily. So can newspapers. And the news producer that does so, rather than having an editorial board, will survive, the rest will not. So either you allow for both Aristocratic, nationalist, masculine, and eugenic people who look for rule of law and science, as WELL as communist, globalist, feminine, and dysgenic people who advocate social construction and pseudoscience or you are de facto creating an informational monopoly on a public commons. Between the axis of gender/class strategy, and the axis of empirical/supernatural method of argument you can define all of the major discourses in this world. Ergo, these companies can do this voluntarily or we will regulate them into utilities without the choice. WHY DON’T THEY?