Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • What Do Americans Think Of The Fact That Their Country Is Seen Almost Everywhere On Earth As The Most Arrogant And Bellicose Country Responsible Of The Death Of Millions Of Innocent People?

    WE LOOK AT SUCH PEOPLE AS UNGRATEFUL CHILDREN.

    —-”What do Americans think of the fact that their country is seen almost everywhere on Earth as the most arrogant and bellicose country responsible of the death of millions of innocent people?”—-

    What do Americans think? You mean uneducated or educated, or educated and knowledgeable, or educated, and knowledgeable, and experience americans?

    For the educated, and knowledgeable and experience American, we feel quite rightly that the world is ungrateful for westerners and americans dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, child death, early death, disease, tyranny. Yes, the european empires tried to drag the world out of a 2000 year dark age and did so profitably. And yes during the world wars, they collapsed and failed to finish the job. And yes, america post-war forced those countries to modernize thesleves rather than directly ruling them as did the colonizers. And yes, communism, socialism, and islamic fundamentalism are all means by which the world resisted being dragged out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, child death, early death, disease, and tyranny.

    And yes, we are trying to stop the spread of regressive islam, the same way stopped the spread of regressive socialism, and the same way we stopped the spread of regressive communism. Unfortunately, we are internally under attack by the newest pseudoscientific pseudo rational religion called ‘postmodernism’. And we are no longer in the economic position to fight internal cults (postmodernism that owns our universities and media and government), nor are we in the position to hold states and people accountable for their rule. Nor arwe we in the position to rule states directly. Because the cost is just too high compared to a century ago.

    The USA has had a simple policy since the end of the world war that is unstated:
    1 – This kind of war must never happen again – mankind will end.
    2 – We can prevent such a war from happening by bringing all people into an interdependent economic world order. Economic cooperation changes ‘conflicts’ from physical to economic, cultural, and informational. It is still conflict, but it is less bad than war.
    3 – People will pursue the interdependent economic world order for the simple reason that they would prefer the comforts of consumer capitalism than to be envious of those that have them.
    4 – We can achieve this by a) preventing expansion of state power, b) directing states to producing human rights (all of which are but property rights), c) advancing democracy so that states will work at human rights (property rights) and then by consequences, join the world economic order out of self interest. d) advancing the self determination of peoples, but retaining borders.

    The problem with this set of goals is that:
    a) most peoples are not demographically advanced enough to adopt consumer capitalism, rule of law, and democracy. Familialism and corruption are too common in the rest of the world, and only northern europeans have succeeded in eliminating it. (Read Fukuyama for some of the reasons why)
    b) americans have said ‘self determination’ and ‘democracy’ (The Carrot) but have not spoken the consequence (The Stick). Which is ‘if you choose poorly we will punish your government, and by consequence punish you.)
    c) Had we completed the colonial ( modernization) project in russia, china, and finally in the middle east, rather than abandoning those peoples, we may have made this process less full of conflict, as did the british in their colonies. but at present we are still struggling with russian, chinese, iranian, pakistani aggression, and unfortunately, north Korea’s threat.

    We have paid a high price in blood and treasure where we could just have easily ruled the world exploitatively and by force – without much effort at all. What other people would do such a thing?

    How many people has Islam killed? How many have Communists Killed? How many have westerners dragged out of ignorance, superstition, poverty and disease?

    Our entire project is nothing more than trying to prevent another world war in the process of dragging people out of the abrahamic (jewish, christian, muslim->Marxist-Socialist, Postmodernist, fundamentalist) dark age.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-Americans-think-of-the-fact-that-their-country-is-seen-almost-everywhere-on-Earth-as-the-most-arrogant-and-bellicose-country-responsible-of-the-death-of-millions-of-innocent-people

  • Which Country Best Reflects Your Political And Ethical Philosophy?

    Switzerland. Small, homogenous, locally organized country win no external ambitions, and a universal militia. Cant be done much better.

    https://www.quora.com/Which-country-best-reflects-your-political-and-ethical-philosophy

  • As A Rural American, What Would You Like Those On The Coasts (in The City) To Know About You?

