Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • CULTURAL MARXISM IS THE STATUS QUO. So that means we reactionaries are the progr

    CULTURAL MARXISM IS THE STATUS QUO.

    So that means we reactionaries are the progressives.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 13:31:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATIVES VS PROGRESSIVES (Conservatives concern themselves with preventing

    CONSERVATIVES VS PROGRESSIVES

    (Conservatives concern themselves with preventing power, ruling and preventing parasitism. Progressives with obtaining power, governing, and creating parasitism.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 13:30:00 UTC

  • POLITICAL SCIENCE ISN”T VERY COMPLICATED You can reduce a lot of political scien

    POLITICAL SCIENCE ISN”T VERY COMPLICATED

    You can reduce a lot of political science to the composition of the army:

    0) raiding bands (everywhere)

    1) militia volunteers(germanic),

    2) professional warriors with militia volunteers(western),

    3) standing semi-professional armies (china),

    4) slave armies (islam).

    The lower that number the higher the trust between members.

    The more members in that high trust order the more widespread the trust.

    Out of the “order of men” all civilization results.

    Out of the geography, all orders of men result.

    The Militia (trained) with Professional Warriors produces the highest trust. And enfranchisement limited to those in the militia.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 13:11:00 UTC

  • COMEY AND OBAMA’S FACILITATION OF MUSLIM INVASION 1. Before he bombed the Boston

    COMEY AND OBAMA’S FACILITATION OF MUSLIM INVASION

    1. Before he bombed the Boston Marathon, the FBI interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev but let him go. Russia sent the Obama Administration a second warning, but the FBI opted against investigating him again.

    2. Shortly after the NSA scandal exploded in 2013, the FBI was exposed conducting its own data mining on innocent Americans; the agency, Bloomberg reported, retains that material for decades (even if no wrongdoing is found).

    3. The FBI had possession of emails sent by Nidal Hasan saying he wanted to kill his fellow soldiers to protect the Taliban — but didn’t intervene, leading many critics to argue the tragedy that resulted in the death of 31 Americans at Fort Hood could have been prevented.

    4. During the Obama Administration, the FBI claimed that two private jets were being used primarily for counterterrorism, when in fact they were mostly being used for Eric Holder and Robert Mueller’s business and personal travel.

    5. When the FBI demanded Apple create a “backdoor” that would allow law enforcement agencies to unlock the cell phones of various suspects, the company refused, sparking a battle between the feds and America’s biggest tech company. What makes this incident indicative of Comey’s questionable management of the agency is that a) The FBI jumped the gun, as they were indeed ultimately able to crack the San Bernardino terrorist’s phone, and b) Almost every other major national security figure sided with Apple (from former CIA Director General Petraeus to former CIA Director James Woolsey to former director of the NSA, General Michael Hayden), warning that such a “crack” would inevitably wind up in the wrong hands.

    6. In 2015, the FBI conducted a controversial raid on a Texas political meeting, finger printing, photographing, and seizing phones from attendees (some in the group believe in restoring Texas as an independent constitutional republic).

    7. During its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified material, the FBI made an unusual deal in which Clinton aides were both given immunity and allowed to destroy their laptops.

    8. The father of the radical Islamist who detonated a backpack bomb in New York City in 2016 alerted the FBI to his son’s radicalization. The FBI, however, cleared Ahmad Khan Rahami after a brief interview.

    9. The FBI also investigated the terrorist who killed 49 people and wounded 53 more at the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Fla. Despite a more than 10-month investigation of Omar Mateen — during which Mateen admitting lying to agents — the FBI opted against pressing further and closed its case.

    10. CBS recently reported that when two terrorists sought to kill Americans attending the “Draw Muhammad” event in Garland, Texas, the FBI not only had an understanding an attack was coming, but actually had an undercover agent traveling with the Islamists, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi. The FBI has refused to comment on why the agent on the scene did not intervene during the attack.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 13:03:00 UTC

  • ARE THE RESIGNED CONSERVATIVES May 9, 2017 at 7:21 pm The enlightenment conserva

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/what-new-york-doesnt-understand-about-the-far-right/WE ARE THE RESIGNED CONSERVATIVES

    May 9, 2017 at 7:21 pm

    The enlightenment conservative was an idealist. The 19th century conservative a utopian. The great war conservatives apologists. The post war conservatives hopeful (in denial). The Current Era conservatives resigned.

