Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • SUNIC, JORJANI, DOOLITTLE ROUNDTABLE “Western Civilization: Circumventing the Fr

    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/western-civilization-circumventing-the-frankfurt-and-postmodern-schools-tickets-36272906239DUCHESNE, SUNIC, JORJANI, DOOLITTLE ROUNDTABLE

    “Western Civilization: Circumventing the Frankfurt and Postmodern Schools”

    September 26th, NY, NY.

    Our intent: to hold a rational and scientific discourse on the circumvention and defeat of the pseudoscientific and pseudo historic (marxist and feminist ), and pseudo-rational (postmodern and globalist) schools of deception.

    Our goal is to produce a video with a non trivial half-life that will give authors a venue for expressing how their work can assist in the falsification of pseudoscience, pseudo-historicism, and pseudo-rationalism, and what areas of society can be effected by our efforts, and what other efforts might be necessary to do so.

    Because of this goal, we are able to provide a small audience direct access to presenters and produce all of the beneficial consequences of a bit of personal interaction.

    PLEASE JOIN US

    We’re kicking off the Propertarian Institute in the USA.

    A personal gathering, with dinner afterward.

    Please buy a ticket to this event and join us.

    Early bird tickets start at $50 (12 only), and the rest at $65. Dinner is separate at $50.

    (Proper dress required.)(Discussion will be recorded))

    GET A CODE SO YOU CAN REGISTER:

    PM Megan K. Usui ​ or Shanaynay Tomson

    LINK TO REGISTER FOR THE EVENT


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 11:29:00 UTC

  • “Alt-Right is divided!” Men divide into tribes to choose leaders, but tribes fig

    “Alt-Right is divided!”

    Men divide into tribes to choose leaders, but tribes fight together to win wars.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 12:14:00 UTC

  • The Alt-Right is not an ideological strategy for obtaining power in a democratic

    The Alt-Right is not an ideological strategy for obtaining power in a democratic polity – but the preparation for civil war.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 09:31:00 UTC

  • THE POSTMODERN ALT-RIGHT vs. THE MODERN NEW-RIGHT —“One may say that my use of

    THE POSTMODERN ALT-RIGHT vs. THE MODERN NEW-RIGHT

    —“One may say that my use of “alt-right” is misleading since those who call themselves alt-right do not necessarily agree. Some are just sick of the SJWs, some are nazi’s, a few are disaffected libertarians, others are socialists …. but all of them are anti modernist. They simply reject the pillars of the western philosophical cannon. This is what makes them quintessentially post/anti-modern. To hell with the categorical imperative. To hell with classical liberalism. To hell with moderation. And to hell with judge discovered law.”—Ayelam Valentine Agaliba

    REPEAT THAT. The Alt Right:

    – is post/anti-modern, because it:

    – abandons the categorical imperative.

    – abandons classical liberalism.

    – abandons moderation.

    – abandons judge discovered law.

    I haven’t done this in Propertarianism. I’ve merely extended the suppression of parasitism in product(property) and service(action) to information(speech).

    So in my opinion, I have COMPLETED the modern program – finally.

    And made postmodern discourse into prosecutable fraud.

    The *ONLY* painful bit is that christianity must complete it’s transition to hero worship of jesus and abandon the lies of ‘god’.

    There are no exceptions to truth. Truth is truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 06:30:00 UTC

  • The alt right is not an ideological strategy for obtaining power in a democratic

    The alt right is not an ideological strategy for obtaining power in a democratic policy – but the preparation for civil war.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:23:00 UTC

  • “You must take the responsibility to govern yourself, or society will have no ch

    “You must take the responsibility to govern yourself, or society will have no choice but to govern you.” – Joel Davis


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:54:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIAN AND CONSERVATIVE CRITICS OF THE ALT RIGHT AND NEW RIGHT The evidence

    http://www.scifiwright.com/2017/07/doctor-of-common-sense-and-zo/FOR LIBERTARIAN AND CONSERVATIVE CRITICS OF THE ALT RIGHT AND NEW RIGHT

    The evidence of the failure of libertarianism and conservatism is provided by the fact that conservatives have ONLY produced moral literature of moral equivocation and naturalistic fallacy, and NEVER produced a rational, or ratio-scientific literature with which to defend themselves against Abrahamism and Platonism in the ancient world (judaism/christianity/islam), or Abrahamism in the modern world (classical liberal equalitarianism(Middle Class), Feminism(Women), Marxism(Labor), or Postmodern Identitarianism(Slaves)) – or against the methods of argument used in deceitful discourse (Pseudo-Myth(Supernaturalism), Pseudo-Rationalism(Platonic Idealism, Postmodern Lit.), and Pseudo-Science (Boazianism, Marxism, Freudianism,Cantorianism).

