Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Untitled

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/06/25/steve-king-america-civil-war/733226002/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-26 16:36:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION WITH VIOLENCE AND POLITICAL INTENT. WE DID IT WITH A SELF ORGANIZING MARKET – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THAT DIFFERENCE?

    Their ‘Cultural Revolution’ involved granting liberal tolerance to defectors, then rounding them up and brutally killing them in the streets. A uniquely Chinese degree of practical political violence. Their difference in value of individual human life, and intra-cultural trust is evident. A difference we have only attributed to competitive outsiders and religious defectors.

    Our ‘Cultural Revolution’ (means of identifying defectors, and those with in-group defects) is a free market where the defectors and defective are self-identifying by self-organizing.

    Where the Chinese exterminated to maintain homogeneity, we can merely politically separate.

    *Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.*

    Look at the current crisis – genocide against our people – as an opportunity to voluntarily exit from the gene pool those costly genes that impede our transcendence into Overmen (gods).

    Where we could struggle for another thousand years or more to produce a eugenic meritocratic, aristocratic, high trust, high commons, order – we can instead, radically separate not only others, but our own, and make a rapid leap in evolutionary progress.

    Revel in our time. Few men have the opportunity to leave a mark not only on history – but on the transcendence of mankind.

    This is the greatest opportunity since the failed construction of Roman Walls. Again – the Chinese succeeded where we have failed; for the simple reason that they use extraordinary violence to produce a hierarchical monopoly, where we use the violence necessary to produce a market of voluntary cooperation.

    This insight helps us understand not just the Chinese method, but how our method differs, and where it is stronger (innovation and velocity) and where it is weaker (markets make one vulnerable to greed that consumes genetic, cultural, institutional, behavioral, and knowledge capital.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-26 11:34:01 UTC

  • “Politics is outsourcing and only to be used when common ground is obtainable. F

    —“Politics is outsourcing and only to be used when common ground is obtainable. For anything that really matters, DIY. Nobody ever voted to start a revolution.”– Steve Pender


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-25 21:10:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1011356102158626817

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Politics is outsourcing and only to be us

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Politics is outsourcing and only to be used when common ground is obtainable. For anything that really matters, DIY. Nobody ever voted to start a revolution.”– Steve Pender


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-25 21:10:46 UTC

  • “Politics is outsourcing and only to be used when common ground is obtainable. F

    —“Politics is outsourcing and only to be used when common ground is obtainable. For anything that really matters, DIY. Nobody ever voted to start a revolution.”– Steve Pender


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-25 17:10:00 UTC

  • Secession Lets Us Exit Our In-Group Leftists (traitors)

    There are plenty of traitors among us. Secession allows us to separate from in-group opponents and out-group opponents as well. Think of it this way: we can spend time, effort, and resources, to regulate, and another thousand years trying to breed out their behavior – or we can simply leave them behind and let them outbreed and be lost among the out-groups. When you make our struggle against colors alone you miss the opportunity that men of all other colors have the same problem we do: eliminating parasites.

  • Secession Lets Us Exit Our In-Group Leftists (traitors)

    There are plenty of traitors among us. Secession allows us to separate from in-group opponents and out-group opponents as well. Think of it this way: we can spend time, effort, and resources, to regulate, and another thousand years trying to breed out their behavior – or we can simply leave them behind and let them outbreed and be lost among the out-groups. When you make our struggle against colors alone you miss the opportunity that men of all other colors have the same problem we do: eliminating parasites.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. SECESSION LETS US EXIT OUR IN-GROUP LEFTISTS

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    SECESSION LETS US EXIT OUR IN-GROUP LEFTISTS (TRAITORS)

    There are plenty of traitors among us. Secession allows us to separate from in-group opponents and out-group opponents as well.

    Think of it this way: we can spend time, effort, and resources, to regulate, and another thousand years trying to breed out their behavior – or we can simply leave them behind and let them outbreed and be lost among the out-groups.

    When you make our struggle against colors alone you miss the opportunity that men of all other colors have the same problem we do: eliminating parasites.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 14:59:02 UTC

  • SECESSION LETS US EXIT OUR IN-GROUP LEFTISTS (TRAITORS) There are plenty of trai

    SECESSION LETS US EXIT OUR IN-GROUP LEFTISTS (TRAITORS)

    There are plenty of traitors among us. Secession allows us to separate from in-group opponents and out-group opponents as well.

    Think of it this way: we can spend time, effort, and resources, to regulate, and another thousand years trying to breed out their behavior – or we can simply leave them behind and let them outbreed and be lost among the out-groups.

    When you make our struggle against colors alone you miss the opportunity that men of all other colors have the same problem we do: eliminating parasites.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 10:59:00 UTC

  • The Fallacy of Liberal Academic Achievement

    —“What I always tell people who cite more “educational achievement” among liberals, besides what this article said about how universities are really indoctrination centers, is that there is a repolarization at the top that mirrors the 50/50 split amongst the general population. Intelligence is a predictor of leftist leanings until you hit the the top one or two percent. “They don’t know what they don’t know” is basically another way of saying “A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.” They get to the point of questioning preconceived notions, realizing they’re not wholly rational, but not even scratching the surface of why we developed those instincts to begin with.”– Brian McQuiston “…Not questioning why we developed those instincts to begin with…” or why a central tenet of western and eastern civilization is the warning by Icarus against hubris. Why? It counters (a) that idealism and reason can somehow compete with a market for demonstrated results, and (b) that we are unequal in every possible way and that markets are the only means of calculating coincidences of wants and needs, and (c) that because of “b”, many people are dead weight or deleterious to the group as a whole.