    Every generation before us has failed to arrest the second christianization of the west, this time by psuedo-rationalism, pseudoscience and the industrialization of propaganda, all promising equality and prosperity for all.

    We know what abrahamism, multiculturalism, and dysgenic reproduction produce: the middle east’s tribalism and constant decline.

    We have abandoned reasoning and argument. And all that is left is either a controlled dissolution of the continental government, and return to regional differences that kept europe advancing faster than the rest of the world, or a civil war that some of us (myself included) are laying the groundwork for, that will lead to an uncontrolled dissolution of the continental government.

    There is no Western Expansion and the bugaboo of slavery to justify a continental empire over so large a territory with so diverse a people, with such different cultures, and different interests while continuing the pretense that such a thing is ‘good for all’. It is demonstrably not.

    Let a thousand nations bloom.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-09 19:22:00 UTC

  • SIZE OF GOVERNMENT? (AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT) Theoretically, as a rule of thumb,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_sectorTHE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT? (AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT)

    Theoretically, as a rule of thumb, the maximum is 20%. As a rule of thumb, we can produce about a 20% surplus in the long term, and we can accelerate innovation and consumption to raise that number through debt at the cost of increased volatility and risk.

    The US govt is about 15% of the population but, that’s misleading since we use so many contractors. It’s useful for judging the political bias of the people. Everything I’ve read is that it hovers int the 20-22% range in total.

    %GDP is a better judge of government scale. OECD countries range from about 35 to 55%, with the USA hovering near the low end (34%) but this includes financial magic because of petrodollar demand. France is at the high end with 55%. The general western consensus is that between 40-50 is the liberal ideal. And in total taxation we all reach that number.

    But that assumes that the government employees obtain total compensation equal to but not more than the general population.

    My suggestion (My Demand) is that not all countries need be the same, and as such those that suppress the reproduction of the underclass can most easily (and very rapidly) decrease the cost of ALL government burden, and thereby increase the returns of all shareholders (citizens).

    The USA was designed to exit the parasitism of the upper and lower classes by creating a middle class and upper middle class society on new territory. This is the only form of society in which democratic participation can survive. And this experiment has been under attack – successfully.

    The attack has been achieved by replacing arguments over rule of law (morality) with arguments over consumption (economics).

    The best thing we can do is restore rule of law, natural law, common law of reciprocity in not only goods, and services, but information. And therefore restore markets in everything.

    The best thing you can do for your people is eliminate non-professional immigration, and eliminate underclass reproduction. Period. End of story.

    Like all things: as complexity increases, Via-Negativa defeats via-positiva.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-09 10:03:00 UTC

  • So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic repr

    So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic reproduction and superstition, or we colonize by eugenic upper class by force and law?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 14:01:00 UTC

  • GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION CHANGE/WAR 1) Socialism = centra

    GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION

    CHANGE/WAR

    1) Socialism = central control of private and commons for the purpose of conducting warfare on one”s own people, for the purpose of transitioning a backward people. Very strong.

    2) Fascism = Central control of the commons. Private control of production. But limited to Autarkic opportunities. Funding of nationalism. (fascism is a means of conducting economic warfare in times of stress). Very strong.

    3) Napoleonism = total mobilization of the public and private economy for military economic and institutional warfare. Very strong.

    —vs–

    STEADY STATE / COMMERCE

    3) Aristocracy / Monarchy (steady state)

    Private ownership of property and commons. but weak.

    2) Republicanism / Oligarchy / Nobility (steady state)

    Private ownership of property and commons but weak.

    1) Social Democracy (steady State)

    Private ownership of property and commons but weak.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 10:03:00 UTC

  • RETURN TO COLONIALISM? If “multiculturalism” is good, then “colonialism” is good

    RETURN TO COLONIALISM?

    If “multiculturalism” is good, then “colonialism” is good. If multiculturalism is bad, the colonialism is bad. What is the difference between invading others and being invaded by others?

    Multiculturalism is invasion. Colonization is invasion.

    h/t: David Kohler

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 07:19:00 UTC

  • LET ME HELP YOU. Stop worrying about france. Democracy is the enemy. You are the

    LET ME HELP YOU.

    Stop worrying about france.

    Democracy is the enemy.

    You are the last hope for your people.

    Are you going to do what it takes?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-07 20:11:00 UTC