    I would like them to secede or allow us to secede so that each of us can live life how we wish without imposing the costs of our preferences on the other. In simple terms, the coasts have high population densities and are heterogeneous expensive micro-cultures, with vast but low cost, high risk commons. Those of us in the germanic states (yes, that’s the difference) live in low population densities with much larger commons to manage with less wealth. In other words, our personal, economic, social, and political needs are incompatible.

    Separate in a productive manner. Or revolt and separate in costly manner.

    Civil wars eventually happen. The american civil war is not over. It’s still going on because we HAVEN’T separated.

    https://www.quora.com/As-a-rural-American-what-would-you-like-those-on-the-coasts-in-the-city-to-know-about-you

  • What Do Americans Think Of The Fact That Their Country Is Seen Almost Everywhere On Earth As The Most Arrogant And Bellicose Country Responsible Of The Death Of Millions Of Innocent People?

    WE LOOK AT SUCH PEOPLE AS UNGRATEFUL CHILDREN.

    —-”What do Americans think of the fact that their country is seen almost everywhere on Earth as the most arrogant and bellicose country responsible of the death of millions of innocent people?”—-

    What do Americans think? You mean uneducated or educated, or educated and knowledgeable, or educated, and knowledgeable, and experience americans?

    For the educated, and knowledgeable and experience American, we feel quite rightly that the world is ungrateful for westerners and americans dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, child death, early death, disease, tyranny. Yes, the european empires tried to drag the world out of a 2000 year dark age and did so profitably. And yes during the world wars, they collapsed and failed to finish the job. And yes, america post-war forced those countries to modernize thesleves rather than directly ruling them as did the colonizers. And yes, communism, socialism, and islamic fundamentalism are all means by which the world resisted being dragged out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, child death, early death, disease, and tyranny.

    And yes, we are trying to stop the spread of regressive islam, the same way stopped the spread of regressive socialism, and the same way we stopped the spread of regressive communism. Unfortunately, we are internally under attack by the newest pseudoscientific pseudo rational religion called ‘postmodernism’. And we are no longer in the economic position to fight internal cults (postmodernism that owns our universities and media and government), nor are we in the position to hold states and people accountable for their rule. Nor arwe we in the position to rule states directly. Because the cost is just too high compared to a century ago.

    The USA has had a simple policy since the end of the world war that is unstated:
    1 – This kind of war must never happen again – mankind will end.
    2 – We can prevent such a war from happening by bringing all people into an interdependent economic world order. Economic cooperation changes ‘conflicts’ from physical to economic, cultural, and informational. It is still conflict, but it is less bad than war.
    3 – People will pursue the interdependent economic world order for the simple reason that they would prefer the comforts of consumer capitalism than to be envious of those that have them.
    4 – We can achieve this by a) preventing expansion of state power, b) directing states to producing human rights (all of which are but property rights), c) advancing democracy so that states will work at human rights (property rights) and then by consequences, join the world economic order out of self interest. d) advancing the self determination of peoples, but retaining borders.

    The problem with this set of goals is that:
    a) most peoples are not demographically advanced enough to adopt consumer capitalism, rule of law, and democracy. Familialism and corruption are too common in the rest of the world, and only northern europeans have succeeded in eliminating it. (Read Fukuyama for some of the reasons why)
    b) americans have said ‘self determination’ and ‘democracy’ (The Carrot) but have not spoken the consequence (The Stick). Which is ‘if you choose poorly we will punish your government, and by consequence punish you.)
    c) Had we completed the colonial ( modernization) project in russia, china, and finally in the middle east, rather than abandoning those peoples, we may have made this process less full of conflict, as did the british in their colonies. but at present we are still struggling with russian, chinese, iranian, pakistani aggression, and unfortunately, north Korea’s threat.

    We have paid a high price in blood and treasure where we could just have easily ruled the world exploitatively and by force – without much effort at all. What other people would do such a thing?

    How many people has Islam killed? How many have Communists Killed? How many have westerners dragged out of ignorance, superstition, poverty and disease?

    Our entire project is nothing more than trying to prevent another world war in the process of dragging people out of the abrahamic (jewish, christian, muslim->Marxist-Socialist, Postmodernist, fundamentalist) dark age.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-Americans-think-of-the-fact-that-their-country-is-seen-almost-everywhere-on-Earth-as-the-most-arrogant-and-bellicose-country-responsible-of-the-death-of-millions-of-innocent-people

  • Would Those Who Emigrated Return To Russia If Navalny Or Another Opposition Leader Won And Started Mass Reforms?

