Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • #Conservative #Libertarian #NRx

    https://t.co/te8UnaW2gk#NewRight #Conservative #Libertarian #NRx https://t.co/te8UnaW2gk


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 10:01:00 UTC

  • #Conservative #Libertarian #NRx

    https://t.co/te8UnaW2gk#NewRight #Conservative #Libertarian #NRx


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 10:01:00 UTC

  • IT’S OK TO BE MEN OF INACTION, AS LONG AS YOU STAY OUT OF THE WAY –“Lobertarian

    IT’S OK TO BE MEN OF INACTION, AS LONG AS YOU STAY OUT OF THE WAY

    –“Lobertarianism is lolberism cloaked in big brain individualism. It’s ok to be men of inaction as long as it doesn’t directly affect you, and if it does, retaliation cannot affect anyone else. It’s an outspoken version of pacifism.”—David Parker


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 09:54:00 UTC

  • by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Natio

    by Vincent Deschenes

    1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Nations.

    Lolbertarianism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of nations.

    2. Globalism: Open borders and mass immigration.

    Lolbertarianism: Open borders and mass immigration.

    3. Globalism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist.

    Lolbertarianism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist.

    4. Globalism: Multiculturalism, multi-racialism is strength.

    Lolbertarianism: Multiculturalism/multi-racialism is strength.

    Conclusion.

    Radical individualism may serve to further the advancement of globalism, it is controlled opposition.

    This is not an issue where a middle ground exists, either you’re opposed to Globalism or you’re not, either you don’t recognize the importance of nations or you do, either you wish to preserve nations or you don’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 09:04:00 UTC

  • TRUMP’S RETURN TO A MULTI-POLAR WORLD by Bill Joslin Under a unipolar world (US

    TRUMP’S RETURN TO A MULTI-POLAR WORLD

    by Bill Joslin

    Under a unipolar world (US exceptionalism) satellite states, it as I call them vassal states, play an important role. Vassals are proxies for US to do what the US can’t directly.

    Inversely vassals play a role for secondary players for the same reason.

    Trump is forcing a return to a multi-variable world (which is what Putin and China have been advocating – mutlipilar world under international law – internationalist opposed to globalists.

    So in one hand trump is saying to the vassals “we don’t need you anymore, it cost more to retain you then the benefits you proivde.

    And the rest try to poise themselves a soveriegn nations on equal footing when they have never been anything but vassals at the heel of a king – they’ve never really been soveriegn – only had the pretense of it in exchange for fealty to the empire (for Canada, to England first than a shift to the US in 1957 – for the rest under NATO etc).

    Here’s the thing – many nations.may fall in standard of living, but in exchange gain an opportunity to actually be soveriegn nations operating in reality versus vassal states living in pretense.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:42:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGIN OF TRUMP’S NEGOTIATING STRATEGY: COLD WAR HOSTILE NEGOTIATIONS Again,

    THE ORIGIN OF TRUMP’S NEGOTIATING STRATEGY: COLD WAR HOSTILE NEGOTIATIONS

    Again, Trump takes the WORST POSSIBLE NUMBER and states it, thereby FORCING THE PRESSS TO CORRECT HIM, and as a consequence USING THE PRESS to promote his agenda.

    Trump plays the press like a fiddle.

    He did this same strategy all through the campaign and has continued it all through his presidency, and he owns the dialog because of it.

    He knows exactly what he is doing which is why he is such an amazing hostile negotiator. He always forces the other side to own the facts, and in doing so explain their position.

    I mean, you can actually study these techniques (I have) but he’s a master of them.

    If you study how cold war intelligence organizations conducted hostile negotiations, that’s where trump took his lessons.

