Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty over the will or ability of any and all competitors. Liberty by request – because a group does not have enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty, but can purchase liberty with fees (taxes). Freedom by permission – because an individual has too little violence to produce sovereignty, and too little violence to request liberty, but can purchase freedom through non-interference and payment of fees (taxes). Sovereignty is produced as a commons(Polity/Executive). Liberty is produced as a commons(Business/Managerial). Freedom is given to produce commons (Trades/Labor). Serfdom is imposed to produce commons at cost(Labor). Slavery is imposed to produce commons at high cost(labor). Whether one demonstrates a condition of Sovereignty(Aristocracy: Polity/Territory), Liberty(Citizen : capital), or freedom (Freeman: body), the production of such must be constructed top down: from commons to degree of property ownership (responsibility) since while it is most productive to have the greatest distribution of property, it is also most productive to limit the distribution of property to those who produce commons. Since productivity determines the ability for a polity to compete for sovereignty and territory the distribution of property therefore productivity and responsibility is determined by competitive necessity versus the abilities of the population. Hence the need for growth to defeat the red queen of technology and productivity, against men, and to defeat the red queen of evolution (or devolution, or extinction).
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Rings of Influence,
Bill Joslin A model for this could be described as concentric rings of influence, centering on the individual and radiating out into the commons based on which domain one acts as judge-of-last-resort. Am I judge-of-last-resort for my mind (clarity of intention) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my body (voluntary intentional action) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my household (do I direct my domestic life) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my livelihood (do I direct my means of survival) Am I judge-of-last-resort which secures (ensures) my property-en-toto Am I judge-of-last-resort in the intergenerational shared commons (do I direct my place in history) For each of those questions, if there is another person to which you are beholden then the answer is no. Everyman a king of his household Everyman a rifleman Everyman a sheriff Everyman a judge ….in opportunity only, secured by demonstrations of ability. Cult of non-submission – cultivation of autonomy -
Rings of Influence,
Bill Joslin A model for this could be described as concentric rings of influence, centering on the individual and radiating out into the commons based on which domain one acts as judge-of-last-resort. Am I judge-of-last-resort for my mind (clarity of intention) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my body (voluntary intentional action) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my household (do I direct my domestic life) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my livelihood (do I direct my means of survival) Am I judge-of-last-resort which secures (ensures) my property-en-toto Am I judge-of-last-resort in the intergenerational shared commons (do I direct my place in history) For each of those questions, if there is another person to which you are beholden then the answer is no. Everyman a king of his household Everyman a rifleman Everyman a sheriff Everyman a judge ….in opportunity only, secured by demonstrations of ability. Cult of non-submission – cultivation of autonomy -
Don’t congratulate yourself on circumstance.
Let me help you both: 1) We produce the social orders we can afford to produce. 2) We have the values we can afford to have in that social order. 3) We have the social orders and values that our demographics allow us to have. It’s physics and economics. Don’t congratulate yourself on circumstance.
-
One of Propertarianism’s Cures for Iq Shredding
One of the cures for “IQ Shredding” is to follow the postwar german example, of limiting housing in cities to those for families. So that the benefits of low cost of commons (density) are only available to those who produce generations. This is a very simple alternative. In other words, today, large organizations can use stock market capital, to bring young people to cities, profit from them, at the expense of IQ by way of reproductive rates. When, as whites and jews have shown us, the objective must always be to do the opposite: distribute reproduction upwards. Combined with one-child policy for the underclasses this will work by a means regularly unconscionable to libertines: redistribution of opportunity costs to those that pay the costs of intergenerational reproduction.