    A) Never, ever happen. putin is too popular. Navalny has support of urban minority activists.
    B) Russia has all the reforms she can handle. She lacks the money to do it faster. And lacks the people to do it faster. Some things take generations. People with bad habits must literally die off.
    C) democracy has turned out to be a suicidal thing, and russians are right to resist it.

    Russia doesn’t need more activism. It needs a bigger middle class. and putin is doing that, while preventing a return to the oligarchs that preyed upon his people.

    https://www.quora.com/Would-those-who-emigrated-return-to-Russia-if-Navalny-or-another-opposition-leader-won-and-started-mass-reforms

  • As A Rural American, What Would You Like Those On The Coasts (in The City) To Know About You?

    I would like them to secede or allow us to secede so that each of us can live life how we wish without imposing the costs of our preferences on the other. In simple terms, the coasts have high population densities and are heterogeneous expensive micro-cultures, with vast but low cost, high risk commons. Those of us in the germanic states (yes, that’s the difference) live in low population densities with much larger commons to manage with less wealth. In other words, our personal, economic, social, and political needs are incompatible.

    Separate in a productive manner. Or revolt and separate in costly manner.

    Civil wars eventually happen. The american civil war is not over. It’s still going on because we HAVEN’T separated.

    https://www.quora.com/As-a-rural-American-what-would-you-like-those-on-the-coasts-in-the-city-to-know-about-you

  • Would Those Who Emigrated Return To Russia If Navalny Or Another Opposition Leader Won And Started Mass Reforms?

    A) Never, ever happen. putin is too popular. Navalny has support of urban minority activists.
    B) Russia has all the reforms she can handle. She lacks the money to do it faster. And lacks the people to do it faster. Some things take generations. People with bad habits must literally die off.
    C) democracy has turned out to be a suicidal thing, and russians are right to resist it.

    Russia doesn’t need more activism. It needs a bigger middle class. and putin is doing that, while preventing a return to the oligarchs that preyed upon his people.

    https://www.quora.com/Would-those-who-emigrated-return-to-Russia-if-Navalny-or-another-opposition-leader-won-and-started-mass-reforms

  • Why Do People Say It’s Not Their Responsibility To Explain Issues Of Social Justice, Racism, And Oppression, When They Also Say A White, Straight Man Can Never Experience These Things?

    Don’t you think that by asking this question you are using racism against white people?

    Look. White people made modernity and dragged everyone else into it kicking and screaming.

    White people produce the ONLY high trust- low corruption high truth telling society other than Japan.

    When other peoples produce the same levels of development then they will obtain the same treatment.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-say-its-not-their-responsibility-to-explain-issues-of-social-justice-racism-and-oppression-when-they-also-say-a-white-straight-man-can-never-experience-these-things

  • Which Country Best Reflects Your Political And Ethical Philosophy?

    Switzerland. Small, homogenous, locally organized country win no external ambitions, and a universal militia. Cant be done much better.

    https://www.quora.com/Which-country-best-reflects-your-political-and-ethical-philosophy

  • From the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity t

    From the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity toward the republican party over Lincoln’s civil war. This led to the Democratic and Republican parties having both conservative and classical liberal members. Beginning between 76 and 80 this began to change because the democratic party had been captured more aggressively by the radical left and the feminists. Plus the left had used immigration starting in 1964 as a means of achieving the socialist revolution (tearing down the american experiment) through demographic warfare where they had failed by propaganda and pseudoscience (marxism, boazianism, freudianism, cantorian mathematics, and keynesian post marxist economics.) By and large the democratic effort has been effective for large business and finance. So many large business owners that serve the unproductive, laboring, working, and lower middle classes (what he invests in), are better off with policy that increases consumption. Whereas the republican (Aristocratic) is far more concerned with accumulating capital in Human (eugenic), behavioral (normative), institutional (rule of law by tort reciprocity – not rule BY legislation), and territorial than current consumption which consumes human capital (dysgenic, dysnormative, discretionary rather than reciprocal.) So between his AGE, his REGION, and his INTERESTS he votes for conservative democratic policies.