Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Natural Conflict Between the Classes of Conservatives

    “I don’t daydream, I do.” “I don’t seek experiences but results.” “I don’t seek like minds, but like doers.” “I don’t seek shared values, but shared incentives and goals.” “I don’t seek pleasure in what I do, I seek profitability which in turn allows me to choose among possible pleasures.” “I don’t seek to follow a plan to a goal, but seek and exploit opportunities discovered in pursuit of goals.” “I don’t seek motivation, I have motivation for the simple reasons of search for novelty and search for competition. If you need motivation you are not suited for leadership.” “I don’t seek to lead, only to perform functions that need performing, when no one better is at hand.” Just as between women and men, women are more dependent upon intuition and men more on reason, some men are likewise dependent upon intuition and some on reason, and some on experience and some on results, and some on fantasy and some on reality. The people who attain, function in, and remain in power positions work harder, work longer, create more relationships, process more information, and calculate more empirically, with fewer anchors to intuition. than their competitors. There is a sort of mental and masculine weakness in the Right that is evident in all right wing thought back to Burke, and before him, throughout the philosophers and theologians, all the way back to plato. The best example of these in modernity are Nietzsche( heroic nonsense) , Kirk (romantic nonsense), Evola (occult nonsense), Where the can be contrasted by Machiavelli, Smith, Hayek, and most recently Pat Buchanan. Now, just as we see the female solipsistic to male autistic spectrum. We see the Fantatisizer <—– observer —– participant —-> Doer spectrum. And careful analysis will show that it’s an introvert (fantasizer) <—-> Extrovert(Doer) spectrum. Some people go from books to searching for problems. Some people from real problems to books. Likewise some people learn for entertainment, and some people learn in furtherance of action. Likewise some people think and act to avoid cooperation with groups, and some people think and act to create organization of groups. Likewise some people seek to act on their terms, while other people act to take advantage of other’s terms. I view the ‘esoteric, occult, literary’ wing of conservatism, man-child aesthetics. Some of us do, others of us follow doers, and others watch doers and followers, and others dream of doing, following, and watching. So that is the class of conservatives: doers searching for tools with which to act, to dreamers searching for fantasies they never can or must act on. There is a class of conservatives who favor the occult, which is an escape from conformity (learning others). There is a class of conservatives who favor the theological (which is to some degree social but conformity is enforced by the theology). There is a class of conservatives who favor literature, which is a proxy for learning from others – usually a substitute for limited personal contacts. There is a class of conservatives who act politically and argumentatively on ‘getting things done’ and ‘enacting change’ by ‘possible means’. All this spectrum describes is social immaturity and undesirability to social maturity and desirability. So when someone says his preferred method of understanding conservatism he is telling you a great deal about his desirability as a cooperative actor.
    May 28, 2018 4:49pm

  • nope. we have evidence in ukraine. gangsterism

    nope. we have evidence in ukraine. gangsterism.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-28 17:35:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001155042685091840

    Reply addressees: @absolutelysubv

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001132377509384192

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001132377509384192

  • NATURAL CONFLICT BETWEEN THE CLASSES OF CONSERVATIVES “I don’t daydream, I do.”

    NATURAL CONFLICT BETWEEN THE CLASSES OF CONSERVATIVES

    “I don’t daydream, I do.”

    “I don’t seek experiences but results.”

    “I don’t seek like minds, but like doers.”

    “I don’t seek shared values, but shared incentives and goals.”

    “I don’t seek pleasure in what I do, I seek profitability which in turn allows me to choose among possible pleasures.”

    “I don’t seek to follow a plan to a goal, but seek and exploit opportunities discovered in pursuit of goals.”

    “I don’t seek motivation, I have motivation for the simple reasons of search for novelty and search for competition. If you need motivation you are not suited for leadership.”

    “I don’t seek to lead, only to perform functions that need performing, when no one better is at hand.”

    Just as between women and men, women are more dependent upon intuition and men more on reason, some men are likewise dependent upon intuition and some on reason, and some on experience and some on results, and some on fantasy and some on reality.

    The people who attain, function in, and remain in power positions work harder, work longer, create more relationships, process more information, and calculate more empirically, with fewer anchors to intuition. than their competitors.

    There is a sort of mental and masculine weakness in the Right that is evident in all right wing thought back to Burke, and before him, throughout the philosophers and theologians, all the way back to plato.

    The best example of these in modernity are Nietzsche( heroic nonsense) , Kirk (romantic nonsense), Evola (occult nonsense), Where the can be contrasted by Machiavelli, Smith, Hayek, and most recently Pat Buchanan.

    Now, just as we see the female solipsistic to male autistic spectrum. We see the Fantatisizer <—– observer —– participant —-> Doer spectrum. And careful analysis will show that it’s an introvert (fantasizer) <—-> Extrovert(Doer) spectrum.

    Some people go from books to searching for problems. Some people from real problems to books. Likewise some people learn for entertainment, and some people learn in furtherance of action. Likewise some people think and act to avoid cooperation with groups, and some people think and act to create organization of groups. Likewise some people seek to act on their terms, while other people act to take advantage of other’s terms.

    I view the ‘esoteric, occult, literary’ wing of conservatism, man-child aesthetics. Some of us do, others of us follow doers, and others watch doers and followers, and others dream of doing, following, and watching.

