Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • The problem with our current elite was the transition between the anglo upper cl

    The problem with our current elite was the transition between the anglo upper classes and their loyalty to one another and the country and constitution, and the requirement for that loyalty plus demonstrated competency in either the mlitary or industry to hold a position, with credentialists whoh were educated in the postwar era by the jewish-marxist takeover of the institutions under theh false promise that this would produce a professional bureaucracy as did Germany without recognizing that the german professional bureaucracy was populated by people with military experience, under a monarchy, and under the intolerance for such behavior under a martial monarchy.

    Reply addressees: @MoyeJoshua267 @DustinofApollon @radiofreenw

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 22:00:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749190320078663680

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749169818027376950

  • We are not in any way attempting such a thing. And even if we were we would not

    We are not in any way attempting such a thing. And even if we were we would not seek to engage in treason against our people and our constitution – only to defend our people and restore and expand our constitution so it is no longer vulnerable to this means of sedition.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 19:29:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749152170866245874

    Reply addressees: @CarmelloM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749150974831210519

  • POPULAR QUOTES BY PATTON ON THE RUSSIANS The west always ends wars too early bec

    POPULAR QUOTES BY PATTON ON THE RUSSIANS
    The west always ends wars too early because we practice the western way of war, of wanting to restore cooperation and trade after the war, and limit animosity between the people as well as the rulers. That’s not the russian, asian or islamic way of war.

    –“The difficulty in understanding the Russian is that we do not take cognizance of the fact that he is not a European, but an Asiatic, and therefore thinks deviously. We can no more understand a Russian than a Chinese or a Japanese, and from what I have seen of them, I have no particular desire to understand them except to ascertain how much lead or iron it takes to kill them. In addition to his other amiable characteristics, the Russian has no regard for human life and they are all out sons-of-(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)es, barbarians, and chronic drunks.”–

    –“The Russians are mongols. They are Slavs and a lot of them used to be ruled by ancient Byzantium. From Genghis Kahn to Stalin. They have not changed. They never will and we will never learn, at least , not until it is too late.”–

    “I understand the situation. Their [the Soviet] supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof–that’s their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let’s not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!”

    “If it should be necessary for us fight the Russians, the sooner we do it, the better. We could have arrived sooner but for the fact if one flies over Russian occupied territory they shoot at you .Nice friends.”

    “If we have to fight them , now is the time. From now on , we will get weaker and they will get stronger.”

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 18:50:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749142455813804032

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749138058153464227

  • This is why patton said what he did about the russian people

    This is why patton said what he did about the russian people. https://twitter.com/P_Kallioniemi/status/1748642384903041072

  • “I OBEY, BUT I DONT COMPLY” Our team supports this message. See @RewiretheWest

    “I OBEY, BUT I DONT COMPLY”
    Our team supports this message.
    See @RewiretheWest https://twitter.com/SirEvanAmato/status/1748005672388620366

  • It amazes me that given the warm civil war that is brewing over the overreach of

    It amazes me that given the warm civil war that is brewing over the overreach of the federal government that people don’t expect that heroic leadership by extraordinary personalities, would attract half of the population’s attention, in the hope that he will save them from that overreach.

    I can look at the matter both ways. The difference is that you can’t. And you can’t because you’re feeling not thinking. And you are why majority democracy will end this time as well because of it, and return to a ‘demonstrably competent and responsible people only’ means of selecting representatives.

    My hope is that’s the answer rather than the less appealing alternatives.

    Reply addressees: @talkingwalk @NoahBookbinder

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 22:37:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748474782318792704

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748462119597859015

  • Calling january 6th Insurrection is an opinion. What I saw was a protest over a

    Calling january 6th Insurrection is an opinion. What I saw was a protest over a belief that an election was subject to corruption. And that’s precisely what the participants said they were doing. In their view the court should have stepped in to settle the matter, and by failing to do so they could not let corruption stand.
    It doesn’t matter if they were proven right or wrong over time – if at the time that was their state of mind.
    Compare it to the BLM-ANTIFA insurrection that was an organized attempt at insurrection. Vast destruction ruination of cities, pervasive violence, and an increase in the rate of murders we have not yet recovered from.
    It doesn’t matter what you think. You’re almost certainly an NPC. It matters what the court would decide.
    Otherwise, we’d have people calling every little demonstration an insurrection, and we’d have people staging pretense of insurrection against the opposition to have them removed from the ballot.

    I don’t miss the point. I think you can’t even imagine the field of points. Which is why you’re no one at all in life. And some of us have accumulated achievements in multiple fields in life….

    Reply addressees: @andrewnygard @NoahBookbinder

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 18:40:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748415169955323904

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748391440797884465

  • RT @emilyjashinsky: “You don’t know how bad it is.” This was in 1995. Exceedingl

    RT @emilyjashinsky: “You don’t know how bad it is.”

    This was in 1995.

    Exceedingly difficult to find sympathy for people who dismissed and…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 05:34:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748217253949042883

  • “An open member of the Dissident Right (Keith Woods) is more influential on X/Tw

    –“An open member of the Dissident Right (Keith Woods) is more influential on X/Twitter than both Candace Owens and Matt Walsh.”–

    Sorry to disappoint:
    1) demographic distribution on social media is larger at the bottom.
    2) reach to the social media bottom does not convert into influence in votes, elites, or policy
    3) negative correlation between social media users and political action, political participation, and resulting votes.
    4) Bottom feeders and fishers only serve to reinforce the majority perception on both right and left that the losers are to be further suppressed and punished if necessary.
    5) And as a result the conservatives are dragged down by the bottom feeders and bottom fishers. Between fundamentalists, libertarians, and nazis the boat anchor is more than the moral middle can compensate for in social media, mainstream media, or the vote.

    In other words, social media consists of the top of the talking class and the bottom economic and social classes, absent the middle and the top – who have better things to do, because they are neither trying to enfranchise or find franchise.

    The way we used to say this in old media is “More people read USA Today, but the only people that matter read the Wall Street Journal.”

    Woods and Fuentes and their peers are bottom fishing for bottom feeders. But it doesn’t convert to political consequence in their favor. It does the opposite.

    (Cue the tirade from the loser brigade.) 😉

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @UBERSOY1

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 04:05:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748194904046522368

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748170151436935242

  • “A large percent, and perhaps most, of left, center, and right, simply don’t des

    “A large percent, and perhaps most, of left, center, and right, simply don’t deserve saving from themselves, independent of whether they can be saved from each other, or the pseudo elites both foreign and domestic, who set them against one another to gain power over them, with the false promise of better results than we demonstrated before they divided our people with those false promises.”

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 23:20:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748123238859702272