Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Political Biases Are Merely Reproduction In Action

    Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s experiential and my operational diagrams. Personally I simply see one axis and three implementations: 1) reproductive strategy, 2) vocabulary, and 3) temporality. We all justify our reproductive strategies. Our reproductive strategy biases our temporal perception in the division of perception, cognition, negotiation, advocacy, and labor. Our Grammar expresses our negotiation in that division of perception that suits our reproductive strategy. We all need a portfolio of decidability. Our decidability is reducible to our reproductive strategy, compromised by our survival and operating strategy. I think the hard thing to imagine is the dream state (associating) action state (planning) spectrum. How action oriented or experience oriented we are. If you put that as a fourth criteria it would probably mirror the solipsistic autistic spectrum that mirrors the construction of female to male brains. Nature works with a very small number of rules that can be used to create complexity through vast permutation. As far as I know all human behavior consists of the prey drive, from which we evolved the mating drive, the cooperating drive is an extension of the mating drive, and the linguistic drive (order) is an outgrowth of the cooperating drive. From simple things emerge complexity.

  • Why not both (a) take the high right position, and (b) openly advocate for a rev

    Why not both (a) take the high right position, and (b) openly advocate for a revolution that devolves the federal government so that regions, or states, or even counties can produce their own normative commons leaving the federal government responsible only for defense, central bank clearing, and insurer of last resort (disasters, old age, etc?)

    In other words, why not make revolutionary change a core tenet of the institute. Not just for America, but for all peoples in the world?

    The restoration of truth to the public discourse, politics, markets, and law, the restoration of self determination for all peoples. And the production of commons most suitable to the transcendence of individual polities.

    Openly discuss revolution on behalf of everyone.

    ( I want to keep the moral high ground until revolutionary action is necessary. There is no value in burning myself on the right’s pyre of self sacrifice. I don’t need the personal confirmation. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 13:44:00 UTC

  • “You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior

    “You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior of some of them. But that’s precisely what you must do in the case of gun owners.” -Kenneth Allen Hopf In other words, a double standard is a violation of reciprocity and under natural law is a crime.

  • “You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior

    “You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior of some of them. But that’s precisely what you must do in the case of gun owners.” -Kenneth Allen Hopf

    In other words, a double standard is a violation of reciprocity and under natural law is a crime.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 10:27:00 UTC

  • “You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior

    “You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior of some of them. But that’s precisely what you must do in the case of gun owners.” -Kenneth Allen Hopf In other words, a double standard is a violation of reciprocity and under natural law is a crime.

  • I see why you are a leader and not in politics. “The successful politician owes

    I see why you are a leader and not in politics. “The successful politician owes his power to the fact that he moves within the accepted framework of thought, that he thinks and talks conventionally. It would be almost a contradiction in terms for a politician to be a leader in the field of ideas. His task in a democracy is to find out what the opinions held by the largest number are, not to give currency to new opinions which may become the majority view in some distant future.” — Friedrich August von Hayek (1899-1992), Nobel Laureate of Economic Sciences 1974 Curt, your role is to break the mold and the minds of weak men.

  • I see why you are a leader and not in politics. “The successful politician owes

    I see why you are a leader and not in politics. “The successful politician owes his power to the fact that he moves within the accepted framework of thought, that he thinks and talks conventionally. It would be almost a contradiction in terms for a politician to be a leader in the field of ideas. His task in a democracy is to find out what the opinions held by the largest number are, not to give currency to new opinions which may become the majority view in some distant future.” — Friedrich August von Hayek (1899-1992), Nobel Laureate of Economic Sciences 1974 Curt, your role is to break the mold and the minds of weak men.

  • Losing Empires

    ST LOUIS. The people who lost their empire next most quickly, were the people least willing to kill to maintain it (british). The people who lost them next most quickly were those who tried to maintain them cheaply(french).

    The people who lost them next most quickly were those who ran them poorly (russians, mongols). The people who lost their next most quickly, were those who over extended them (roman). The people who held their empires, were those that didn’t overextend them, didn’t run them poorly, didn’t run them cheaply, and who were willing to kill to maintain them (China, Egypt). “Kill them until they stop coming. Then kill all those who you can find. Then kill all their relatives you can find. Then take their best things and burn the rest to the ground – erasing all trace of their existence.”

  • Losing Empires

    ST LOUIS. The people who lost their empire next most quickly, were the people least willing to kill to maintain it (british). The people who lost them next most quickly were those who tried to maintain them cheaply(french).

    The people who lost them next most quickly were those who ran them poorly (russians, mongols). The people who lost their next most quickly, were those who over extended them (roman). The people who held their empires, were those that didn’t overextend them, didn’t run them poorly, didn’t run them cheaply, and who were willing to kill to maintain them (China, Egypt). “Kill them until they stop coming. Then kill all those who you can find. Then kill all their relatives you can find. Then take their best things and burn the rest to the ground – erasing all trace of their existence.”

  • Socialism vs Communism

    NATIONAL (MIDDLE CLASS) SOCIALISM, VS INTERNATIONAL (UNDERCLASS) COMMUNISM National Socialism (Tribalism) Pro Western vs. International Communism (Classism) Anti-Western. National Socialism: Defensive Strategy: Monopoly High Culture, Industrialized production of commons, Public limits on and cooperation with Industry, Private commerce, Not autarkic but highly nationalist trade biases. With the purpose of policy the intergenerational family, and the suppression of the underclasses. Right of Exit. (Middle Class and Working Class Bias) International Communism: Offensive Strategy: Monopoly Low Culture, Industrialized production of commons, Public control of industry, public control of commerce, Not Autarkic but Expansionist. The purpose of policy the ‘individual’, and the expansion and ‘uplifting’ of the underclasses. (Laboring Class and Underclass Bias) You know the ancient world origins of judaism, christianity, and islam are in the underclass revolution against the (white) aristocracy, by replacing tragedy, sacrifice, and the trials of Achilles (the wealthy farmers), with the tragedy, sacrifice, and the trials of Jews, Jesus, Muhammed (the poor pastoralists). Why do you think that National Socialism (Nationalist Middle Class, Economic warfare) versus International Communism (Universalist Underclass Economic Warfare) is any different in our era than the battle between the high trust middle class agrarian traders, and the low trust lower class pastoralist laborers? What is the difference between postmodernism and christianity? None. They’re both for the purpose of making false promises to the underclasses so that they use their numbers to destroy the aristocracy and create a dark age.