Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • –“Q: What Kind Of Monster Are You?”—

    –“Q: WHAT KIND OF MONSTER ARE YOU?”— Given the opportunity I would make Stalin and Mao look like Father Christmas and Krampus. Noose, pike, guillotine, and pyre. And let the gods sort them out. 😉 (not really, but the shock value in context was priceless).

  • –“Q: What Kind Of Monster Are You?”—

    –“Q: WHAT KIND OF MONSTER ARE YOU?”— Given the opportunity I would make Stalin and Mao look like Father Christmas and Krampus. Noose, pike, guillotine, and pyre. And let the gods sort them out. 😉 (not really, but the shock value in context was priceless).

  • ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and sha

    ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM

    All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and shaming in order to obscure pursuit of political power without earning it through market means. Disapproval, shaming, gossiping, rallying, protesting, and propagandism are means by which the inadequate attempt to reduce the superior sexual, social, economic, and political market value of their superiors. It’s the industrialization through media of politics of pubescent girls, employed by infantile minds unable to ascend into the responsibilities of adulthood.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-02 11:19:00 UTC

  • Accusations Of Racism

    All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and shaming in order to obscure pursuit of political power without earning it through market means. Disapproval, shaming, gossiping, rallying, protesting, and propagandism are means by which the inadequate attempt to reduce the superior sexual, social, economic, and political market value of their superiors. It’s the industrialization through media of politics of pubescent girls, employed by infantile minds unable to ascend into the responsibilities of adulthood.

  • Accusations Of Racism

    All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and shaming in order to obscure pursuit of political power without earning it through market means. Disapproval, shaming, gossiping, rallying, protesting, and propagandism are means by which the inadequate attempt to reduce the superior sexual, social, economic, and political market value of their superiors. It’s the industrialization through media of politics of pubescent girls, employed by infantile minds unable to ascend into the responsibilities of adulthood.

  • My answer to What’s the difference between Marxism and communism?

    My answer to What’s the difference between Marxism and communism? https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-difference-between-Marxism-and-communism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-02 05:19:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/959295113280172034

  • Why Are The Republicans Trying To Destroy Our Justice Department When Most Of The Top Officials Are Republicans. Seems Like The Republicans Are Eating Their Own People?

    Because they allowed the Clinton organization to buy Opposition Research, feed it to the FBI, and attempt to influence the election by sowing falsehoods.

    Because hillary clinton is possibly one of the most corrupt and ideological individuals ever to hold political office, and the Justice Department will not investigate her.

    So we have no russian collusion (and we never will have). And Clintons collude with everyone, in particular, George Soros against the united states on a regular basis.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-the-Republicans-trying-to-destroy-our-Justice-Department-when-most-of-the-top-officials-are-Republicans-Seems-like-the-Republicans-are-eating-their-own-people

  • Why Are The Republicans Trying To Destroy Our Justice Department When Most Of The Top Officials Are Republicans. Seems Like The Republicans Are Eating Their Own People?

    Because they allowed the Clinton organization to buy Opposition Research, feed it to the FBI, and attempt to influence the election by sowing falsehoods.

    Because hillary clinton is possibly one of the most corrupt and ideological individuals ever to hold political office, and the Justice Department will not investigate her.

    So we have no russian collusion (and we never will have). And Clintons collude with everyone, in particular, George Soros against the united states on a regular basis.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-the-Republicans-trying-to-destroy-our-Justice-Department-when-most-of-the-top-officials-are-Republicans-Seems-like-the-Republicans-are-eating-their-own-people

  • Could You Outline The Differences Between Marxism And Communism?

    Technically speaking,

    1) communism consists of equidistribution of goods, services, and labor by purely voluntary means. Communism is achieved through socialism.

    2) socialism is the stage under which the state (priests) centralizes all production, distribution, and trade (cooperation), until it is no longer necessary (heaven) and people merely consume what they need and produce what they need, because they are finally of good character for some reason (they are in heaven).

    Socialism destroys private property, the capacity to produce incentives, and the capacity to produce prices, and as such the ability to organize invention, production, distribution, and trade – and worse it’s dysgenic.

    Social democracy evolved when we understood that it was not possible to control production distribution and trade, but instead, for the state to maximize takings to the point where people continued to work. Economists have tried to calculate this number forever, but they believe in a homogenous population it might be between 50% and 70%. (I think that’s dependent upon a very ignorant populace with very extraordinary wealth that is only possible in periods of global circumstances that allow windfalls (like postwar western civ). ).

    Classical liberalism evolved when we understood that we were wealthy enough due to increasing trade, to prevent the rent seeking of the landed nobility, and to institutionalize the church’s traditional responsibilities by centralizing taxation rather than splitting taxes between the church and the state.

    Anarchism evolved when we understood that other than rule of law, and constitutional monarchy, all roads lead to despotism, corruption, and poverty.

    What we didn’t expect was that it would lead to our genocide.

    SPECTRUM:
    Communism – no property -no possibility

    Socialism – no property – virtual slavery- and centralization of production of commons.

    Social democracy – property but no retention of profits – and central production of commons.

    Classical liberalism – property and retention of profits and very limited central production of commons .

    Anarchism = property and retention of profits but no commons, and no state – an impossibility.

    https://www.quora.com/Could-you-outline-the-differences-between-Marxism-and-Communism

  • Could You Outline The Differences Between Marxism And Communism?

    Technically speaking,

    1) communism consists of equidistribution of goods, services, and labor by purely voluntary means. Communism is achieved through socialism.

    2) socialism is the stage under which the state (priests) centralizes all production, distribution, and trade (cooperation), until it is no longer necessary (heaven) and people merely consume what they need and produce what they need, because they are finally of good character for some reason (they are in heaven).

    Socialism destroys private property, the capacity to produce incentives, and the capacity to produce prices, and as such the ability to organize invention, production, distribution, and trade – and worse it’s dysgenic.

    Social democracy evolved when we understood that it was not possible to control production distribution and trade, but instead, for the state to maximize takings to the point where people continued to work. Economists have tried to calculate this number forever, but they believe in a homogenous population it might be between 50% and 70%. (I think that’s dependent upon a very ignorant populace with very extraordinary wealth that is only possible in periods of global circumstances that allow windfalls (like postwar western civ). ).

    Classical liberalism evolved when we understood that we were wealthy enough due to increasing trade, to prevent the rent seeking of the landed nobility, and to institutionalize the church’s traditional responsibilities by centralizing taxation rather than splitting taxes between the church and the state.

    Anarchism evolved when we understood that other than rule of law, and constitutional monarchy, all roads lead to despotism, corruption, and poverty.

    What we didn’t expect was that it would lead to our genocide.

    SPECTRUM:
    Communism – no property -no possibility

    Socialism – no property – virtual slavery- and centralization of production of commons.

    Social democracy – property but no retention of profits – and central production of commons.

    Classical liberalism – property and retention of profits and very limited central production of commons .

    Anarchism = property and retention of profits but no commons, and no state – an impossibility.

    https://www.quora.com/Could-you-outline-the-differences-between-Marxism-and-Communism