    Read how Arafat negotiated. Hostile. Brilliant.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:20:00 UTC

  • THE WEST’S STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYT

    THE WEST’S STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYTHING. Trump is demanding truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity and markets in everything. The outcome of constructing only FAIR DEALS produces western civilization, and the balance of powers. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 14:04:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1006175276622143488

  • THE WEST’S STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYT

    THE WEST’S STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYTHING. Trump is demanding truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity and markets in everything. The outcome of constructing only FAIR DEALS produces western civilization, and the balance of powers. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 10:04:00 UTC

  • THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN

    THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYTHING. Trump is demanding truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity and markets in everything. The outcome of simply constructing only fair deals produces western civilization. And the balance of powers.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 10:03:00 UTC

  • Dugin’s Book Says:

    DUGIN’S BOOK SAYS: The book declares that “the battle for the world rule of [ethnic] Russians” has not ended and Russia remains “the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution”. The Eurasian Empire will be constructed “on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us.“[9] Military operations play relatively little role. The textbook believes in a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded by the Russian special services. The operations should be assisted by a tough, hard-headed utilization of Russia’s gas, oil, and natural resources to bully and pressure other countries.[9] The book states that “the maximum task [of the future] is the ‘Finlandization’ of all of Europe”.[9] In Europe: Germany should be offered the de facto political dominance over most Protestant and Catholic states located within Central and Eastern Europe. Kaliningrad oblast could be given back to Germany. The book uses the term “Moscow–Berlin axis”.[9] France should be encouraged to form a “Franco–German bloc” with Germany. Both countries have a “firm anti-Atlanticist tradition”.[9] The United Kingdom should be cut off from Europe.[9] Finland should be absorbed into Russia. Southern Finland will be combined with the Republic of Karelia and northern Finland will be “donated to Murmansk Oblast”.[9] Estonia should be given to Germany’s sphere of influence.[9] Latvia and Lithuania should be given a “special status” in the Eurasian-Russian sphere.[9] Poland should be granted a “special status” in the Eurasian sphere.[9] Romania, Macedonia, “Serbian Bosnia” and Greece – “Orthodox collectivist East” – will unite with “Moscow the Third Rome” and reject the “rational-individualistic West”.[9] Ukraine should be annexed by Russia because “Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics”. Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is cordon sanitaire, which would be inadmissible.[9] In the Middle East and Central Asia: The book stresses the “continental Russian–Islamic alliance” which lies “at the foundation of anti-Atlanticist strategy”. The alliance is based on the “traditional character of Russian and Islamic civilization”. Iran is a key ally. The book uses the term “Moscow–Tehran axis”.[9] Armenia has a special role: It will serve as a “strategic base,” and it is necessary to create “the [subsidiary] axis Moscow-Erevan-Teheran”. Armenians “are an Aryan people … [like] the Iranians and the Kurds”.[9] Azerbaijan could be “split up” or given to Iran.[9] Georgia should be dismembered. Abkhazia and “United Ossetia” (which includes Georgia’s South Ossetia) will be incorporated into Russia. Georgia’s independent policies are unacceptable.[9] Russia needs to create “geopolitical shocks” within Turkey. These can be achieved by employing Kurds, Armenians and other minorities.[9] The book regards the Caucasus as a Russian territory, including “the eastern and northern shores of the Caspian (the territories of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan)” and Central Asia (mentioning Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan).[9] In Asia: China, which represents a danger to Russia, “must, to the maximum degree possible, be dismantled”. Dugin suggests that Russia start by taking Tibet–Xinjiang–Mongolia–Manchuria as a security belt.[1] Russia should offer China help “in a southern direction – Indochina (except Vietnam), the Philippines, Indonesia, Australia” as geopolitical compensation.[9] Russia should manipulate Japanese politics by offering the Kuril Islands to Japan and provoking anti-Americanism.[9] Mongolia should be absorbed into Eurasia-Russia.[9] The book emphasizes that Russia must spread Anti-Americanism everywhere: “the main ‘scapegoat’ will be precisely the U.S.” In the United States: Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism, for instance, provoke “Afro-American racists”. Russia should “introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics”.[9] The Eurasian Project could be expanded to South and Central America.[9]