Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

IS THE WEST NOW THE WORLD’S ENEMY?
(Sort of. But that’s throwing the baby out with the bathwater)

–“Is Dugin correct that the US/West has become the “common enemy” of mankind in its desire to dilute and integrate the cultures and races of the world into one homogenizing “American liberal way of life”– @dr_duchesne

Yes the west has become the enemy, though I would argue, and I think successfully, that the west is merely incompetent at resisting the combination of the introduction of women into polity, economy, academy, and bureaucracy, in combination with the postwar migration of the jewish thought leadership to the west and with their march through the institutions of cultural production, using the transformation of the failed class marxism to the sequence of cultural marxist, race marxist, sex marxist (anti-male feminism), truth marxist (postmodernism), educational marxist, ‘woke’ sequence.

There isn’t a problem with western civ so much as a vulnerability in western civ because of our success at developing a high trust society and it’s foolish optimism behond nationalism to christian universalism.w

Instead, e have a relatively simple problem of obtaining the political power sufficient to outlaw female antisocial behavior in all its forms including the marxist sequence, as thoroughly as we have the masculine. And perhaps, in addition to restore male responsibility to regulate the feminine we may need to ‘unregulate’ the male behavior sufficiently to restore civilization.

Until you grasp that the Female > Feminine > Jewish> Abrahamic > Marxist-to-woke sequence is just the feminine strategy of undermining dominant males through social construction of false promises that bait the tendency of the feminine to embrace magical thinking, whenever that magical thinking will reduce responsibility for settling conflict, instead of submitting to whatever conflict exists as long as it doesn’t demand responsibiilty for the commons of them.

This may seem disconnected to you but it’s as concree as phsyics, chemistry or biology.

Our ancestors, in particular the victorians, tried to rehabilitate the reputation of women, that both the church, women in the family, the men regulating the family, and the society contained the “gossiping shrilling and breaking of the kings peace with their selfishness and pettiness.” But pandora always has her way if given the opportuntiy, just as will Pan and Loki without regulation.

We have a women problem, and a problem of the men who pander to them or gain influence and affluence by pandering to them.

Is this a conclusion I am pleased with?Just the opposite. I love women and court the feminine. But that is a personal vlaue not a political one. Politically, women are the destroyaers of worlds. THis is why there are no female polities and never have been. Matrilineal maybe if the men have been decimated by war. But alwas Paternal.

It’s evolutionarily impossible otherwise. The feminine intuition is incapable of systematizing at scale and self regulation necessary for bearing the burden of the risk of policing the comons against themselves, children, and men of low character.