Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • On the Future of The British Isles (if Not All Scandinavia)

    Economic consumption is, like drugs, or religion, a comforting method of personal, familial, cultural, and political suicide. Some people think about their near term experiences, some about their children’s, some of their peoples long term horizons. (ie: the left, the libertarian, the right.) That which is unique about anglo civilization is incompatible with the faustian bargain that the french-and-german have chosen. The united states will have a second civil war soon because we have resisted returning to the european model of different states, and tried to preserve our inherited british empire in a world where we no longer possess economic and technological asymmetry. Meanwhile Europe, following the USA, assumes that she will achieve american economic and military prowess through unity. This might be possible if divided into protestant, catholic, orthodox civilizations just as american continuity might be possible if divided into Germanic (central), Scotts Irish(southern), Anglo (new england), white “Coastal Islanders” (seattle, portland, san francisco), and Jewish (New york city, Los Angeles). The fact is that the Han, Korean, and Japanese have won the argument: Homogeneity wins over the long term. Ethnicity wins over diversity. Executive government wins over democracy. When I watch the japanese and koreans and now the chinese, I still remember when we were like that – rather than a house, a thousand times divided. The value is not scale but smallness. The only value to scale is war. Small polities produce political, economic, and social equality -because they can. Move capital to people not people to capital. Equilibrate differences in production through trade negotiation. MOST IMPORTANTLY In the coming technological era, when not only phiysical labor but clerical labor is no longer productive, political economic and social asymmetry will increase dramatically, and the returns on popllitical control even more exacerbated than modern medieval and ancient eras. Ergo *the greatest advantage any demographic possesses is homogeneity and a continuously shrinking under class, lower class, and laboring class.* Let each group pay the costs of continuous modernization rather than burdening others. Thi sis the only way to create cooperative rather competing politics and norms. The future is Switzerland or the Levant/India/Brazil/South America. The Anglo Peoples, during the period of expansion, produced a continuous civilization of our own. Britain can either return to her leadership of our people, or continue to decline into a client state of either germany or america. We are not capable of holding the flag any longer. We have been invaded by the third world. And we will now have a civil ar to separate from them.
    Apr 02, 2018 12:16pm
  • On the Future of The British Isles (if Not All Scandinavia)

    Economic consumption is, like drugs, or religion, a comforting method of personal, familial, cultural, and political suicide. Some people think about their near term experiences, some about their children’s, some of their peoples long term horizons. (ie: the left, the libertarian, the right.) That which is unique about anglo civilization is incompatible with the faustian bargain that the french-and-german have chosen. The united states will have a second civil war soon because we have resisted returning to the european model of different states, and tried to preserve our inherited british empire in a world where we no longer possess economic and technological asymmetry. Meanwhile Europe, following the USA, assumes that she will achieve american economic and military prowess through unity. This might be possible if divided into protestant, catholic, orthodox civilizations just as american continuity might be possible if divided into Germanic (central), Scotts Irish(southern), Anglo (new england), white “Coastal Islanders” (seattle, portland, san francisco), and Jewish (New york city, Los Angeles). The fact is that the Han, Korean, and Japanese have won the argument: Homogeneity wins over the long term. Ethnicity wins over diversity. Executive government wins over democracy. When I watch the japanese and koreans and now the chinese, I still remember when we were like that – rather than a house, a thousand times divided. The value is not scale but smallness. The only value to scale is war. Small polities produce political, economic, and social equality -because they can. Move capital to people not people to capital. Equilibrate differences in production through trade negotiation. MOST IMPORTANTLY In the coming technological era, when not only phiysical labor but clerical labor is no longer productive, political economic and social asymmetry will increase dramatically, and the returns on popllitical control even more exacerbated than modern medieval and ancient eras. Ergo *the greatest advantage any demographic possesses is homogeneity and a continuously shrinking under class, lower class, and laboring class.* Let each group pay the costs of continuous modernization rather than burdening others. Thi sis the only way to create cooperative rather competing politics and norms. The future is Switzerland or the Levant/India/Brazil/South America. The Anglo Peoples, during the period of expansion, produced a continuous civilization of our own. Britain can either return to her leadership of our people, or continue to decline into a client state of either germany or america. We are not capable of holding the flag any longer. We have been invaded by the third world. And we will now have a civil ar to separate from them.
    Apr 02, 2018 12:16pm
  • = ARISTOCRACY = MERITOCRACY = EMPIRICISM, AND MARKETS ARE EMPIRICAL AND THE RESU

    https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/CONSERVATISM = ARISTOCRACY = MERITOCRACY = EMPIRICISM, AND MARKETS ARE EMPIRICAL AND THE RESULT IS EUGENIC REPRODUCTION

    1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus.