    The Alt Right has adopted the techniques of the marxists and postmodernists which is to abandon reason and merely propagandize, rally, shame ridicule, silence by volume, poisoning any discourse it can intrude upon in order to hindre emotional momentum, and directly engaging in opposition violence when possible, and to defeat the left when possible by letting the left demonstrate their character.

    The New Right (Myself) has abandoned the classical liberal project, the presumption of hopefulness that political bias is other than expression of individual and group evolutionary strategy: a proxy for war. And that any further debate is futile, and that only violence to bring about the restoration of the traditional compromises between the genders and classes – and if not possible, return to the subjugation of female genders and under classes. But that the status quo or the left’s further conquest of the west (for the second time) is not tolerable – even less tolerable than civil war.

    Now like any movement there are a tiny number of thought leaders, a small number of ideological leaders, a large number of agitators, communicators, and propagandists, and even larger numbers of sympathizers and advocates, and the main body of interested but uncommitted followers. As one would expect, the right does not consolidate into a single equalitarian body (as do females), but separates into tribes (as do males) using their own sentiments, language, arguments, and leaders. Right and men seek hunting packs with similar but specific agendas designed for rapid change, not a herd (and women and underclasses) with a loose directional agenda of incremental but continuous improvement.

    On the alt right, (although they dislike this analysis intensely), it is fairly clear that the tribes have organized around class lines (and rougnly IQ) and method of argument that *reflects their social competency*. And that evidence appears as the the nat-soc(threats), green-frogs(antagonism), masculinists and rationalists (resistance), classical liberals and traditionalists (active opposition), various scientists HBD, RR, etc (refutation), Rule of Law/philosophers(Solution Definition), Traditionalists (wishful thinkers – historical escapists), literary occultists like evola, nietzsche ( literary escapists / shamers), and techo-libertarians (tech escapists), new-age/pseudoscientists (conspiracy theorists and pseudoscience escapists).

    My opinion, as someone who has seen this transition (cycle) coming, and worked on it for many years, is that for the tribes of men to unite, those men need (a) a moral license, (b) a solution to demand (c) a plan of transition to the new solution (d) a strategy, tactics, and leadership by which to raise the cost of the status quo, until the demanded solution or a compromise is met. In other words, men need an objective to fight for using the methods of conflcit that they know how to employ. And our job is to succeed where the conservatives in ALL THEIR ITERATIONS since Burke first launched his criticism, have FAILED TO PRODUCE.

    We are in a cold civil war. That civil war can turn hot at any moment. I expect it to. The question is, who has that solution?

    Or rather, who ELSE has that solution?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    =====

    IN RESPONSE TO:


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:47:00 UTC

  • You aren’t oppressed. You’re under domestication until capable of Sovereignty of

    You aren’t oppressed. You’re under domestication until capable of Sovereignty of Reason, Emotion, and Action in Adult Civilization


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:06:00 UTC

  • OPPRESSION LIT. Feminism: The Women Marxism: The Laborers Identitarianism: The S

    OPPRESSION LIT.

    Feminism: The Women

    Marxism: The Laborers

    Identitarianism: The Slaves


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:00:00 UTC

  • If impulse suppression, meritocracy, equal opportunity, and kin selection are th

    If impulse suppression, meritocracy, equal opportunity, and kin selection are the values of “white supremacy” why NOT be white supremacists?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 05:39:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892620858757394432

    Reply addressees: @LisaBloom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892568799798538240


    IN REPLY TO:

    @LisaBloom

    After discriminating against LGBTs, Muslims & immigrants, Trump wants DOJ civil rights lawyers to protect whites. https://t.co/6xikC7PLAR

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892568799798538240