https://blog.jim.com/economics/the-cure-for-iq-shredders/THE CURE FOR “IQ SHREDDERS” (CITIES) from Jim’s Blog Our best hopes for a high tech future, for avoiding a dark age, are consuming the genes needed for a high tech future. Smart people go to Hong Kong and Singapore and fail to reproduce. Singapore has taken numerous measures, similar to those of the Nazis and Emperor Augustus, to improve fertility, which will doubtless be as ineffectual as those of the Nazis and Emperor Augustus. Just as the cure for Chinese poverty was to import the economic laws and customs of Hong Kong into Shanghai, the cure for Singaporean infertility is to import the marital laws and customs of Timor Leste, where women cannot own property, because they are wards of their parents until they become wards of their husbands. Dubai already has a system where low status expat workers are effectively wards of their employers. This typically applies to Indian construction workers (who are all male and unaccompanied by their wives and families) and Filipino “maids”, who are all female and normally single when they arrive. If an employee’s sponsor is her employer, the employee is effectively a ward of the employer. A higher status employee usually has the free zone authority is his sponsor, not his employer, even though his employer asked the free zone to sponsor the employee so the process looks very similar. An employee sponsored by her employer normally resides in accommodation provided by the employer. The employee cannot change jobs without her employers permission. If the employer dismisses the maid, he normally cancels her visa, her bank accounts, her phone, and gives her a ticket back to her homeland. He has to give her a ticket out, because he paid a deposit to obtain her work visa, and because if she fails to leave by her employer’s fault, the employer is in trouble. If the employer cancels his employees visa, he is supposed to provide the employee with the means to leave. Often however, she fails to show up by her fault, in which case the employer still loses his deposit, so if he can, he drags her off to the airport whether she will or not. Male Indian construction workers seldom do a run. If fired, they leave without any drama. “Maids” frequently do a run and fail to show up at the airport, because the usual cause of a falling out with her employer is raging hormones. If she does a run, her phone stops working, her credit cards stop working, her bank account stops working and if she does not withdraw any money in her bank account in a timely fashion, she loses the money. She cannot get a new phone, bank account or legal accommodation, and is subject to a large fine for every day she fails to show up. If caught, and unable to pay the fine, goes to jail for considerable time, then is sent out of the country and forbidden ever to return. -
One of Propertarianism’s Cures for Iq Shredding
One of the cures for “IQ Shredding” is to follow the postwar german example, of limiting housing in cities to those for families. So that the benefits of low cost of commons (density) are only available to those who produce generations. This is a very simple alternative. In other words, today, large organizations can use stock market capital, to bring young people to cities, profit from them, at the expense of IQ by way of reproductive rates. When, as whites and jews have shown us, the objective must always be to do the opposite: distribute reproduction upwards. Combined with one-child policy for the underclasses this will work by a means regularly unconscionable to libertines: redistribution of opportunity costs to those that pay the costs of intergenerational reproduction.
https://blog.jim.com/economics/the-cure-for-iq-shredders/THE CURE FOR “IQ SHREDDERS” (CITIES) from Jim’s Blog Our best hopes for a high tech future, for avoiding a dark age, are consuming the genes needed for a high tech future. Smart people go to Hong Kong and Singapore and fail to reproduce. Singapore has taken numerous measures, similar to those of the Nazis and Emperor Augustus, to improve fertility, which will doubtless be as ineffectual as those of the Nazis and Emperor Augustus. Just as the cure for Chinese poverty was to import the economic laws and customs of Hong Kong into Shanghai, the cure for Singaporean infertility is to import the marital laws and customs of Timor Leste, where women cannot own property, because they are wards of their parents until they become wards of their husbands. Dubai already has a system where low status expat workers are effectively wards of their employers. This typically applies to Indian construction workers (who are all male and unaccompanied by their wives and families) and Filipino “maids”, who are all female and normally single when they arrive. If an employee’s sponsor is her employer, the employee is effectively a ward of the employer. A higher status employee usually has the free zone authority is his sponsor, not his employer, even though his employer asked the free zone to sponsor the employee so the process looks very similar. An employee sponsored by her employer normally resides in accommodation provided by the employer. The employee cannot change jobs without her employers permission. If the employer dismisses the maid, he normally cancels her visa, her bank accounts, her phone, and gives her a ticket back to her homeland. He has to give her a ticket out, because he paid a deposit to obtain her work visa, and because if she fails to leave by her employer’s fault, the employer is in trouble. If the employer cancels his employees visa, he is supposed to provide the employee with the means to leave. Often however, she fails to show up by her fault, in which case the employer still loses his deposit, so if he can, he drags her off to the airport whether she will or not. Male Indian construction workers seldom do a run. If fired, they leave without any drama. “Maids” frequently do a run and fail to show up at the airport, because the usual cause of a falling out with her employer is raging hormones. If she does a run, her phone stops working, her credit cards stop working, her bank account stops working and if she does not withdraw any money in her bank account in a timely fashion, she loses the money. She cannot get a new phone, bank account or legal accommodation, and is subject to a large fine for every day she fails to show up. If caught, and unable to pay the fine, goes to jail for considerable time, then is sent out of the country and forbidden ever to return. -
The Female Political Instinct Is to Marry the State to Escape the Costs of Male Maintenance.
—“That was the whole point all the time: destroy the nuclear family, replace the father with the State.”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas The female political instinct is to marry the state to escape the costs of male maintenance. Totally logical … IF YOU LET IT HAPPEN.
-
The Female Political Instinct Is to Marry the State to Escape the Costs of Male Maintenance.
—“That was the whole point all the time: destroy the nuclear family, replace the father with the State.”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas The female political instinct is to marry the state to escape the costs of male maintenance. Totally logical … IF YOU LET IT HAPPEN.
-
“That was the whole point all the time: destroy the nuclear family, replace the
—“That was the whole point all the time: destroy the nuclear family, replace the father with the State.”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas
The female political instinct is to marry the state to escape the costs of male maintenance.
Totally logical … IF YOU LET IT HAPPEN.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 19:16:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1004441941319274497
-
“People disconnected from their nuclear and extended family need a replacement f
—“People disconnected from their nuclear and extended family need a replacement for the lack of insurance they have created by the disconnection. Hence the State becomes their parents and marriage.”—Greg Hamilton
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 17:50:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1004420385880858624