    2. Conservatism demands human agency over animal impulse.

    familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital.

    3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality.

    4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.

    2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).

    5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families.

    6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.

    7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.

    The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.

    As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.

    1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity

    2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.

    3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.

    4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.

    5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.

    6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**

    DOMESTICATION

    Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.

    CONSERVATIVES

    Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives also are actively suppressed in academy and media.

    This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.)

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.Updated Apr 1, 2018, 2:30 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-01 14:30:00 UTC

  • MURDER RATE OVERTAKES NEW YORK CITY I have been saying this for twenty years: 1

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5566689/London-murder-rate-overtakes-New-York-time-including-11-killings-just-16-days.htmlLONDON MURDER RATE OVERTAKES NEW YORK CITY

    I have been saying this for twenty years:

    1 – diversity of cultures other than importing professionals is disastrous.

    2 – diversity of classes other than professionals is disastrous.

    3 – diversity of any population above 3% will affect you negatively, above 6% will create demands for political competition, and above 10% creates a competition that cannot be satisfied except by separatism.Updated Apr 1, 2018, 10:17 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-01 10:17:00 UTC

  • Mar 31, 2018, 3:10 PM

    http://krcgtv.com/news/local/senate-candidate-from-missouri-calls-for-legalizing-machine-gunsUpdated Mar 31, 2018, 3:10 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-31 15:10:00 UTC

  • It’s time to return to rule. We must accept that our experiment failed. There is

    It’s time to return to rule.

    We must accept that our experiment failed.

    There is no industry more profitable than rule.

    And there is no industry at which we better excel.

    Why do we tolerate being taxed, rather than taxing?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-31 11:40:00 UTC

  • —“What do conservatives mean when they say “liberal elite?”—

    —-”What do conservatives mean when they say “liberal elite?””—-

    1. Virtue signaling class vs virtue demonstrating class
    2. Talking class vs Productive Class
    3. Others Pay For It class vs Pay Your Own Way class.
    4. Cosmopolitan Class (territorial communism) vs Nationalist Class (territorial nationalism)

    Technically speaking, the “Cathedral Complex” consisting of the alliance of the talking class and the underclass: The Academy, The State, The Media (News, Info-tainment, Entertainment, Advertising, Marketing), The Financial Sector. We use the term ‘Cathedral Complex’ to refer to the replacement of the aristocratic, rule of law, commercial, military and industrial complex (The people who do) with the propaganda complex (the people who talk.) When the church failed to reform, the academy replaced the church. It’s not complicated. We don’t have a separation of church and state any longer. We have a state sponsored church of democratic socialist secular humanism spread by marxist pseudoscience and postmodern pseudorationalism, and outright denial of science.

  • —“What do conservatives mean when they say “liberal elite?”—

    —-”What do conservatives mean when they say “liberal elite?””—-

    1. Virtue signaling class vs virtue demonstrating class
    2. Talking class vs Productive Class
    3. Others Pay For It class vs Pay Your Own Way class.
    4. Cosmopolitan Class (territorial communism) vs Nationalist Class (territorial nationalism)

    Technically speaking, the “Cathedral Complex” consisting of the alliance of the talking class and the underclass: The Academy, The State, The Media (News, Info-tainment, Entertainment, Advertising, Marketing), The Financial Sector. We use the term ‘Cathedral Complex’ to refer to the replacement of the aristocratic, rule of law, commercial, military and industrial complex (The people who do) with the propaganda complex (the people who talk.) When the church failed to reform, the academy replaced the church. It’s not complicated. We don’t have a separation of church and state any longer. We have a state sponsored church of democratic socialist secular humanism spread by marxist pseudoscience and postmodern pseudorationalism, and outright denial of science.

  • As far as I know the embassy system has no value any longer other than providing

    As far as I know the embassy system has no value any longer other than providing services to travellers and ex patriots. All embassies are merely vehicles for intelligence gathering, (and in our case, promoting insurrection.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-29 18:58:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/979432659687485448

  • Scotland allows voting as a means of opposing the UK and seeking separatism, not

    Scotland allows voting as a means of opposing the UK and seeking separatism, not because they think young people have any particular wisdom or intelligence – they don’t. Just the opposite. Left = Those Of Low Agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-29 14:48:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/979369717206077440

    Reply addressees: @rileyd11 @IngateSnr @MMFlint

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978389325946613760


    IN REPLY TO:

    @rileyd11

    @IngateSnr @MMFlint Scotland for one. Good job not looking it up.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978389325946613760