    So that is the class of conservatives: doers searching for tools with which to act, to dreamers searching for fantasies they never can or must act on.

    There is a class of conservatives who favor the occult, which is an escape from conformity (learning others).

    There is a class of conservatives who favor the theological (which is to some degree social but conformity is enforced by the theology).

    There is a class of conservatives who favor literature, which is a proxy for learning from others – usually a substitute for limited personal contacts.

    There is a class of conservatives who act politically and argumentatively on ‘getting things done’ and ‘enacting change’ by ‘possible means’.

    All this spectrum describes is social immaturity and undesirability to social maturity and desirability.

    So when someone says his preferred method of understanding conservatism he is telling you a great deal about his desirability as a cooperative actor.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-28 16:49:00 UTC

  • The end result of the british goverment is deterministically caretaker bolshevis

    The end result of the british goverment is deterministically caretaker bolshevism. The Russian empire needed a means of homogenous conquest. British government after losing the empire has taken on a means of conquest – of its own people. UK=SOVIETS V2

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-28 16:47:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD 1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason

    CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD

    1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. Conservatism is familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital.

    2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).

    3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality.

    4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.

    5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families.

    6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.

    7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.

    The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.

    As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.

    1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity

    2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.

    3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.

    4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.

    5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.

    6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**

    DOMESTICATION

    Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-28 10:37:00 UTC

  • The Hierarchy of Revolutionary Arguments

      Think of revolutionary arguments as a pyramid: – The theory (strategy) – The Incentives (science) of that strategy – The law (constitution) reflecting those incentives – The generational institutions (“government”) utilizing those incentives – The Intergenerational institutions (“education, religion”) retaining the strategy, incentives, law, and institutions). – The benefits for members (“rewards”) produced by those incentives, law, and institutions. – The motivations (“agitations”) that they produce by those what would obtain those benefits. – The Plan (“revolution”) that provides the opportunity for those whose motivations are sufficient to act – to do so. ||> Intellectuals > operators > citizens > agitators, revolutionaries: Arguments(solutions) for each. And let the weight of self interest drive the revolution – just like the enlightenment did and the eastern conquest of the western empire by levantine christianity did. I start at the top and work down. Most people start at the bottom and never make it past motivations. I expect others to take the ideas and communicate the benefits, inspire the motivations, and to organize the revolution according to plans that are fairly tactical. And I expect to pay a pretty high price for doing all of this work, and I”m ok with it. May 26, 2018 10:31am

  • The Hierarchy of Revolutionary Arguments

      Think of revolutionary arguments as a pyramid: – The theory (strategy) – The Incentives (science) of that strategy – The law (constitution) reflecting those incentives – The generational institutions (“government”) utilizing those incentives – The Intergenerational institutions (“education, religion”) retaining the strategy, incentives, law, and institutions). – The benefits for members (“rewards”) produced by those incentives, law, and institutions. – The motivations (“agitations”) that they produce by those what would obtain those benefits. – The Plan (“revolution”) that provides the opportunity for those whose motivations are sufficient to act – to do so. ||> Intellectuals > operators > citizens > agitators, revolutionaries: Arguments(solutions) for each. And let the weight of self interest drive the revolution – just like the enlightenment did and the eastern conquest of the western empire by levantine christianity did. I start at the top and work down. Most people start at the bottom and never make it past motivations. I expect others to take the ideas and communicate the benefits, inspire the motivations, and to organize the revolution according to plans that are fairly tactical. And I expect to pay a pretty high price for doing all of this work, and I”m ok with it. May 26, 2018 10:31am

  • VIA GATTO: LIBERTY REQUIRES DEADLY WEAPONS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-IbGfdlHlsQUIGLEY VIA GATTO: LIBERTY REQUIRES DEADLY WEAPONS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-IbGfdlHls

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 12:39:00 UTC

  • VIA GATTO: LIBERTY REQUIRES DEADLY WEAPONS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-IbGfdlHlsQUIGLEY VIA GATTO: LIBERTY REQUIRES DEADLY WEAPONS

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 12:39:00 UTC

  • THE HIERARCHY OF REVOLUTIONARY ARGUMENTS Think of revolutionary arguments as a p

    THE HIERARCHY OF REVOLUTIONARY ARGUMENTS

    Think of revolutionary arguments as a pyramid:

    – The theory (strategy)

    – The Incentives (science) of that strategy

    – The law (constitution) reflecting those incentives

    – The generational institutions (“government”) utilizing those incentives

    – The Intergenerational institutions (“education, religion”) retaining the strategy, incentives, law, and institutions).

    – The benefits for members (“rewards”) produced by those incentives, law, and institutions.

    – The motivations (“agitations”) that they produce by those what would obtain those benefits.

    – The Plan (“revolution”) that provides the opportunity for those whose motivations are sufficient to act – to do so.

    ||> Intellectuals > operators > citizens > agitators, revolutionaries: Arguments(solutions) for each. And let the weight of self interest drive the revolution – just like the enlightenment did and the eastern conquest of the western empire by levantine christianity did.

    I start at the top and work down. Most people start at the bottom and never make it past motivations.

    I expect others to take the ideas and communicate the benefits, inspire the motivations, and to organize the revolution according to plans that are fairly tactical.

    And I expect to pay a pretty high price for doing all of this work, and I”m ok with it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 10:31:00 UTC