Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • The Fragility Is Obvious

    I knew it was around 90 people. I knew where it was being run from, but I didn’t know it only cost 2M to cause those antifa riots. Every time some idiot tells me that we cant force a revolution, I just want to say “How f–king ignorant are you?” It’s trivial. It’s terribly trivial. And it’s terribly cheap. We have never been this fragile before. Not even leading up to the civil war. Imagine if the fellows in Charlottesville had decided to stand their ground? That would have done it right there. The police cannot do anything. And once that revoluton starts, it just spirals. Why do you think they’ve been planning for it since the Clinton Administration? Because it’s deterministic.

  • The Fragility Is Obvious

    I knew it was around 90 people. I knew where it was being run from, but I didn’t know it only cost 2M to cause those antifa riots. Every time some idiot tells me that we cant force a revolution, I just want to say “How f–king ignorant are you?” It’s trivial. It’s terribly trivial. And it’s terribly cheap. We have never been this fragile before. Not even leading up to the civil war. Imagine if the fellows in Charlottesville had decided to stand their ground? That would have done it right there. The police cannot do anything. And once that revoluton starts, it just spirals. Why do you think they’ve been planning for it since the Clinton Administration? Because it’s deterministic.

  • FRAGILITY IS OBVIOUS I knew it was around 90 people. I knew where it was being r

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/02/18/the-russian-journalist-who-helped-uncover-election-meddling-is-confounded-by-the-mueller-indictments/?utm_term=.ddc87fe923ddTHE FRAGILITY IS OBVIOUS

    I knew it was around 90 people. I knew where it was being run from, but I didn’t know it only cost 2M to cause those antifa riots.

    Every time some idiot tells me that we cant force a revolution, I just want to say “How f–king ignorant are you?” It’s trivial. It’s terribly trivial. And it’s terribly cheap. We have never been this fragile before. Not even leading up to the civil war.

    Imagine if the fellows in Charlottesville had decided to stand their ground?

    That would have done it right there. The police cannot do anything. And once that revoluton starts, it just spirals.

    Why do you think they’ve been planning for it since the Clinton Administration?

    Because it’s deterministic.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-19 13:12:00 UTC

  • RT @realDonaldTrump: The Fake News Media never fails. Hard to ignore this fact f

    RT @realDonaldTrump: The Fake News Media never fails. Hard to ignore this fact from the Vice President of Facebook Ads, Rob Goldman! https:…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-18 03:21:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/965063646673035264

  • Retweeted Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump): The Fake News Media never fails. H

    Retweeted Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump): The Fake News Media never fails. Hard to ignore this fact from the Vice President of Facebook Ads, Rob Goldman! https://t.co/XGC7ynZwYJ

  • The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct

    The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight
  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_43757840

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_43757840

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_437578402228039721_o_10156136631687264.jpg The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRightPaul NunezI like this a lot. I still have a hard time figuring out who originated this scale of hierarchy,though. Almost seems like I’ve heard it from somewhereFeb 17, 2018 9:55pmThe Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 21:41:00 UTC

  • The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct

    The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight

  • The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct

    The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 17:42:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964917943791480832

  • Interference Is For The Purpose Of Justifying Home Rule.

    We do it, the russians have done if for generations, and now the chinese are doing it: which is to cause external instability via propaganda through public intellectuals and activists in order to justify the current order at home. The difference is that surprisingly the russians and especially the chinese are right – and we have been wrong all along. COMMUNISMI IN AMERICA > SAUL ALINSKY > HILLARY CLINTON > BARAK OBAMA All these people were the result of russian interference in our social order…. Just as Perestroika, and the upset in the communist world was the result of our interference.